Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I wouldn’t be surprised if there are plenty of people who would upgrade from their iPhone 11/12/13/14 right now, but just dont see any major reason to.

If Apple AI came when it was announced and showed off some decent examples of its integration the. Our household would have upgraded from a 12mini and 13pro already.
You may be right, but it *does* sound like between this years iPhone Air and next years iPhone Fold, there are going to be plenty of hardware features that will interest people significantly more than AI ever could.
 
I find the apple intelligence features on my iPhone and Mac mostly useful. I don’t think the average person really cares that much. Siri works great for the tasks like dictation,reading text messages and HomeKit actions. That is 99% of what people want and uses Siri for. You can always say “hey siri ask ChatGPT…..”

Kuo is very good at manipulating stock prices with his “apple is doomed” statements. This smells a lot like that.

It’s absurd that people in forums pile on Apple while they are hugely profitable and their phones are selling extremely well. Proof of the pudding is in the eating.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kal Madda
Is there a single Apple Intelligence feature that isn’t just a gimmick?

Genuine question.
I genuinely use the writing tool to make concise maybe one or two times each day. Others might find it useless, but I find it helpful because I tend to ramble on and on and on and on and on and........;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kal Madda
Is there a single Apple Intelligence feature that isn’t just a gimmick?

Genuine question.
None are personally useful for me. I turned it off, mostly so I could get the old Siri animation back as I find the new one to be a bit too intrusive and bright (especially in CarPlay).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Javert24601
Siri is not welcome in my home.

My current phone does not support Apple AI, or whatever it's called.

When I choose to upgrade to an iPhone that does support AI, I will immediately turn it off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DianaofThemiscyra
Is there a single Apple Intelligence feature that isn’t just a gimmick?

Genuine question.
I use proofreading in Writing Tools, and ChatGPT integration with Siri quite often. They are both very useful for my workflow. 👍🏻
 
Good. Sick of AI cannibalizing everything even though it's largely been foisted upon us with, for the moment, limited use cases for the median consumer. Particularly when it looked like last year's iPad OS update got entirely bulldozed to make way for AI features (that we ended up not even getting).
Yeah, but Apple was always like "we'll release it when it's ready". It seems this caught them by surprised, so they rushed it, rushed the feature set preview and said it would be out by this time.

Marketed the crap out of the features to push the iPhone 16 generation. It now may end up being that iPhone 16's won't be able to run some of these features a few down the road, because the hardware may not be good enough.

I guess it'll be "Built for Apple Intelligence V2".
 
They had very little to use to market the iPhone 16 line, so they went heavy on an unfinished AI. Really embarrasing.

Luckily for them they have a cool new thin model this fall and a folding model next year.

But regardless Apple Intelligence needs to come through at some point. Still a mark on their legacy.
The 17 “Air” may not be that cool if Apple relies solely on the thinness angle to sell it. It will need something that can actually wow people like a more capable single lens camera, maybe with a mechanical aperture. As for the folding phone, I don’t think it will be ready next year.
 
I find the apple intelligence features on my iPhone and Mac mostly useful. I don’t think the average person really cares that much. Siri works great for the tasks like dictation,reading text messages and HomeKit actions. That is 99% of what people want and uses Siri for. You can always say “hey siri ask ChatGPT…..”

Kuo is very good at manipulating stock prices with his “apple is doomed” statements. This smells a lot like that.

It’s absurd that people in forums pile on Apple while they are hugely profitable and their phones are selling extremely well. Proof of the pudding is in the eating.
Yeah, a lot of these people come across like they dislike Apple in the first place and are just looking for something to whine about. Tech writers want to spin this into an artificial scandal like Apple never really intends on releasing the features, or that they never worked on them, when clearly all of the evidence we have indicates that they were in fact working on them, and were likely even close to release, but ran into issues requiring reworking that will delay the release. Gurman cited sources inside Apple saying that the features were planned for release in 18.4, then he cited internal sources again saying the features had been delayed to 18.5. We have zero reason to believe that these features aren’t in development, and we have several reasons to believe they are, despite these people’s wild unfounded claims…
 
Yeah, but Apple was always like "we'll release it when it's ready". It seems this caught them by surprised, so they rushed it, rushed the feature set preview and said it would be out by this time.

Marketed the crap out of the features to push the iPhone 16 generation. It now may end up being that iPhone 16's won't be able to run some of these features a few down the road, because the hardware may not be good enough.

I guess it'll be "Built for Apple Intelligence V2".
There are zero indicators the iPhone 16 hardware is incapable of running the features. This is merely wild conjecture with zero evidence or reason to believe it…
 
Yeah, but Apple was always like "we'll release it when it's ready". It seems this caught them by surprised, so they rushed it, rushed the feature set preview and said it would be out by this time.

Marketed the crap out of the features to push the iPhone 16 generation. It now may end up being that iPhone 16's won't be able to run some of these features a few down the road, because the hardware may not be good enough.

I guess it'll be "Built for Apple Intelligence V2".
Maybe that’s the reason we’re getting 12GB on the 17 Pro and 17 Pro Max. Apple’s current implementation of AI is already outdated and the version Apple really wants to release will leave all current devices with 8GB of RAM behind. I’m so glad I didn’t get the 16 Pro. We may even get 12GB of RAM on the 17 and 17 Air.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Kal Madda
Maybe that’s the reason we’re getting 12GB on the 17 Pro and 17 Pro Max. Apple’s current implementation of AI is already outdated and the version Apple really wants to release will leave all current devices with 8GB of RAM behind. I’m so glad I didn’t get the 16 Pro. We may even get 12GB of RAM on the 17 and 17 Air.
We don’t even know that the 17 Pro or 17 Pro Max will get 12GB RAM, those are just rumors. And even if they’re true, that doesn’t mean the Apple Intelligence features won’t support 8GB iPhones. More wild conjecture with zero evidence to support it, and no reason to believe it…
 
  • Haha
Reactions: rmadsen3
Yes, there are a lot of Android smartphones coming out these days with 12 GB RAM + 256/512 GB for apps/datas. And often these phones provide SD card slots.
Are you saying that the extra RAM and storage is there for AI, but can be used for anything you want, which is a bonus? I'm not understanding how AI is the reason you'd buy one of those phones.
 
With very limited features and language support, it will be a long time before it is really useful. For the immediate future, only hardware features will drive the sales.
 
Apple seems to have lost its mojo. Hardware needs improvement such as a foldable
Software as well as Apple Intelligence could be better
Does Apple really expect people to upgrade?
If done right and it’s not priced much more than a iPhone pro max, that could be interesting, but I think that is many years into the future.
I had hoped to for a good reason to upgrade my 13pro last year, maybe this year, but probably not :)
 
Forget about the business for a minute and go back to the product. Take an honest and very critical look at the product.

This is what Apple did when Steve returned. Most fluent in business and company management would NOT have looked favorably on what Apple was doing when Steve was given the reigns again.

Apple looked at the product and followed through on what the vision and their standards for said product were and executed. As a result, Apple flourished.
This also, again, reinforces the weakness of Tim Cook in that he does not have vision nor the technical expertise. I'm not saying that Tim Cook didn't bring something important to Apple, but he wasn't and isn't the "complete package". It is time for Apple to move on.
 
So we purposely made the iPhone 17 as ugly as possible to weed out the real suckers.
Seriously! If the mockups of iPhone 17 are real, I don't understand how anyone in Apple could think it was a great idea to make the camera bump BIGGER and cover the top 1/4th of the iPhone. Yes, the off center camera bump is annoying (that was Apple's first mistake), but don't double down on it. Just make the cameras horizontal across the top.
 
Most of us knew this last year already. No amount of paying Bella Ramsey for ads will fix this.

Apple is 2-3 years behind ChatGPT and Gemini, never mind leading edge stuff like DeepSeek. There is no way they're closing that gap so quickly. Data is the fuel for AI. Apple has none to feed it either.
Apple hasn't even built their AI server datacenter. And, they are sticking to AI on the device. I fully appreciate the commitment to privacy, but IMO that is putting the cart before the horse. If Apple is behind, build the LLM on robust servers with computational power and then move to the a privacy-focused device model.

Speaking of other AI engines, of the many things that Elon Musk has done, he did build that Grok datacenter right quick and led the Grok team to build IMO the leading AI engine. I thought all of this AI stuff was hype until I used Grok3 this past weekend on a personal project. It saved me countless of hours of research and gave me pros and cons of each option. I was impressed.
 
I find the apple intelligence features on my iPhone and Mac mostly useful. I don’t think the average person really cares that much. Siri works great for the tasks like dictation,reading text messages and HomeKit actions. That is 99% of what people want and uses Siri for. You can always say “hey siri ask ChatGPT…..”

Kuo is very good at manipulating stock prices with his “apple is doomed” statements. This smells a lot like that.

It’s absurd that people in forums pile on Apple while they are hugely profitable and their phones are selling extremely well. Proof of the pudding is in the eating.
"Siri works great" is a gross overstatement. I do use Siri, but I find it to be unreliable and poorly responsive when it works. I also have the "privilege" of Siri stop responding every so often, so I have to reboot my phone to get it to work again.

You have every right to overlook Apple's misrepresentation of "enhanced Siri", but the rest of us also have the right to hold Apple accountable for it. I think Kuo was spot on this time. I feel like I was sold a bill of goods. I could have waited for the next version of the iPhone because I bought 16PM for the enhanced Siri.

You also have to see what it represents. I used to think AI was a gimmick until I used Grok3 this past weekend for a personal project. I was impressed, and it radically changed my perspective. Apple is a dinosaur if it doesn't have AI, and I'm not even talking about "Siri layered on top of ChatGPT" sort of crap. I keep thinking of how short of a timespan it took Apple to change the mobile phone landscape. Arguably, it took 3 years., but for argument sake, let's say 5 years. Apple could be like Nokia in 5 years, so in 1-2 phone purchases. AI is progressing that quickly. Yes, Apple has that pile of cash, but once you are a dinosaur, it can only delay the inevitable for so long. People will want a functional AI on their next phone. I do!
 
"If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses." – supposedly Henry Ford
"A lot of times, people don't know what they want until you show it to them" – Steve Jobs

"many people" do not know what they want.
I'm not sure "not knowing what they want" is the same thing as "not having imagined something different". People could not have wanted a car if they hadn't imagined something like a car.

When it comes to AI, I think people want choices. I was literally someone who thought AI was a gimmick until this past weekend when I used Grok3 out of curiosity for a personal project. Now, I want AI but not for everything. I want AI on my terms. I don't need AI to summarize documents or emails, but someone else may. I just want AI to be available to help make some task easier or as a companion to make sure I stay on track or avoid a mistake, but someone else might think that is too intrusive.
 
We don’t even know that the 17 Pro or 17 Pro Max will get 12GB RAM, those are just rumors. And even if they’re true, that doesn’t mean the Apple Intelligence features won’t support 8GB iPhones. More wild conjecture with zero evidence to support it, and no reason to believe it…
If the 17 Pro and 17 Pro Max get 12GB, it will be for one of two reasons, maybe both. Those reasons would be the camera and/or AI which could possibly be enhanced in some way thanks to the extra memory. This place is called MacRumors so wild conjecture based on legit and not so legit sources is part of the package you’re getting when you come here. You could ignore these articles and wait for the real deal on September 9, 2025.
 
Yeah, a lot of these people come across like they dislike Apple in the first place and are just looking for something to whine about. Tech writers want to spin this into an artificial scandal like Apple never really intends on releasing the features, or that they never worked on them, when clearly all of the evidence we have indicates that they were in fact working on them, and were likely even close to release, but ran into issues requiring reworking that will delay the release. Gurman cited sources inside Apple saying that the features were planned for release in 18.4, then he cited internal sources again saying the features had been delayed to 18.5. We have zero reason to believe that these features aren’t in development, and we have several reasons to believe they are, despite these people’s wild unfounded claims…
What’s wrong with a little criticism from time to time, especially when it’s justified? Apple made AI the star of the show when they introduced the 16 lineup and marketed the hell out of it in their cringy commercials last year. This year they went radio silent. A brief statement would’ve been nice to give us a clearer picture. Maybe they’ll mention something during the 17 lineup presentation if it’s still not there yet?
 
Fast M chips with big leap on GPU and CPU, with neural processor and huge potential.. ends up doing nothing, as usual. At least nvidia rtx and AMD X3D chips are great for gaming. Oh well..
 
They've made tons of money since the introduction of the iPhone in 2006. It's time for them to take out their checkbooks and buy an entire industry and stop being losers.
 
What’s wrong with a little criticism from time to time, especially when it’s justified? Apple made AI the star of the show when they introduced the 16 lineup and marketed the hell out of it in their cringy commercials last year. This year they went radio silent. A brief statement would’ve been nice to give us a clearer picture. Maybe they’ll mention something during the 17 lineup presentation if it’s still not there yet?
Yep. The point of the whole iPhone 16 announcement was A.I. Remember what Tim said? Built from ground up around Apple Intelligence? 😁 Now we’re halfway from another iPhone launch and it’s nowhere near as promised.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dampfnudel
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.