Pages rules, Keynote rules, Microsoft Entourage rules, and the rest I give to the wonderful people at Neooffice. 
RTF.viccles said:Ok heres a question...how do the other ones go with compatibility to PC? Say I did a document in one of the other word processors besides word would I be able to go on a PC at uni and access and use it?
IJ Reilly said:This is a pretty typical criticism of Pages. "I haven't really used it, but I don't like it anyway."
Templates are actually one of Pages' strengths -- not necessarily the ones Apple provides, which I've only rarely used, but the ones you create yourself. Set up a few custom templates for yourself with placeholder text and images for the kinds of documents you create regularly, and you'll wonder how you ever lived without this facility. The way Pages handles text and paragraph styles is also a breeze -- far superior to Word.
Counterfit said:RTF.![]()
buffalo said:The times when I did try it I just couldn't get into it, so I've stuck with Office. When I'm typing documents, it usually is just a report or letter or something that doesn't need a template, so I never gave Pages a fair shot. I tried to create a school project brochure on it, and had some trouble so I gave up. Office also had a "sample brochure" and wasn't any better so I should've stuck with Pages.
Lorelai said:Does Pages have the footnote function? As a history major, I have to write most of my papers in the Chicago style with footnotes or endnotes.
Badandy said:Can you stop trying to spread your evangelical "I hate MS" crap? Because unless you want to shed some light on why Office 2004 would not be a good choice for the poster, you saying it isn't adequate just because of your ingrained hate for MS (no, not a dollar sign, it is an S) isn't helping anyone or helping the images of Mac Users as ideological zealots.
As for me, I find Office 2004 better than Office 2003 for Windows, and currently (after trying other solutions) think it is a great piece of software. I highly recommend it not only for its obvious compatibility with the Windows world, but I think it is a well executed piece of software besides for some extremely minor annoyances such as automatic numbering weirdness...
macdaddy121 said:How compatible is pages with MS office. I have office for mac and and I would rather use pages (because it's apple). I don't feel like ready through all of the posts and searching.....sorry normally I do....I would just like someone to let me know. Thanks for putting up with my temporary bout with laziness![]()
IJ Reilly said:The above explanation pretty much says it all. No other word processor is going to perfectly translate the Word format, but many do a pretty good job. Pages does well, as long as the formatting isn't too complicated.
You forgot to mention that even the different installations of Word often have trouble with translating the formatting intent from a different install. It gets worse when you're dealing with different versions of Word, but I still see significant formatting changes from one copy of Word XP to another at work.IJ Reilly said:No other word processor is going to perfectly translate the Word format, but many do a pretty good job.
Great... thanks!yojitani said:Yes. Either/Or - Either footnotes OR endnotes, but not both in the same doc.
balamw said:You forgot to mention that even the different installations of Word often have trouble with translating the formatting intent from a different install. It gets worse when you're dealing with different versions of Word, but I still see significant formatting changes from one copy of Word XP to another at work.
B
Aika said:The current release of NeoOffice is free, multi-lingual and intel native. The upcoming big release will be free come the end of august too: the early access program is to drum up donations reallyI really don't recommend OpenOffice on OS X... it's not a nice experience.