Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Originally posted by BoydAnnison
Try telling your girlfriend that you have two pairs of the latest iSpy digital goggles and would she like to come over to watch a movie? Compared with the experience of going out for a good pizza, the cinema, and the potential for a mutual smile after brushing hands in the popcorn bucket...

Or you and your girlfriend could brush more than hands while traversing the Amazon, or the universe... call me a sleazeball but....
 
He is right about video.

But I believe the next generation of the iPod family should really update its screen and graphics. Same basic OS and organizational structure... but I can easily see a selected iPhoto library syncing to the iPod, so that it is like a modern day equivalent of all the wallet photos.

Is display technology good enough/cheap enough yet? I dunno, but it is such an obvious evolution.
 
I think the content issue (or lack of) is what would hurt a VideoiPOD. As was mentioned, there just isn't a simple way to download this weeks CSI episode (at least not yet). iPrimetime ?

What I'd like to see from Apple is an affordable, mast produced product that I can really use - the iSPOT. There are WiFi access points everywhere now (Buffalo Wild Wings Restaurants, Scholtzsky's Deli, Delta Crown Room, etc.) and I like keeping up with my email and browsing while at lunch. How about a iBookmini ? Take the iBook, remove the CD Drive and shrink the thing down with a 6 or 7 inch LCD screen (or smaller, if possible). Comes standard with Airport. Sell it for $699 and you'd get my money. If Sony can produce a CLIE UX-50 for $649, Apple can shrink the iBook.
 
Can't really see watching a movie on an iPod screen or buying movies from iTunes. Net's just to slow. Maybe with internet 2 this will be possible.
 
Originally posted by pyrotoaster
Sure, there's content out there (I've got a few episodes of "The Critic" on my hard drive), but it's hard to get at (Even with DSL, it takes hours to download an episode of "The Critic") and often of low quality (one of my episodes of "The Critic" has a whole third of it where the audio is off by a couple seconds).
FTTH! :D :D :D

DL a CD in a little over a minute.

DL a DVD (video part) in a little over 5 minutes.

Sushi
 
The last line is the one that cough my attention: "Who knows what we've got in our labs."

Brings to mind several thoughts:

Those labs must be a fantastic place to work in. I can think of few places that would match that job.

While we don't know (but can always guess - however wrong) Apple has blown our minds more than a few times from the original Mac to the iPod. They always seem to come up with better ideas that I could ever dream of and better than most of the posts I have read.

Steve J has said that this is going to be a very exciting year. That should make even M Dell want to see what is going on in those labs.
 
Originally posted by snahabed
He is right about video.

But I believe the next generation of the iPod family should really update its screen and graphics. Same basic OS and organizational structure... but I can easily see a selected iPhoto library syncing to the iPod, so that it is like a modern day equivalent of all the wallet photos.

Is display technology good enough/cheap enough yet? I dunno, but it is such an obvious evolution.

I want:

To view my iPhoto lib on my iPod.

To view my digital photography on my iPod.

To view my digital video I just shot from my Canon XL.

To view my iPod menu screen in colour and get rid of the black and white look.

To use more app. via my iPod like controla Keynote with it.

If I can view a movie on it..then thats just and extra feature.

-----------------------------------------------
I own a B&W 3 inch tv I use to love when I was working a night shift. You would be amazed how many people will watch some ball game on a 3 inch tv. I had like 5 people watching with me.
 
Re: Jobs on Portable Video Players

Originally posted by Macrumors
Jobs take on it was to give three reasons why he doubted video players would approach the success of audio players.

Jobs only said that they wouldn't come close to the success of audio players. And he's right. But, he never said a video player wouldn't be successful.
 
apple's definitely working on it

Maybe they're only tinkering with the idea, but I think that at the very least we'll see an iPod type gadget with a S-Video out and MPEG decoding chip.

It will allow you to carry around your iMovies and iPhoto albums and display them anywhere you have a TV or multimedia projector to tap in to.

In addition, many college students are downloading video, and not just movies, but also TV episodes, funny advertisements, etc. These are videos that are compressed to under 50 MB and thus are only the size of maybe, 10 songs.

Perhaps, "Apple introduces the vPod, holds 500 TV episodes!" Of course, movies compress pretty readily to around 650 MB, so even the 15GB vPod holds around 20 full-length movies.

An optional accessory will be a clip-on, 5" LCD screen for watching on the bus, on the plane, etc. Or maybe the vPod has a screen built-in, and folds out like cell phones do. Apple is obviously not planning to make phones, but maybe Apple and Sony-Ericcson collaborate to produce a phone/vPod.

With the proper AppleScripting, your TV-connected Mac could record the morning news for you, strip out the commercials, and compress it and put it on your vPod before you walk out the door.

Sure, some of these ideas are out there, but some of them make sense and could definitely be realized within the next few years.
 
Originally posted by FirstMacPB100
How about a iBookmini ? Take the iBook, remove the CD Drive and shrink the thing down with a 6 or 7 inch LCD screen (or smaller, if possible). Comes standard with Airport. Sell it for $699 and you'd get my money. If Sony can produce a CLIE UX-50 for $649, Apple can shrink the iBook.

YES!

I've mentioned that several times on these forums. Using the same logic as in the miniaturization of the iPod, they should scale down the iBook. I still can't believe they haven't yet. Think of the cash Sony and Fujitsu are making. Apple believes that a lot of iPod mini buyers will be people who already own an iPod. It would probably be the same for a mini iBook.

Squire
 
Re: Jobs on Portable Video Players

Originally posted by Macrumors

Of course, Jobs ends with "Now, I’m not saying we’re not working on something like that, Who knows what we’ve got in our labs?” [/B]

d*mm you cool jobs lol:)
 
steve's point is exactly how i feel. there is no equivalent for headphones. the experience simply isn't that great watching a movie on a tiny screen. but the main thing is the statement that people don't watch their favorite movies the same way they listen to their favorite music. we listen to the same music over and over every day. a few people might do that with a few movies, but it's a totally different experience. we don't just sit down and watch movies most of the time. it's more of a planned activity. but who plans when they're going to listen to music?
 
Originally posted by kidA
steve's point is exactly how i feel. there is no equivalent for headphones. the experience simply isn't that great watching a movie on a tiny screen. but the main thing is the statement that people don't watch their favorite movies the same way they listen to their favorite music. we listen to the same music over and over every day. a few people might do that with a few movies, but it's a totally different experience. we don't just sit down and watch movies most of the time. it's more of a planned activity. but who plans when they're going to listen to music?

Well ... i don't plan when i'm going to watch a movie -- i get HBO type channels with movies on constantly so i just sit down and watch what's on or use the Video on Demand feature, or order Pay per View..

if you consider this planning then listening to music is a planned event ... i mean personally i can't do certain task wile listening to my iPod ie, give a presentation, study (effectively and efficiently), listen to lectures or other people -- so i really only listen to music when i'm sitting on the shuttle bus, or walking to class thats quite a distance away ...
 
people once said hard drived based mp3 players were a waste of time. now look where we are. apple would be crazy not to look into this further.
 
Re: Jobs on Portable Video Players

Originally posted by Macrumors
David Pogue writes (New York Times) on an interview with Steve Jobs at the MacWorld Expo.

The topic of portable Video Players came up and Jobs take on it was to give three reasons why he doubted video players would approach the success of audio players.

The reasons cited include 1) "there's no equivalent of headphones" in that watching video on a small screen is no match for a theatre or even television 2) Hollywood already does a good job selling/distributing their content (dvd, theatres etc...) 3) People don't watch their favorite movies the same way as they listen to their favorite music.

Of course, Jobs ends with "Now, I’m not saying we’re not working on something like that, Who knows what we’ve got in our labs?”

Steve is sure being tricky here. :)

Just because a video "eyePod" wouldn't be as successful as audio players doesn't mean there won't be a small market for it, either now or soon.

And it definitely sounds like Apple is at least toying with the idea right now. :)
 
Originally posted by Steven1621
people once said hard drived based mp3 players were a waste of time. now look where we are. apple would be crazy not to look into this further.

Um, mp3 players are completely different from video players in terms of market-preparedness. That's the whole point of this article, you know? Apple would be crazy to spend much money looking into this right now.
 
What I find ironic....

Is that the keynote speech video is small enough in resolution to view on an iPod, but I can't download it and burn it onto a DVD so I can take it over to my friends house to watch it on his TV.
 
Does not a single person here have a Tivo???

Of course you're not going to watch movies on your vPod. Movies are a tiny, tiny fraction of the video out there.

The vPod will be perfect for 60 Minutes, TLC, Discovery Channel, MTV, CSPAN, Headline news, etc. etc. etc.

NOT MOVIES!!!

You'll just set up your DVR (not TIvo since Tivo has an asinine policy of restricting program extraction) to record a few gigs of stuff, move it to your vPod and watch it whenever you get a chance. Perfect for things like 60 minutes where you might only be interested in in half of it anyway. Same with MTV.

I actually think it's a more important device than iPod. While you can sometimes get passionate about music, it's usually background. Video however gets your focus.
 
Conclusion of the article

This is very true, i think.

"But from his comments, he made it clear that he and Mr. Gates were miles apart on their assessment of a technology’s future. It wouldn’t be the first time."
 
color

If Apple can get better batteries in the iPods, then they will go color lcd surely in the near future.
There are very nice small screens available with a good res. (p900 for example)
Although you cannot watch the iPod screen while walking, working, sporting or driving, it would be nice if you could watch cd-cover art or even music video's, or play colorfull games.
But watching a movie on such a screen? No, Having a movie on the iPod and watching it on a bigger screen? Yes!
 
Video Size

If a new ipod capable of playing standard DVD "Video_TS" folders of movies, we still have the problem with space.

Currently, I use "DVDBackup" to make identical copies of DVDs (my own, of course) and then I use "DVD2oneX" to compress the file size down under 4.7GB for burning ("Toast 6") ... but we're still talking around 4.5GB of space. On the current iPod top-o-the-line of 40GB, you might could get 8 movies on the unit, without any other room for music.

8 movies is fine, but the time it takes to actually rip the DVDs, compress them and then transfer them to the unit would too combersome for the casual user.
 
Off The Wall

I think it would be cool idea for apple to make a head mounted display type of gadget. I don't mean these silly goggle like things weve seen in the past. I mean like 1 small LCD screen placed about 2 inches away from 1 eye. It should be adjustable to fit on either the left or right side. An iSight built in so you can see who you are talking to on a ichat messenger type phone with Mpeg4/AAC streaming. Plus with aac you have the ability to listen to dolby digital sound which could be used to watch movies with special type of surround sound headphones. It can all be plugged into an ipod so you can store loads of songs and movies.
 
Originally posted by Macrumors
1) "there's no equivalent of headphones" in that watching video on a small screen is no match for a theatre or even television
2) Hollywood already does a good job selling/distributing their content (dvd, theatres etc...)
3) People don't watch their favorite movies the same way as they listen to their favorite music.
It's very open... as usual, it lets us make up our own minds on what he's actually denying...

Here's one possibility of a translation:
1) For now it's better to play movies on real TVs
2) DVDs are the best way to get films now and we'll run with that
3) There's no market for watching a movie while jogging.
Originally posted by just a thought
Now, if Apple was actually working on something akin to the "iBox" rumors from a few weeks ago--a NON PORTABLE DVR with a DVD burner that would wirelessly Rendevous network with your iTunes library and now (thanks to iPhoto 4) your photo album, I think that that's something that could possibly have the same sort of mass appeal of the iPod. It would be something for the home, not something you'd take with you everywhere, but that's really how the vast majority of people enjoy their movies: in the home.
What Steve said is totally compatible with the iBox rumour (a device to replace your DVD and VCR). Record your TV programs to DVD, make copies of your home movies, listen to music (& copy CDs), view your iPhotos, pause live TV. But the iBox isn't portable at all.
Originally posted by savar
With the proper AppleScripting, your TV-connected Mac could record the morning news for you, strip out the commercials, and compress it and put it on your vPod before you walk out the door.
Once an iBox device gets popular, it might be an easy extension to download TV shows to a vPod.

Hell, even something much simpler like reading an online version of the newspaper, or downloading the MacRumors site before catching a train - reading stuff, composing a reply etc.
 
i think i know wtf Apple should release.. take note

OK.. here's an interesting idea I had a few weeks back. With the Nokia N-Gage falling flat on its face and the Sony PSP due to incorporate at least some of the features we are looking for, we cannot rule out the possibility of Apple releasing something very similar. Everyone loves games, and this would be another thing to take with you anywhere and anytime (ala iPod).

When the iPod was originally released, Apple were basically saying "hey look. We don't sell music, but you can store up to x,000 illegally downloaded songs on this funky looking device!" . Somewhat to ease their conscience, Apple later release the iTMS. Now they are saying "hey look! we don't support copyright infringement! Our iPods can now hold $9,999 worth of legal music" (hmmmm.. come on.. how many of you don't have ANY 'illegal' MP3s..)

So why don't Apple do the same again? Why not take advantage of the fact that you can download and play ANY oldskool game and play them on a M.A.M.E supported iPlay (cheesy i know)? I have at least 100 amazing NEO-GEO games just sitting here! Why can't Apple take advantage and release some G3 based iPlay device? The latest Gameboy Advance games are completely pants when compared to the original Street Fighter arcades, or having every SNES, Megadrive, Lynx, Gameboy Advance, Neo-Geo, Arcade, NES game sitting in your pocket.

Of course there will be a huge hoo-ha over the copyright infringement, which would probably lead to an iPlay Game Store where you can download retro SNES (e.g.) game roms for a couple of dollars a pop.

My point is, Apple would instantly have one of the greatest portable games libraries available in the world. Couple all this with the ability to watch video files (ok, maybe not films etc.. but if you're an Apple addict i'm sure there are countless things sitting on your computer waiting to be watched.) and syncing contacts and all that stuff..

PLEASE APPLE MAKE MY DREAM COME TRUE!
 
LOL

DJDarlek, that's a brilliant idea. They could even make it an arcade type thing were you can punch in credit card details and download coin op games legally. Gone will be the half arsed ports of arcade classics. The though of an arcade version of metal slug on the go.....niiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiice
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.