Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
What sort of reduction in thickness will this likely achieve? We’re talking microns, surely. And even if all that saving was made available to battery the additional volume added is going to be minimal. Would it really make a significant difference to battery endurance? Seems like a very small gain set against a very new and possibly risky technology.
When the iPhone X came out, phones were using 10 layers of copper on the PCB. Stacked SLP was using 20. The more components that can be stacked vertically, the less horizontal area it takes up. This wouldn’t be just taking the current MB and making it thinner, this is taking into account that the MB can have more components in a smaller horizontal footprint and being able to take up more space with “other stuff”.
 
When the iPhone X came out, phones were using 10 layers of copper on the PCB. Stacked SLP was using 20. The more components that can be stacked vertically, the less horizontal area it takes up. This wouldn’t be just taking the current MB and making it thinner, this is taking into account that the MB can have more components in a smaller horizontal footprint and being able to take up more space with “other stuff”.
Those components still need to be there. They still take up volumetric space. Improved stacking efficiency might reduce PCB area which might make a more significant difference in space given over to PCB but again the savings are marginal. Incremental changes are important of course. It’s how progress often works. But I’m not seeing a significant change in available battery space. Not a change that would give rise to notable increases in battery endurance.
 
Why do I get the feeling that future iPhones (15 Pro included) are getting worse regarding quality and reliability. Look at the hasty switch to titanium on the 15 Pro and the crappy FineWoven case. Glad I cancelled my 15 Pro, still VERY happy with my 14 Pro. Besides the weight, it’s a stellar and impressive piece of technological engineering feat.
They want to keep the same price despite inflation and Apple isn’t absorbing the losses that’s for sure. They have to cut on something. Whether that’s using lower-grade parts in areas where user wouldn’t notice and generally having higher tolerances (nothing that’s manufactured is ‘perfect’ it’s just meant to stay within tolerances where it works) or they’re just letting loose of the QC a little. Still the vast majority of users will never have an issue which at the scale of Apple is the only thing that matters.
 
It isn't entirely clear if the benefit of this technology is worth the cost of its fragile and unproven use. I suspect that we'll see it in the iPad first, as iPads get thrown around much less than an iPhone.

It is exciting in the sense that much denser multi-layer circuit boards could be manufactured. They just have to work.
 
why can't Apple just make the phone thicker? That makes the camera bump shorter and way more volume for traditional circuit boards and battery
 
  • Like
Reactions: shpankey


iPhones will not adopt resin coated copper (RCC) foil for their printed circuit boards until 2025, according to Apple analyst Ming-Chi Kuo. Kuo says that Apple will not adopt this technology in 2024 because of its "fragile characteristics" and "inability to pass drop tests."

Apple-Silicon-Teal-Feature.jpg

If Apple and its supplier Ajinomoto can improve the RCC material before the third quarter of 2024, the high-end iPhone 17 models could use it. Resin coated copper does not sound exciting, but it has the potential to slim down the size of circuit boards, freeing up space inside of the iPhone that can be used for larger batteries or other technology. Kuo says that it also makes the drilling process easier for iPhone manufacturing because RCC is fiberglass-free.

Late last month, a Weibo circuit expert claimed that Apple would adopt RCC for circuit boards starting in 2024, but it appears that we might not see the shift until 2025.

Article Link: Kuo: iPhones Won't Adopt RCC for Thinner Circuit Boards Until 2025
„ … freeing up space inside of the ‌iPhone‌ that can be used for larger batteries or other technology.“ Hopefully, this would also mean „ … freeing up space inside of the ‌iPhone‌ that can be used for larger but *not heavier* batteries or other *lighter* technology.“
 
Is this the same Ajinomoto that makes MSG?
Yes. Ajinomoto was originally (and still partially is) a pharmaceutical company before it was a food company and it creates something called ABF that’s used for CPU insulation. It’s made using a byproduct of the MSG production process.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LlamaLarry
Until they can reduce the camera bump I do t really want the rest of the phone getting thinner. It’s like when someone loses a lot of weight and it takes a while to get rid of the gut, it looks worse than when they were just fat. I just upgraded to the new iPad Air, my first iPad with a camera bump, and it’s the worst part about the iPad, I don’t even use a camera, I’d love to get this iPad in a non rear camera option.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chuckeee
It seems to me all “Pro” are in a way the beta versions.

Pros will be given new tech, new materials, new features and Pro users will get to test them out.

The tried and true techs will pass down to the non pro models in a year or two or three.
 
Except if the circuit board overlaps itself, there is less real estate used by the circuit board and more for the battery.

Take a 1-story house, divide it into two, and put one half on top of the other. You can now have a bigger pool on the same lot.
Now you're thinking with portals!
 
Wonder how much battery capacity can increase due to this. Probably not much. Also don't think the thickness of iPhone will reduce much.
 
now you gotta worry about your circuit board shattering when dropping your phone.

no thanks.

wasn't this a common problem with.. I forget which model but iPhone 7's maybe?

Not 'shattered' but certain impact easily screwed them up iirc. Didn't personally impact me but thought I read about it
 
Yes. Ajinomoto was originally (and still partially is) a pharmaceutical company before it was a food company and it creates something called ABF that’s used for CPU insulation. It’s made using a byproduct of the MSG production process.

And yes it’s that Ajinomoto that makes MSGs.

They have a subsidiary called Ajinomoto Fine Techno that does more of chemical stuff that’s mainly non-food related.
Well, the bag of Ajinomoto in my pantry just got a little more fancy. ;)
 
  • Haha
Reactions: szw-mapple fan
The other day, I was holding my iPhone and was thinking... you know (you don't know), I really like the iPhone 15 Pro Max but what would get me to upgrade... a slightly thinner one.
 
Why do I get the feeling that future iPhones (15 Pro included) are getting worse regarding quality and reliability. Look at the hasty switch to titanium on the 15 Pro and the crappy FineWoven case. Glad I cancelled my 15 Pro, still VERY happy with my 14 Pro. Besides the weight, it’s a stellar and impressive piece of technological engineering feat.

They are definitely becoming the experimental line. Gruber made the good point that each Pro model is only made for exactly one year. The non-Pros are sold for years. Things come down to the non-Pro after being worked out on the Pro models.

Feel the same way about my 13 Pro. Gotten used to the weight, have Lightning cables, still a great phone.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.