Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Very little would surprise me at this point. I wouldn't be amazed if e.g. "sustainable" Tim is also caught exporting Infinite Loop's garbage to Cambodia, he'd still peddle the same glib calendar quotes and holiday wishing on Twitter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Naraxus
This is normal big business. If a vendor wants a big business, the OEM (here Apple) can make many demands. If the business is big enough, the OEM can require a vendor to sub license a competitor to produce a part of the volume. If the vendor doesn’t like this, they refuse a contract. The vendor’s leverage is better if it has a unique product or strongly protected technology, or an extremely competitive cost and price structure.

It occurs to me that Apple requires carriers to subsidize advertising and to cover repairs because 1) carriers use the iPhone to attract new and retain current customers, and 2) if the carriers weren’t generally responsible for repair costs that they would, at Apple’s cost, replace phones left and right for any reason or no reason at all except to keep a customer happy. These two policies recognize the carrier’s skin in the game.
[doublepost=1565071769][/doublepost]
Very little would surprise me at this point. I wouldn't be amazed if e.g. "sustainable" Tim is also caught exporting Infinite Loop's garbage to Cambodia, he'd still peddle the same glib calendar quotes and holiday wishing on Twitter.

Except Apple transparently documents these initiatives in annual public reports.
[doublepost=1565071869][/doublepost]
Apple accused Qualcomm of monopolistic practices. I guess what's good for the goose is not good for the gander.

Funny, most of the industry supported Apple’s position in court.
 
Apple engaging in shady business practices as usual.

Who among us is shocked by this? :D

Nope not one bit.. as the report says their are now multiple government investigations around the globe being performed on Apples practices.. where’s there’s smoke...
If they come to the conclusions Apples guilty then you might know why all these people including Ive left the company.
[doublepost=1565072292][/doublepost]
I watched a news program a few years back that followed a very small manufacturing factory here in Japan. As has often been the case in Japan, manufacturing craftsmanship is some of the best in the world, and they won business with Apple by creating a small metal part in an iPhone that no other manufacturer in the world could (think it was the iPhone 4 days maybe).
They continued manufacturing for a coupe of more models, but during this period was asked by Apple for details on its manufacturing process. They trusted Apple (silly maybe, but this place is run by a guy in his 60’s, being a craftsman all his life. Not a businessman), but turns out by the following year a large Chinese manufacturer had somehow figured out how to make the part that had been impossible for them, Apple quickly cut ties with the Japanese manufacturer and went with what was now a cheaper part made in China. I was disgusted at the time.
The Macrumors article might be talking about this particular case.

Yes, let’s remember there’s exactly what Qualcomm accused them off... and then all of a sudden Apple dropped its court case against them when Qualcomm stared they had proof Apple gave its tech and designs to Intel...
Seems it’s Apples MO, as Hobs said ‘great artists steal’.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Naraxus
"When one of the companies called Apple's contract an infringement of intellectual property rights and demanded a revision, Apple allegedly threatened to end the business relationship"

Not making excuses for Apple nor saying their approach is morally on up & up;

But if a company wants something & I don't want to fulfill all details of the deal - either compromise your morals or decline.

All the boohoo about China so called "stealing" our tech is bs
The companies wanted to do business in China so bad (pure greed) they caved and gave China what China wanted.

Google to their credit stood on their morals they bailed on China

Big customer purchasing management often makes the relationship claim. I negotiated countless big contracts, one customer always tried to deny a certain reasonably expectable financial clause (that massively benefited them of course), Each time they threatened to with the nomination, each time I said that would be ok, and a day later, they agreed to our requirement.

Don’t think that bad old Apple is culturally abusing Japanese industry.

Our Japanese customers would require “productivity”, ie annual price reductions passed back over the life of the contract (a concept if not invented in japan, massively implemented there during their devastating deflationary economic situation in the 1990’s), but after the contract was signed, they would often come back with additional reduction demands (sometimes weeks after signing), when we protested, the threatened to pull the business.

Nope not one bit.. as the report says their are now multiple government investigations around the globe being performed on Apples practices.. where’s there’s smoke...
If they come to the conclusions Apples guilty then you might know why all these people including Ive left the company.
[doublepost=1565072292][/doublepost]

Yes, let’s remember there’s exactly what Qualcomm accused them off... and then all of a sudden Apple dropped its court case against them when Qualcomm stared they had proof Apple gave its tech and designs to Intel...
Seems it’s Apples MO, as Hobs said ‘great artists steal’.
Apple dropped the case because Intel kept slipping dates and was unable to provide a alternative to Qualcomm components and Apple was not far enough along with a home grown alternative. If Apple had not struck a deal, future new product releases would have been delayed. Now that Apple has purchased Intel’s modem operations, you can bet Apple is working all out to develop a component to reduce dependence on Qualcomm.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: Kaibelf
Apple is once again taking advantage of their brand to bully smaller companies. I appreciate their attitude towards protecting consumer privacy and such, but I don’t remember the last time they talked about their business ethics, aside from their environmental friendly practices (which is shadowed by suspected planned obsolescence).
 
  • Like
Reactions: apolloa
Apple is once again taking advantage of their brand to bully smaller companies. I appreciate their attitude towards protecting consumer privacy and such, but I don’t remember the last time they talked about their business ethics, aside from their environmental friendly practices (which is shadowed by suspected planned obsolescence).

Don’t you think the planned obsolescence trope should be retired?

There are 10 year old macs still getting macOS updates.

The iPhone 5S (6y old model, last sold 3.5 years ago) is supported with current iOS updates.

The Airport Routers all the way back to 2007 got updates a month ago.

The iPhone 4S (8y old design, last sold 6y ago) and iPad 3 got ios updates a couple weeks ago to prevent a future gps issue.

People on android often can’t even get updates when the devices are new.

Blackberry and MS/Nokia phones from 2011 aren’t even supported as far as I know.

You might want to rethink your prejudices they don’t stand up in the face of fact.
 
Don’t you think the planned obsolescence trope should be retired?

There are 10 year old macs still getting macOS updates.

The iPhone 5S (6y old model, last sold 3.5 years ago) is supported with current iOS updates.

The Airport Routers all the way back to 2007 got updates a month ago.

The iPhone 4S (8y old design, last sold 6y ago) and iPad 3 got ios updates a couple weeks ago to prevent a future gps issue.

People on android often can’t even get updates when the devices are new.

Blackberry and MS/Nokia phones from 2011 aren’t even supported as far as I know.

You might want to rethink your prejudices they don’t stand up in the face of fact.

I think these are very solid arguments. They have done a very good job in terms of OS backward compatibility that most android users can only dream of (although there are custom ROMs). But for many, they upgrade their devices because of broken hardware, not outdated but still usable software. Apple earn most money when people buy new devices from them.

The trend is that they are making their devices more and more difficult to repair, at least for "unauthorized repair centers". There is the T2 ship in MacBooks, then there is the Secure Enclave. That can be a loss for consumers once Apple Care expires: either expensive official out-of-warranty repair, or buy a new device (since none other can replace the parts), and Apple Geniuses often recommend the later.

In Apple's defense, those chips do provide unique features, such as memory encryption and power saving. I think Apple do not necessarily have planned obsolescence in mind, but more devices will be disposed due to their hardware and software design choices.
 
Apple accused Qualcomm of monopolistic practices. I guess what's good for the goose is not good for the gander.

Surprise surprise

Apple engaging in shady business practices as usual.

Now you can blame Tim.

Not surprised at all. Apple is a company capable of doing this and much more. They are very courageous after all...

it doesn't take an investigation to know if that took place. It's widely known that's how  carries out business

If you ever wonder how Apple (et al.) got so obscenely wealthy, here’s one answer. By being a bully essentially.

Corporations don't care about doing good. They only care about how their sheep perceive them and how much they can milk them for. Apple is no different.

The unfortunate thing about capitalism is that profit takes priority, resulting in very distasteful decisions.

Apple needs to be stopped.

The powerful taking advantage over the less powerful.

Everyone take a breath and pile off. All we know is the complaint. I’d hate to have this community on a jury.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kaibelf
I think these are very solid arguments. They have done a very good job in terms of OS backward compatibility that most android users can only dream of (although there are custom ROMs). But for many, they upgrade their devices because of broken hardware, not outdated but still usable software. Apple earn most money when people buy new devices from them.

The trend is that they are making their devices more and more difficult to repair, at least for "unauthorized repair centers". There is the T2 ship in MacBooks, then there is the Secure Enclave. That can be a loss for consumers once Apple Care expires: either expensive official out-of-warranty repair, or buy a new device (since none other can replace the parts), and Apple Geniuses often recommend the later.

In Apple's defense, those chips do provide unique features, such as memory encryption and power saving. I think Apple do not necessarily have planned obsolescence in mind, but more devices will be disposed due to their hardware and software design choices.

You do realize your argument is based on edge cases don’t you? Enclave and T2, who had ever heard of these being a problem? The big repair issues are what they have always been, display, glass back cover, battery aging. Even water damage has been reduced due to water resistance.

For the vast majority, if you don’t smash or dunk it, you will have a long lived phone that you ditch because it’s processor is too slow to handle the newer s/w features (do it doesn’t get them) and it’s battery is not worth replacing because of that. (Also your friends have newer units and you don’t want to feel left behind - this is important to many.)

That is the opposite of planned obsolescence.
 
it doesn't take an investigation to know if that took place. It's widely known that's how  carries out business

The same as any other company: here are our terms, and if you cannot accept them there is no deal. It’s business, not a day care.
[doublepost=1565091636][/doublepost]
Very little would surprise me at this point. I wouldn't be amazed if e.g. "sustainable" Tim is also caught exporting Infinite Loop's garbage to Cambodia, he'd still peddle the same glib calendar quotes and holiday wishing on Twitter.

Because Steve Jobs was so well known for his kind and flexible negotiating style?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kabeyun
Apple dropped the case because Intel kept slipping dates and was unable to provide a alternative to Qualcomm components and Apple was not far enough along with a home grown alternative. If Apple had not struck a deal, future new product releases would have been delayed. Now that Apple has purchased Intel’s modem operations, you can bet Apple is working all out to develop a component to reduce dependence on Qualcomm.

Nope, the timeline shows Apple dropped its case very soon after Qualcomm threatened them with hard evidence of the claim of Apple passing over their secrets to Intel..
Qualcomm is still the best and probably will always be the best.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Naraxus and PC_tech
Documentary mentioned above is probably about Apple stealing the skill of polishing the back of iPod case back in the days under Steve Jobs.

Apple had someone video factory workers for several days in great depths and ditched the factory once they were able to copy the process (close enough) in China.

Apple didn’t ask for permission or anything. Factory owner Mr.Kobayashi who was 65 at the time knew what was up, but he couldn’t put up resistance under pressure by a multi-national giant.

Found a random clip on the dude & the work he was so proud to share with Apple:
 
There is nothing unethical proven by this report.

Business isn’t enough or always fair. It’s business. You use advantages.

Disney does it in the way they treat theaters. It ain’t easy.
So Apple is paying its partners ($$$) and they want what they want for their $$$. Am I missing something?
 
Why would you think this has anything to do with a trade war? It has nothing to do with a trade war.
Exactly. Tim Apple, who just announced he’s moving work from Texas to China, won’t be getting any help from President Trump.

Greed on both sides: Apple obviously using its size to push around smaller companies; but true also of the executives at that (and other) firms.
 
  • Like
Reactions: otternonsense
Funny, most of the industry supported Apple’s position in court.

As Funny as most of the industry in Japan appearing to support the claim that Apple is acting as a monopolist?

"The FTC in Japan surveyed Japanese companies and found that Apple had signed contracts forcing its partners to provide free technology and know-how for parts manufacturing."
 
  • Like
Reactions: apolloa and PC_tech
Documentary mentioned above is probably about Apple stealing the skill of polishing the back of iPod case back in the days under Steve Jobs.

Apple had someone video factory workers for several days in great depths and ditched the factory once they were able to copy the process (close enough) in China.

Apple didn’t ask for permission or anything. Factory owner Mr.Kobayashi who was 65 at the time knew what was up, but he couldn’t put up resistance under pressure by a multi-national giant.

Found a random clip on the dude & the work he was so proud to share with Apple:
Yes, thanks, I think that might have been the one I was thinking of.
 
Exactly. Tim Apple, who just announced he’s moving work from Texas to China, won’t be getting any help from President Trump.

Greed on both sides: Apple obviously using its size to push around smaller companies; but true also of the executives at that (and other) firms.
Seems there might be a good reason for Tim Cook to move to China, like to get the product made. Tim "Apple":rolleyes:
Apple "struggled to find enough screws" when it began making the 2013 Mac Pro, a New York Times article explained. "Tests of new versions of the computer were hamstrung because a 20-employee machine shop that Apple's manufacturing contractor was relying on could produce at most 1,000 screws a day." The screw shortage and other problems caused a months-long delay in Mac Pro sales.
 
As an Apple fanboy (I usually don’t realize it until I objectively see all the apple/beats/etc gadgets I own and have owned during the years)... this is really upsetting if any of these is remotely true...

Way back in 2014, another company had already filed a lawsuit for the same reason.
https://www.pcworld.com/article/286...t-against-apple-over-laptop-charger-pins.html
Nikkie and other Japanese newspapers have repeatedly reported similar cases numerous times. It's just like everyone in my industry knows their business tactic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PC_tech
Except Apple transparently documents these initiatives in annual public reports.
[doublepost=1565071869][/doublepost]

In regards to financial reporting, the numbers are audited but auditors never check anywhere other than numbers, except for a few others like business contingency matters.
In other words, no external party never and ever checks their "reported" recycle policies etc. I know coz myself is an auditor.
They have no obligation to disclose non financials other than what SEC mandates. Even then, they are not required to disclose every single detail.

Its up to you to believe these information is transparent, but generally speaking, no one doesn't.
 
There is just far too much evidence from court cases from around the world over the past decades that has proven large corporations do not play by the rules and sometimes operate outside the law. Why should Apple be any different.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.