Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

gooter80

macrumors member
Original poster
Apr 15, 2010
41
0
Which of the two would be faster, and which would you rather have?

15" with the i5 and a 7200rpm HDD (sub in whichever of the two i5's you like)
or
13" with the C2D and one of Apple's SSDs (again, sub whichever processor you like)

I only ask for the sake of conversation, and it is one thing I don't think I've seen discussed in much depth, although I admit I haven't seen every thread here.

So, what say you?:)
 
I'd say it depends on what you're doing. Sequential read writes are faster on the magnetic drive, but all other hard drive operations would be slower. I would say that the SSD would be faster if you're doing a lot of multitasking that has high disk access but low processor usage. On the other hand, if you are doing low I/O tasks (or high sequential I/O) that require a lot of processor (think video encoding or gaming) then the HDD and i5 combo is better.

Every day computing, probably the SSD combo.
 
The 13" with the SSD will feel (and be) faster in everyday use.
The 15" with the HDD will be faster at highly CPU-demanding stuff.

In any case: I wouldn't get a SSD from Apple directly. Aftermarket SSDs are better and cheaper.
 
I'm in the same boat. Purchase a 15'' with the high res screen and everything else default or the 13'' with an Intel g2 SSD and a some money left over for some extras.

It's such a tough choice!
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.