Technically USB3 is crap, when compared to Thunderbolt. Most Macs have 4 Thunderbolt (2 full duplex) channels on the 1 port, which gives 40Gbps (10Gbps per channel) throughput!
Besides any port you like can be surfaced through a single Thunderbolt port, and WITH none of this "burst mode" for the quoted maximum bandwidth. USB2 can't guarantee 480Mbps all the time and USB relies heavily on the CPU for most of its transfer functionality, that's why it's cheap (because it's pretty dumb). Thunderbolt on the other hand, like Firewire before it, has quite sophisticated hardware controller chips that include error-correction/QoS (another overhead that USB has to deal with). All of this
guarantees that quoted 10Gpbs per-channel (as long as the device can push/pull the data that fast).
Will one USB3 port be able to provide
ALL of these at the same:
- 2560x1440 Video using the native GPU (USB doesn't)
- Audio Output
- 3x POWERED USB2 ports
- 1x Firewire 800 port
- 1x Gigabit Ethernet Port
- 1x FaceTime HD Camera (a USB 2.0 device, independent of the 3 USB2 ports).
I'm sure 1 Thunderbolt port could do a hell of a lot more too, it's just that's all the I/O the Apple Thunderbolt display exposes down ONE connection.
The only thing USB ever had going for it was that it was cheap (and underpowered), just like
most Windows PCs really.