Exactly. I don't know the man personally, and I can't stand Wal-Mart, but he was just a board member. I would hardly classify him as evil. Though the company as a whole is a soulless machine, he was not. It is possible that he is one of the board members that cared more about using their resources to help more than just publicity and to cover up the mistakes. But he may not be, we don't know and probably never will.OnceUGoMac said:Second, Sam and his son have nothing to do with the current state of Wal-Mart. That's like blaming Walt Disney for Eisner's actions.
I understand the criticism, to the dead we owe nothing but truth... but I'd ask that we please try to remain civil at least.