Did anyone catch this article on Wired?
A quote:
So far the discussion thread for the article seems overwhelmingly negative towards the author. My main problem with the article aside from the fact that I find judging a person based on their public contributions to charity extremely distastasteful, is that he bases his conclusions on "non evidence" rather than solid evidence.
"You are not on that list as a publicity seeking donor, so you must not be doing any good for your fellow man."
What kind of crap is that?
A quote:
It's Gates who's making a dent in the universe, and Jobs who's taking on the role of single-minded capitalist, seemingly oblivious to the broader needs of society.
So far the discussion thread for the article seems overwhelmingly negative towards the author. My main problem with the article aside from the fact that I find judging a person based on their public contributions to charity extremely distastasteful, is that he bases his conclusions on "non evidence" rather than solid evidence.
"You are not on that list as a publicity seeking donor, so you must not be doing any good for your fellow man."
What kind of crap is that?