As I noted above, there is no "specifically" involved. It's a generic patent. The primary claim that Apple is using against Samsung/Google is this:
- A computer-based system for detecting structures in data and performing actions on detected structures, comprising:
- an input device for receiving data;
- an output device for presenting the data;
- a processing unit coupled to the input device, the output device, and the memory for controlling the execution of the program routines.
= A computer with input and output.
- a memory storing information including program routines including
- an analyzer server for detecting structures in the data, and for linking actions to the detected structures;
= The idea of using common code to search for linkable data.
- a user interface enabling the selection of a detected structure and a linked action; and
- an action processor for performing the selected action linked to the selected structure; and
= The idea of presenting a link and taking an action when that link is selected by the user.
That's it. If you really are a software developer, you should be horrified that such a generic patent idea would ever be granted, much less used against anyone who independently implements it.
. Much of this is incidental. I can see you're really commited on this one, but it is truly trivial. Looking at several usb cords around here, the ones that need to be flexible have the thin cord. 
