Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
68,178
38,958


Developer Christian Selig of "Apollo for Reddit" fame has created what Google wouldn't – a dedicated YouTube app for Apple Vision Pro.

juno-youtube.jpeg

Called Juno for YouTube, the app lets Vision Pro owners browse the YouTube platform in a cleanly refined visionOS interface without having to resort to the lackluster alternative, which is visiting the YouTube website in Safari.

The video player includes native controls for interacting with the video, including resizing to create a home theater experience in your living room, repositioning, dimming your room around the video, and more.

In addition, there's support for aspect ratio detection, and buttons to increase or decrease playback speed, toggle captions, and share videos. As you'd expect from a third-party app, no YouTube account is required to use Juno, and it won't auto-skip ads, but YouTube Premium subscribers will enjoy the benefits that accompany the tier through the app.

Selig cautions that early adopters of the app may encounter a few bugs, since he has only been able to develop and interact with it in the Vision Pro simulator. But that's unlikely to concern users who are familiar with the developer's reputation and engagement with people who use his apps. Plus, he's getting a Vision Pro headset today.


YouTube said earlier this month that it is not developing a YouTube Vision Pro app, nor will it allow the YouTube iPad app to run on the device. Netflix and Spotify have said the same thing. Netflix and Spotify will instead be accessible through Safari, similar to YouTube.

Juno for YouTube is priced at $4.99 and the app is already available on the App Store for nascent Vision Pro owners to check out.

Article Link: Juno App Brings YouTube to Apple Vision Pro Because Google Won't
 
Last edited:
I really hope this doesn't turn into a bunch of hacky 3rd party apps trying to replace an app that the actual developers won't make.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gusmula
I find this “who offers an AVP app and who does not” topic and the hysteria around it really childish. The fact is that the current version of AVP is insignificant to most users and developers. For many, it currectly makes no economic sense to release an app for the AVP.
 
I’m always amazed by people’s assumption that the way things are will be that way forever. Just because YouTube doesn’t have an App now doesn’t mean they never will. Same for Netflix and Spotify.

It’s kinda of like declaring the iPhone will fail back in 2007 because it didn’t have spotify as an app. It’s short sighted and doesn’t see the big picture.

Fast forward 5 years when we have a 3rd gen Vision Pro priced around the same as an an iPhone and a much bigger market do you really think there won’t be YouTube, Netflix then?

Do you genuinely believe that?
 
I’m always amazed by people’s assumption that the way things are will be that way forever. Just because YouTube doesn’t have an App now doesn’t mean they never will. Same for Netflix and Spotify.

It’s kinda of like declaring the iPhone will fail back in 2007 because it didn’t have spotify as an app. It’s short sighted and doesn’t see the big picture.

Fast forward 5 years when we have a 3rd gen Vision Pro priced around the same as an an iPhone and a much bigger market do you really think there won’t be YouTube, Netflix then?

Do you genuinely believe that?
I believe it will have these apps! But not that it will be priced the same as an iPhone any time soon, if ever…
 
How long before this goes the way of Beeper?
Or maybe you meant Protube. 😛


Either way, that's one less obstacle posed by these pesky companies who refuse to play ball with Apple, and that's the beauty of the App Store. There really isn't any one indispensable app that makes or breaks the platform, and it turns out spotify and YouTube may not have as much leverage as people here initially thought they would.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mhnd
I just am not excited about Vision Pro. Seems so clunky I rather use my eyes to look around the real world. I’ll go to the Apple Store one day for a demo but I can’t help shake the feeling that this thing is an expensive $3500 tech demo
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.