Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Glenn Wolsey

macrumors 65816
Original poster
That's right, if you couldn't tell from the title I've finally taken the plunge on a DSLR. What did I chose? The Canon EOS 350D.

So far I've taken around 100 test shots, the DSLR gives me immensive control over what I'm shooting. I've already done some comparisons to my Sony P&S and it wasn't even worth my time, the 350D blew the Sony away in image quality.

Current kit: Canon EOS 350D Body, 18-55 Kit Lens.
Coming Soon: 2GB CF Card, 50mm 1.8 Lens, 75-300 Lens.

Keep an eye on my Flickr account for photos!
 
Congrats on the new camera, you'll love it.

If I may - I'd advise against the 75-300, and in its place recommend the 70-200 f/4L. It's not much more money, and it is a much, much, much better lens.
 
If I may - I'd advise against the 75-300, and in its place recommend the 70-200 f/4L. It's not much more money, and it is a much, much, much better lens.

Strongly seconded. Hell, I can't go overboard in saying how much I agree with this comment.

I took maybe a dozen shots with my 75-300 on my 20D, looked at them, and sold the lens on eBay. You'll get better results from cropping the 70-200.
 
That's right, if you couldn't tell from the title I've finally taken the plunge on a DSLR. What did I chose? The Canon EOS 350D.

So far I've taken around 100 test shots, the DSLR gives me immensive control over what I'm shooting. I've already done some comparisons to my Sony P&S and it wasn't even worth my time, the 350D blew the Sony away in image quality.

Current kit: Canon EOS 350D Body, 18-55 Kit Lens.
Coming Soon: 2GB CF Card, 50mm 1.8 Lens, 75-300 Lens.

Keep an eye on my Flickr account for photos!

Congrats Glenn.

Glad you got the 50mm 1.8 straight off; you'll love it.
 
Congrats!

I'm with the others - skip the 75-300. If you need that range on a budget, the Sigma 70-300 APO DG Macro will do a pretty good job for about $200. Otherwise, save up and get the 70-200 f/4L (non-IS), it's amazing.
 
Congrats!

I'm with the others - skip the 75-300. If you need that range on a budget, the Sigma 70-300 APO DG Macro will do a pretty good job for about $200. Otherwise, save up and get the 70-200 f/4L (non-IS), it's amazing.

I'll chime in as well, the 70-200f/4.0 is an amazing lens. More so than image quality for me is its ability to focus extremely fast. One of the reasons I got a DSLR was to get rid of shutter lag... why not buy a lens that doesn't spend forever* trying to focus on the subject?

~Tyler


*Forever is a relative term. I do a lot of action/sports photography, and a slower focus would drive me insane.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.