Kuo also expects Samsung to fulfill some of the 5G modem orders in select markets.
Great. More random-chance iPhone purchases, again.
Kuo also expects Samsung to fulfill some of the 5G modem orders in select markets.
As mentioned in this thread already, the Samsung part can be considered news. It was speculated before, but this is the first time someone like Ming Chi Kuo is flat out stating Samsung is a supplier.Is it a rumor after a publicly announced 6 year deal with Qualcomm?
And that's the definition of anecdotal. If you polled 100,000 people, how many do you think would know what modem is in their iPhone?Has Apple not learned from dual-sourcing their modems? Some people don’t want the inferior modems, they want Qualcomm. I know I’d rather have theirs than anyone else’s.
Yes, but that doesn’t mean they shouldn’t know. I bet if they did know and could choose which one, they wouldn’t choose the inferior one. And that’s my point.And that's the definition of anecdotal. If you polled 100,000 people, how many do you think would know what modem is in their iPhone?
5G on a phone is overkill, especially if you're on a contract with data limits anyway. I'm most interested in how 5G can replace wired home connections and allow more connected devices in general.
The point is people in general don't know and most people really don't care. History already tells us that.Yes, but that doesn’t mean they shouldn’t know. I bet if they did know and could choose which one, they wouldn’t choose the inferior one. And that’s my point.
Interestingly, that's exactly what people said about LTE before the iPhone got LTE.5G on a phone is overkill, especially if you're on a contract with data limits anyway. I'm most interested in how 5G can replace wired home connections and allow more connected devices in general.
I think the Intel/QCOM modem debate is largely speculative and incremental if there are even noticeable differences.Yes, but that doesn’t mean they shouldn’t know. I bet if they did know and could choose which one, they wouldn’t choose the inferior one. And that’s my point.
If true, Kuo just blew a huge hole in the theory that Apple came crawling back to Qualcomm on its knees and was forced to settle in order to have 5G in 2020.
That said, it doesn’t really make sense that Apple would add Samsung as a modem supplier. 1) The whole point of dual sourcing is to reduce supply risk and gain pricing leverage. Neither should be necessary since Apple just negotiated a multi-year supply agreement. TSMC will have no issue cranking out the necessary quantity. 2) To get the reported $8-9 royalty rate for Qualcomm’s baseband chips—cheaper than the $7.50 Apple was paying for 3G modems in the 2007-2011 timeframe, and certainly no more than the 4G modems in the 2013 agreement, Qualcomm would have wanted exclusivity. 3) Samsung had been playing hard to get, recently claiming they couldn’t sell their 5G modems to Apple because they were unable to manufacture sufficient quantity. 4) Apple is making their own baseband chip, why would they bother second sourcing them for the short period of time they’ll need to rely on anyone else at all?
I think this is the reason Apple is putting three cameras in the iPhone this year. That would push a lot of people to buy IMO.So basically, there will be almost no reason for people to get an iPhone XI this year.
Yup. Plus the 7 Plus has a higher pixel density than the XR, has dual cameras (one more than the XR), and has 3 GB RAM (same as the XR). The mainstream iPads didn't even get 3 GB until 2019. The 7 Plus had 3 GB RAM 3 years ago.Good thing I replaced my iPhone 7 Plus battery back in December for $29.99. Going to ride this until 2020.![]()
Yeah, cuz billions of dollars of potential revenue mean nothing.Surprised anyone would do business with Apple after they've thrown so many suppliers under the bus.
Agreed. I see these insane speed tests from people who are getting 150+ Mbps down and up on AT&T and Verizon’s LTE networks all the time. Meanwhile, I can’t get above 30 Mbps down/2 Mbps up on LTE anywhere around the two-county area where I live, which has a population of nearly 2 million people.We can't even properly utilize 4K TVs for broadcasted TV...It's still freaking 1080i. 5G is going to be years before it's even useful consistently.
Our population is over 8M and there are places within the city LTE isn't even available on ATT, lol. Other places, it's 3-5MB in the heart of the city. It's a joke.Agreed. I see these insane speed tests from people who are getting 150+ Mbps down and up on AT&T and Verizon’s LTE networks all the time. Meanwhile, I can’t get above 30 Mbps down/2 Mbps up on LTE anywhere around the two-county area where I live, which has a population of nearly 2 million people.
I’d rather see the mobile providers invest in getting LTE reaching its full capabilities across their entire footprint before dumping billions into a 5G network that no one can even use and won’t even be available outside of a couple “select cities” until who knows when...probably 2024.
Will be another 10+ years till we can properly utilise 5G.
Indeed. My carrier (Rogers/Fido) is already testing 5G in my city (Toronto), and the true rollout is planned for late 2019 to 2020 (which is good timing for a 2020 iPhone).maybe you should move out of the sticks! lol