Kevin Rose Updated iPhone Rumors!

Discussion in 'iPhone' started by jcostaman, Mar 16, 2009.

  1. jcostaman macrumors member

    jcostaman

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2008
    Location:
    Sacramento, CA
  2. NT1440 macrumors G4

    NT1440

    Joined:
    May 18, 2008
    Location:
    Hartford, CT
    #2
    well, we have "confirmation" but good news all around i guess.
     
  3. theDUB macrumors 6502a

    theDUB

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2008
    Location:
    SLT, CA
  4. NT1440 macrumors G4

    NT1440

    Joined:
    May 18, 2008
    Location:
    Hartford, CT
    #4
    Hes been right before a few times (and wrong a few).

    Apparantly he started digg (whatever that is) so hes got connections?
     
  5. eyefoniac macrumors 6502

    eyefoniac

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2008
    Location:
    Everywhere and nowhere
    #5
    Hmm, well the rumors are pretty much repeating themselves so I guess we will just have to wait for the official word in . . . roughly 12 hours.
     
  6. dlamin517 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2008
    #6
    i love rumors. they are meaningless until the actual events.
     
  7. ViPa macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2007
  8. sushi Moderator emeritus

    sushi

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2002
    Location:
    キャンプスワ&#
    #8
    True.

    Hopefully tomorrow will bring us some good news.
     
  9. cwwilson macrumors 65816

    cwwilson

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2009
    Location:
    Oklahoma City, OK
    #9
    Wasn't the reason Apple didn't support MMS was because they want people to move away from outdated (and costly) technology and promote the use of email on phones? I guess they gave in to the number of people complaining about not having it.

    Guess their plan didn't work.
     
  10. NT1440 macrumors G4

    NT1440

    Joined:
    May 18, 2008
    Location:
    Hartford, CT
    #11
    A classic example of someone taking forum people's rationalizations as Apple's words.

    Apple never said that, only people here.
     
  11. acfusion29 macrumors 68040

    acfusion29

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2007
    Location:
    Toronto
    #12
    Umm... are you serious? :eek:
     
  12. NT1440 macrumors G4

    NT1440

    Joined:
    May 18, 2008
    Location:
    Hartford, CT
    #13
    I vaguely know what it is, but hate most aspects of web 2.0 so yes, very serious.

    From what ive seen its a place where people vote if they like stuff.....
     
  13. TuffLuffJimmy macrumors G3

    TuffLuffJimmy

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2007
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    #14
    This is the internet and you don't know what digg is? Come on! Do you know what Rickrolling, or ******.ce is?

    edit: apparently you can't even write that goat one without being censored.
     
  14. NT1440 macrumors G4

    NT1440

    Joined:
    May 18, 2008
    Location:
    Hartford, CT
    #15
    Lol yes, but I dont enjoy things like facebook or digg.

    Im quite up to date with most memes thank you very much.
     
  15. dissdnt macrumors 65816

    dissdnt

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2007
    #16
    Because he's king of the interwebs! He is... the Dark Tipper..
     
  16. iJesus macrumors 6502a

    iJesus

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2007
    Location:
    Reno, Nevada
    #17
    This time tomorrow we'll all know.

    I love how Kevin says "and there's another feature but I've gotten conflicting reports" and leaves us questioning what that other feature is.

    Oh boy. ;)
     
  17. yetanotherdave macrumors 68000

    yetanotherdave

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2007
    Location:
    Bristol, England
    #18
    Umm, Web 2.0 isn't an actual thing or standard, it's a term chucked around by hacks who don't really know what they are talking around, and they seem to loosely apply it to any post "dot-com boom era" start up, social networking site, site that uses AJAX and CSS, or that has a logo with rounded edges.
     
  18. TuffLuffJimmy macrumors G3

    TuffLuffJimmy

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2007
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    #19
    He never said it was a standard. He just used it in a sentence.

    Maybe you should brush up on your web 2.0 knowledge before calling and irrelevant (to the conversation) foul on someone. You do realize that AJAX isn't a single technology, right? It's just javascript and XML. That's like saying a website is written in sproutcore. It doesn't make sense. Don't talk when you have no idea what you're talking about.
     
  19. Warbrain macrumors 603

    Warbrain

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2004
    Location:
    Chicago, IL
    #20
    He's been wrong enough times for me to not believe him. We'll know tomorrow.
     
  20. lindsayanng macrumors 68000

    lindsayanng

    Joined:
    May 4, 2008
    Location:
    East Haven, CT
    #21
    There is a definition of "web 2.0" although its a vague one and people disagree on it.. but the general consensus and what i think he is talking about is the "social media web 2.0"

    I mean, there are entire conferences based on web 2.0.

    If oyu ask me, its a crock and i think people take it WAY too far. I mean these web 2.0 people are like "hey, lets make a website where people can log in adn be friends with each other" but the website itself has no REAL purpose.

    like Digg

    or

    technorati

    don't get me wrong, my blogs are on both, but still. In the grand scheme of things, they are just blog directories or content directories
     
  21. yetanotherdave macrumors 68000

    yetanotherdave

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2007
    Location:
    Bristol, England
    #22
    I know what web 2.0 is and did actually look at that before posting. It seems very odd to "hate" all aspects of an relatively abstract concept with no defineable features or charecteristics that differentiate it from things you don't hate.

    Sorry, was I missing something there?
     

Share This Page