Me too. Our communication. Infrastructure is too important to rely on foreign countries.
They won't be able to rebrand Sprint as "SoftBank". There are actually legal restrictions on US companies operating with the word "Bank" in their name, without using an alternate spelling such as "Banq" or "Banc".
How is Bank Of America operating?
Whomever leaked this information early should be brought up on charges for insider trading or misappropriation by the SEC. Any of your who traded on that information should be careful as you could be charged with insider trading as it was leaked only to some people and rather than publicly released through an official wire release.
You do know that Verizon is majority owned by Vodaphone right???
----------
How is Bank Of America operating?
I can imagine Americans thinking that Sprint is now owned by a Japanese bank.
----------
Well we would at least grandfather in to the old ones, and we would have unlimited LTE for a price lower than the other guys!
----------
Too bad that "our communication infrastructure" is now running at the speeds of .002mbps, so if a foreign country can do a better job, have at it. I am not staying with something "American" just because it is American, if they want me to stay American, make a better product (You know, like capitalism is designed to do!!!)
You do know that Verizon is majority owned by Vodaphone right???
----------
How is Bank Of America operating?
If a foreign corporation is going to eat up Sprint.... I'd rather it be the Japanese than the Chinese.
I have little trust in Chinese multinational corporations, as evidenced by the recent news of Huawei and ZTE on the verge of being black-listed by the US and Canadian governments (due to their ties to the Communist Party, People's Liberation Army, and their involvement in espionage against the USA).
Yeah that is not the point. It is a security issue.
They won't be able to rebrand Sprint as "SoftBank". There are actually legal restrictions on US companies operating with the word "Bank" in their name, without using an alternate spelling such as "Banq" or "Banc".
Arguing for the sake of arguing, eh? It's obvious why people might think SoftBank is a bank, and no, I don't think of a bank of software when I see a bank.
/me Thinks you're reading too much into it. it's fairly obvious, and you know it why people might think "SoftBank" is an actual bank.
I think you mean " staying Americanwith AT&T
"
Because they are actually a bank.
Would you care to explain? Could you provide some links to backup your assertion?This is wrong.
In an ideal world that would be true. But these days it seems like capitalism is designed so that huge companies can make huge profits with as little effort as possible. The big telecoms offer similar services at similar prices, as do the cable companies, utilities, gas stations, etc.... There's a happy illusion of choice.
My happy illusion currently is AT&T.![]()
I must be the only one who actually likes SoftBank that has commented on this thread.
As someone who has had J-Phone, Vodafone AND SoftBank, believe me when I say that things have improved over the years. Since the iPhone debuted on SoftBank's network, SoftBank has always done right by me - unlimited data, calling and reliable reception both in the big cities and the countryside.
Compare that to Docomo, which claims unlimited data but throttles to 128k after 7 gigs.
They have always had excellent plans - anyone remember what the big 3's plans looked like before SoftBank's White Plan came out?
Sprint subscribers have only good things to look forward to. SoftBank knows what they're doing.