This ^ is the real problem.
Apples platform Apples rules. If they really wanted to they could revamp and really lockdown things. Mite be a good thing mite be a horrible thing.
This ^ is the real problem.
"... I think there are times when they simply forget an item's in the review queue or they intentionally keep it untouched as a sanction to a developer giving them the wrong attitude," Shoji told Bloomberg.
Well, Apple will face that they can't simply do anything they want here on planet earth.
They will have to obey the rules and laws setup by nations around the world.
There are uncounable small devs that got insulted and abused by Apple, we had the same effect with Harvey Weinstein, but in this case it's digital sales rapping. It's not about getting a piece of cake, but thanks to EPIC the small devs became courageous and started to raise their voices.
It's about time for a general sideloading enforcement law.
Is that really a terrible thing though? Having to host themselves would probably mean more polished apps and less of the rip off apps and malicious apps.
I find it funny that if developers had embraced Steve’s OG vision of web apps almost every argument would be moot. It was developers disinterest that forced Apple to create the App Store. Which was embraced, and is now being vilified.
I think you are forgetting about Installer.app and Cydia. They existed before Apple "created" the app store.I find it funny that if developers had embraced Steve’s OG vision of web apps almost every argument would be moot. It was developers disinterest that forced Apple to create the App Store. Which was embraced, and is now being vilified.
Did developers' disinterest in web apps call for a health and prudery police? Developers were asking for APIs and a way to install apps. Not for "the App Store".
By the same token, it shows that Apple restrictions are pointless and useless. They do inconvenience iDevice owners though.There are plenty of ways to do gambling and porn on the Internet. Big bad Apple isn’t stopping you from indulging in vice.
They will have to obey the rules and laws setup by nations around the world.
" Some developers even rely on a third-party service called iOS Reject Rescue, which helps them navigate through Apple's approval process if their app is rejected. "
This tells me the problems are more real than imagined. The fact that Japanese developers are making the complaint merely compounds this.
I sometimes wonder what it would be like today in an alternate universe where iPhones only had web apps. And how that would have affected iPads.I find it funny that if developers had embraced Steve’s OG vision of web apps almost every argument would be moot. It was developers disinterest that forced Apple to create the App Store. Which was embraced, and is now being vilified.
So devs want the "right" to exist for free in the app store (no cost to consumers), and also not pay Apple on in app purchases? How on earth, then, is Apple supposed to make any money? Maybe Apple should just eliminate free and charge for every app, instead.
It’s still apples infrastructure. And “inconveniencing” Idevices owners is not binary. It’s a gray area.By the same token, it shows that Apple restrictions are pointless and useless. They do inconvenience iDevice owners though.
It all seems to come under what they perceive the intent is. For instance, you can get a role playing app approved if it is all fantasy fun and dungeons and dragons. But you can't get one approved if the existing site is known primarily as a place for sexual role play. Even if at the end of the day these are both just glorified group chats that can also be done on Discord.
Reddit is not a primary provider of porn, at least it seems that way from my own visits.
lol, so does Safari. Should they provide a explanation why in this case as well?Porn is allegedly not allowed on the App Store as per its rules.
However, an app like Reddit displays porn content on many of its subreddits. I would love an explanation by Apple on why is Reddit allowed to include porn and not others.
Modern CDN's charge about 2 cents to deliver a 1GB game, with no minimum (sometimes my bill is 1 cent per month) and even better pricing for high volume customers.Well there are still significantly more apps out there than would be possible if developers had to pay to host them themselves. Bandwidth usage isn't trivial and CDN's aren't free.
This is my believe tooI dont believe that for a second. The AppStore was launched in 2008, just a year after the initial iPhone launch. It was likely planned all along. The APIs for such a new platform were likely still in flux, incomplete, and lacking documentation when the phone was first introduced, so they didn't open it up to 3rd party developers for a year..... but that was too quick for them to wait months to see what was going on, say oh, no one is making web apps, what should we do? Oh I know, lets publish our APIs, build an App Store, a review process, staff it all, and a developer program. Apple doesn't move quickly on decisions, their product pipeline is years deep.
What's gray about it? With Apple restrictions iDevice owners are restricted to using web browser for certain activities. Without these restrictions they would have additional option of using specialized apps. Show me the gray area.It’s still apples infrastructure. And “inconveniencing” Idevices owners is not binary. It’s a gray area.
Apple does not help with any content delivered by the apps. They still charge for it though (subscriptions etc.)Well there are still significantly more apps out there than would be possible if developers had to pay to host them themselves. Bandwidth usage isn't trivial and CDN's aren't free. However, yes there is a downside and that is what content we can sell in a native app. Apple need a 16 and over gated version of the App Store so they can still protect the kids while also opening up to adult focused apps(that doesn't need to mean porn).
The grey area is that customers who buy these products have to do their homework. Example: Are people who buy a car like the civic inconvenienced because they can’t tow a full trailer ?What's gray about it? With Apple restrictions iDevice owners are restricted to using web browser for certain activities. Without these restrictions they would have additional option of using specialized apps. Show me the gray area.