Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
In the spirit of this thread, there is an option under the Energy Saver preferences to spin down the disc whenever possible. I think I've seen a few pauses which I'd attribute to having to spin the hard disc up after letting it idle and spin down, so I've turned this off. I haven't seen such pauses since.

I wouldn't recommend doing this on a portable as it probably contributes significantly to power saving capabilities. As for desktop power consumption - I've been ripping my CD collection through iTunes all afternoon (about 1800 songs so far), which means both processors have been at about 75% virtually continuously. My 1GB of extra memory arrived, so the case got opened. The PSU seemed hotter than the big heatsink over the processors! I doubt this is really caused by keeping a hard disc spinning more frequently.

And the PSU says "400W Max" on the side, so Powerjacks's hypothesis (was it him?) doesn't seem to bear up.

And I can confirm that mixed 256Mb and 512MB DIMMs work together - in case there was any doubt (there was in my mind prior to inserting them, mainly because none of Apple's literature wanted to explicitly say you could mix sizes).
 
In response to my own query, I decided to do the test, so here are the results...to do the testing I used Let1kwindowsbloom (http://www.vgg.com/rob/WindowsBloom.html) running with Aqua shadowing enabled, and without (using Shadowkiller)

Normal 10.2 default:

53 seconds to open/close 1000 windows

Using ShadowKiller under 10.2: (http://www.unsanity.com/haxies/shadowkiller/)

41 seconds to open/close 1000 windows

It works just fine in 10.2, if you can stand having no shadows...

Tested on iBook 700MHz running 10.2, 16MB VRAM (QE Enabled)
 
Originally posted by Axiom
53 seconds to open/close 1000 windows

41 seconds to open/close 1000
From a purely benchmark POV:

53-41=12

12/1000=.012 per window (on your setup)

Multiply that up over time and it's more productive. That's not including resizing and other operations that get a performance increase.

I'm the opposite of most people, I don't like the rendered shadow look. :)
 
Jaguar speed

One observation and one question -

Jaguar uses significantly more VM swap space than 10.1.5 on a 400M Lombard with 384M RAM. It becomes important to close applications when done.

I did an upgrade install and could not find the option for a clean install of any kind, how do you get to that option?
 
Re: Jaguar speed

Originally posted by mmcneil
One observation and one question -

Jaguar uses significantly more VM swap space than 10.1.5 on a 400M Lombard with 384M RAM. It becomes important to close applications when done.

I did an upgrade install and could not find the option for a clean install of any kind, how do you get to that option?

On the OS 10.2 install CD, when you select your hardrive you have an Option button on the bottom left. click it and you'll have 3 options for the install. Choose the clean install one.

Hope that I could help

Cheers!
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.