Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

dmonnin

macrumors regular
Original poster
Sep 13, 2014
147
30
Florida
I'm running scaled at 1440x900 and I think it looks great. Also is anyone hiding their dock for more space? I haven't yet but am thinking about it.
 
I'm running scaled at 1440x900 and I think it looks great. Also is anyone hiding their dock for more space? I haven't yet but am thinking about it.
Same resolution and I always hide my dock on the left side. Looks great and I haven't had any lag issues (yet).
 
I played with one for a bit in Best Buy at the more space setting (1440x900) and it ran without issues. I use the 1920x1200 on my 15" rMPB so I'm used to the smaller text
 
1440x900. That's one of the first thing I did, along with disabling "natural" scroll and setting the trackpad speed to the fastest available. My dock is still the default one, I need to change the icons first, then I'll decide what to do with it. On my MBA it's hidden at the bottom, and on the iMac it's fixed, small size, on the left. Will probably hide this one.

Now...... to find a name :p
 
1440x900. That's one of the first thing I did, along with disabling "natural" scroll and setting the trackpad speed to the fastest available. My dock is still the default one, I need to change the icons first, then I'll decide what to do with it. On my MBA it's hidden at the bottom, and on the iMac it's fixed, small size, on the left. Will probably hide this one.

Now...... to find a name :p

Disable natural scrolling? Say what!
 
Yup, disable natural (UNnatural ;) ) scrolling, turn on tap click! Although the new trackpad works so nicely that I'm finding myself using real clicks. The thing is Dark Art.
 
Hey, mind posting a screenshot of your desktop - just curious to see how small or manageable the UI elements would be using 1440x900 on a 12" display. Thanks. ^^
 
I reduced the resolution to the 1152x720 equivalent (quarter of the native resolution) so far. I think text just looks a little crisper, but it might be my imagination. I've also been using screen sharing to log into my Mac Mini server running at 1920x1200, which is clear and legible on the screen but very tiny.
 
Hey, mind posting a screenshot of your desktop - just curious to see how small or manageable the UI elements would be using 1440x900 on a 12" display. Thanks. ^^

here ya go
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2015-04-14 at 8.29.20 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2015-04-14 at 8.29.20 PM.png
    855.8 KB · Views: 424
Really? I love it. I never knew so many people hated it. To me it feels...natural.

Same to me, i guess i got used to it, never turned it off. I just tried and my muscle memory was like "huh" while trying to scroll.
 
So after a couple of hours spent reading stuff on the MB, I can confirm my resolution of choice is definitely the "more space" setting - 1440x900.

Also, I'm going to love that keyboard, although right now it's typo festival :D
 
Yup, disable natural (UNnatural ;) ) scrolling, turn on tap click!

First job on all Macs. If they had that as standard they'd sell a hell of a lot more of them. Amazing how many people hate that first about macs (and don't notice that you can right-click with a single button mouse too). See them walk away from the Mac stand straight away...
 
I would be interested in someone downloading switchresx, and running the display at the native resolution, then screenshot and tell us their findings.
 
Ok I'm confused about something.

Why do so many people "scale", or in other words lower the resolution of the display? I see this in the other sub forums here also.

People complain about the MBA not having a retina display, yet people lower the resolution of a beautiful retina screen.

I love the standard res of the retina display on my rMBP and couldn't imagine lowering it.
 
Yup, disable natural (UNnatural ;) ) scrolling, turn on tap click! Although the new trackpad works so nicely that I'm finding myself using real clicks. The thing is Dark Art.

Question for you: when you are tapping to click, do you want the taptic to disable?

(It was never possible to disable the hardware detent before, but now it is. Seems more elegant to me.)
 
Ok I'm confused about something.

Why do so many people "scale", or in other words lower the resolution of the display? I see this in the other sub forums here also.

People complain about the MBA not having a retina display, yet people lower the resolution of a beautiful retina screen.

I love the standard res of the retina display on my rMBP and couldn't imagine lowering it.

On retina displays, you have to scale unless you want extremely tiny UI elements. On previous retina Macs, the screen has always been a 2x scaling of the standard setting, but on the retina MacBook (as well as the iPhone 6 Plus), the physical screen pixels aren't an integer multiple (2x) of the default resolution.

And it doesn't really need to be. It just needs to be sharp enough that you can't reasonably notice the difference in sharpness, like you do on non-retina displays.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.