It will get ugly, KK owns big stakes in many franchises...stubeeef said:Good point! It just hurts to see so many good locals take it on the chin because of the greed of a few at the top. what makes it harder is that livengood will probably not even get a pimpslap over this.
Officers have owned big stakes in new stores, and self-dealed...
They have run buy-backs through off-sheet financing (aka Enron)
No telling what liability they have to any franchise that goes belly up, since they are after all active partners (along with some of the KK officers sticking themsleves into the equation at one point) in the operations which generally opens up some financial liability. (aka, the deepest pocket syndrome)
...Said BB&T analyst Wolf: "Dallas seemed to be within the parameters that Krispy Kreme laid out as to what they'll pay" for franchises. "It's probably toward the high end, yet the risk was toward the low end because (the market) was already running well."
Krispy Kreme has stumbled on occasion as a public company, unwittingly stepping into shareholder criticism for actions that it took for granted as a private firm. In 2002, a magazine questioned its use of a $30 million off-book synthetic lease, leading to a wave of negative media coverage.
Seeking to avoid future conflicts of interest, the company in 2002 moved to separate its current roster of officers from potentially profitable relationships with franchises. In March of that year, the company acquired for nearly $1 million from its officers the so-called Krispy Kreme Equity Group, which allowed senior executives to invest in new franchise operations...