They will have guess properly to try this again with the next Mac OS X name.BornAgainMac said:Quick! Change your name to Lion Direct so that you can do this again!
Do you really think that M knowingly with the intent to cause burn cases increased the temperature of the coffee?? If so, why on earths name would they do that? M is a big company, I dont doubt that they through test have figured out the optimal preparing temp. for coffee. (sidenote, If you knew anything about preparing coffee you would know that in order to take full advantage of the coffee, you need very high temp.)NEENAHBOY said:So M probably prepped it at 190 degrees or maybe a little over. They could 've just prepped it at 160 and let it cool down to 145, but noooo. They knew the correct prep temperature, they knew of other burn cases, but they still served their coffee scalding hot.
...what kind of argument is that? 😕 It would serve the discussion better if you stated why people should be treated like they just had arrived from another dimension where the laws of nature doesn't hold.NEENAHBOY said:Sorry, but you have no clue what you're talking about.
MacRy said:Is there really an argument about coffee temperature going on in here or has my common sense gland started malfunctioning again?
If you don't know that coffee is hot and you put it between your legs and drive off (if that is what happened....I know nothing about this case) then you are a moron and deserve to get scolded. Perhaps she'll sue a scissor company because she was running with a pair in her mouth and tripped next.
It's lawsuits such as these that mean we have to endure signs everywhere for the morons of the world proclaiming things like 'Slippery When Wet' or 'Mind Your Head' or 'Coffee Is Hot'. I say we stop putting warning signs on things and let natural selection take care of the less intellectually gifted among us.
Warning:
Post could contain material that over sensitive, delicate little flowers may find offensive.
Dr.Gargoyle said:sorry, a bit off topic I know. I was arguing that the TigerDirect lawsuit was just another frivolous lawsuit. But ok, I shut up and go and get a cup of coffee... 😛
btw, I couldn't agree more with what you wrote 😀
Thanks, but I am not, unlike the lady with the scolded thighs, going for the Darwin award. 😀MacRy said:Hey dude I wasn't having a go at you I promise. In fact I totally agreed with what you were saying.
Be careful with that coffee though....... 😉
Dr.Gargoyle said:My point was just that everybody knows that coffee is hot. In fact it should be hot. .
Dr.Gargoyle said:Do you really think that M knowingly with the intent to cause burn cases increased the temperature of the coffee?
a) Boiling water will scold you to the extent that you will get third degree burn wounds.gwangung said:Not third degree burn hot.
You're basically saying that coffee should normally be hot enough to scorch the esophagus badly enough to require hospitalization.
Sorry, but I don't think so.
Dr.Gargoyle said:a) Boiling water will scold you to the extent that you will get third degree burn wounds.
b) Boiling water is exactly what is needed in the preparation of coffee. (Ok, you can use lukewarm tap water, but the coffee will taste accordingly.)
c) Everybody should know this.
d) Hence be careful if you plan to place the cup in between your thighs.
This is a bit off topic, so let us please end this sidetrack here, ok? If you want to continue, let's start a new thread in the appropriate section.
NEENAHBOY said:So M probably prepped it at 190 degrees or maybe a little over. They could 've just prepped it at 160 and let it cool down to 145, but noooo. They knew the correct prep temperature, they knew of other burn cases, but they still served their coffee scalding hot. Sorry, but you have no clue what you're talking about.
As I said before, there is a lag between the time of preparation and the time of consumption at a restaurant. The probability that the coffee wont be served directly after being prepared can be assumed to be rather high, dont you agree?snkTab said:Um... when do you get a cup of coffee and the store that is still boiling.
Apple also entered into evidence a survey that revealed only 6% of consumers associated the name "Tiger" with TigerDirect. Meanwhile, the survey of 517 people showed that only 4 people associated the name "Tiger" with a company -- a result the Court found most interesting.
please, please... Don't start it up again... 😛 😀MacNut said:For some reason I feel like getting a coffee and using Tiger. 😛 🙄