Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

FlyingDutch

macrumors 65816
Aug 21, 2019
1,252
1,121
Eindhoven (NL)
Why would anyone that owns a iPhone 11 even buy an iPhone 12? The gap in performance has to be minuscule.

Looking forward to see how that 5.4" model pans out. Gonna be the deciding factor between me buying a new phone or just putting a new battery in my 2017 iPhone SE.
I’d like to buy a new iPhone every year even if it doesn’t really make sense.
 

diego.caraballo

macrumors 6502a
Oct 18, 2013
586
1,496
Hope is not the 6.7” getting exclusive features, like the plus models in the past, the cause of the complication. Unless is the LIDAR...
 

44267547

Cancelled
Jul 12, 2016
37,643
42,522
Hope is not the 6.7” getting exclusive features, like the plus models in the past, the cause of the complication. Unless is the LIDAR...

I think it’s obvious Apple will incorporate the majority of their newest technology into the largest/most expensive iPhone. Think about it, it’s the same trajectory they have always used with technology in there more expensive iPads, MacBooks, AirPods, etc. They want consumers to spend their money on their most expensive product, and of course the 6.7 iPhone won’t shy away from not including those features, where the models below the 6.7 inch iPhone won’t include some of those features. The reason being, if Apple would include a lot of the same features in the same iPhone models, then that would detract away from consumers spending their money on the most expensive iPhone, which is why Apple wants to use those features as a ‘lure‘ to persuade the consumer to buy the most expensive iPhone, which will be the 6.7 inch.
 

I7guy

macrumors Nehalem
Nov 30, 2013
33,082
22,274
Gotta be in it to win it
5G is not important for Apple. However, Apple can sell an external device like lightning to camera module which will be a good idea for people who want to use it for facetime calls on iPhone 12 until Apple can know how to integrate the camera under the screen.
Ridiculous off-topic post.
 
  • Like
Reactions: na1577

CarlJ

macrumors 604
Feb 23, 2004
6,963
12,121
San Diego, CA, USA
What's all the fuss about this mmWave? From what I understand you can only use it within line of sight from a tower unit and is very sensitive to even slight changes in unit orientation. So, how is this better than just plain old WiFi???
I think the answers are, crazy high speed, and plain old WiFi works only where you have login access (there's tons of WiFi around but it's nearly all private networks), whereas if your provider carpets the city with mmWave cells, then presumably you get that crazy high speed everywhere.

Personally, I'm in no big hurry to move on from LTE. More interested in all the other new (to me) features of the 12, especially the potential smaller one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gatortpk

The Game 161

macrumors Penryn
Dec 15, 2010
29,960
19,173
UK
I think it’s obvious Apple will incorporate the majority of their newest technology into the largest/most expensive iPhone. Think about it, it’s the same trajectory they have always used with technology in there more expensive iPads, MacBooks, AirPods, etc. They want consumers to spend their money on their most expensive product, and of course the 6.7 iPhone won’t shy away from not including those features, where the models below the 6.7 inch iPhone won’t include some of those features. The reason being, if Apple would include a lot of the same features in the same iPhone models, then that would detract away from consumers spending their money on the most expensive iPhone, which is why Apple wants to use those features as a ‘lure‘ to persuade the consumer to buy the most expensive iPhone, which will be the 6.7 inch.
Think it’s the normal thing to do across the tech market too
 

Analog Kid

macrumors G3
Mar 4, 2003
8,514
10,437
I suspect they could delay this by years before it has any real impact on user experience. The only reason to try to ship anything right now is pure data sheet envy...
 

Baymowe335

Suspended
Oct 6, 2017
6,640
12,451
AirPower says hey.
One counter example amidst the many other delivered? And btw, that’s likely still happening.
[automerge]1587503471[/automerge]
Heard on the biz news today the word is Apple is telling suppliers it will need something like 212 million phones made. Make of that what you will with the new models and everything. I simply quoted you on this as you are one of the few on this site able to digest and understand these type of numbers.
They sold something like 230M iPhone 6 at the peak of iPhone volume, but with new ASPs, 212M would be all time iPhone revenues.

I hope its true, but I am skeptical of any order whispers. Apple‘s supply chain has proven over and over to be nearly impossible to gauge.

Personally, I am not worried about demand for Apple products in the medium to long term, particularly with likely record services incoming. Even short term, plenty of people are still working at home and most of the high earners can do so. Even those who can’t will never give up their phones and might even spend their stimulus checks on them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jbachandouris

Falhófnir

macrumors 603
Aug 19, 2017
6,139
6,982
iPhone 4S and iPhone XR launched in October. iPhone X launched in November. It's not like this is totally unprecedented, and not that bad of a rumored delay considering the challenges the world is facing.
The article is saying not even going into production until October - usually iPhones launching in September will go into production in June, so this might not be available until January, even!
 
  • Like
Reactions: BiscoDino

Icaras

macrumors 603
Mar 18, 2008
6,343
3,380
Starting to get a bad feeling that only the larger 6.7" (Max) phone will get the new "iPad Pro" case design that has been rumored. That would be really disappointing. Count me among those who want as small a phone as possible, but would love this new design.

I totally don’t think this will happen. The 6.1” Pro will definitely get same redesign. The question that I keep asking however is if only the Pro models will get the redesign and not the non Pro models, which for the first time, is something I’m seriously considering as a possibility.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gatortpk and na1577

Falhófnir

macrumors 603
Aug 19, 2017
6,139
6,982
I totally don’t think this will happen. The 6.1” Pro will definitely get same redesign. The question that I keep asking however is if only the Pro models will get the redesign and not the non Pro models, which for the first time, is something I’m seriously considering as a possibility.
I've always thought that was likely to be the case - in the same way the X was a redesign, but the 8 and 8 plus carried on with the previous design. New design debuts on top model(s), then trickles down to the rest of the lineup over time. Just going OLED and gaining 5G plus a new smaller size will probably be considered quite a big deal for the 12 and (12 plus?) over the 11.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Icaras

Icaras

macrumors 603
Mar 18, 2008
6,343
3,380
I've always thought that was likely to be the case - in the same way the X was a redesign, but the 8 and 8 plus carried on with the previous design. New design debuts on top model(s), then trickles down to the rest of the lineup over time. Just going OLED and gaining 5G plus a new smaller size will probably be considered quite a big deal for the 12 and (12 plus?) over the 11.

Yes, and in a marketing perspective, it makes sense for every tier to have its own separate design language, like as you mentioned with the SE, to differentiate between the models more clearly. iPhone Pro and iPad Pro Models will share the exact design, and with the rumor of the iPad Air getting an all screen design, that would be better matched with the non pro iPhone 12 design, while the low cost iPad would retain top and bottom bezels as well as the home button like the SE.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Falhófnir

Dwalls90

macrumors 603
Feb 5, 2009
5,421
4,372
I wouldn’t buy a 5G-enabled phone unless it gives me the option to disable 5G. Hopefully that’ll be baked into the new iOS.

This was a feature when the LTE iPhones came out.
[automerge]1587521259[/automerge]
The article is saying not even going into production until October - usually iPhones launching in September will go into production in June, so this might not be available until January, even!

You do realize most iPhones don't really start assembly until 2-3 weeks before the date they go on sale? Even if they started production on 10/1, we could still have stock available in stores by end of October.

Apple isn't stockpile producing these for months in advance. That's why we rarely get tangible supply chain leaks until very close to the actual announcement.
 

ksec

macrumors 68020
Dec 23, 2015
2,167
2,498
Exactly.

I'm a Verizon customer. But since Verizon has decided to go with the mmWave flavor of 5G... I'll probably never use it.

I'm rarely in a downtown environment where these 5G nodes are on poles lining the streets. Same for stadiums and arenas.

You're right... mmWave is very finicky in terms of distance and obstructions. You need to be within a couple hundred feet of a 5G node... and in clear sight.

Meanwhile... the other carriers are using a different flavor of 5G that broadcasts a couple miles from a tower. It's similar to the way 4G/LTE works.

Granted... the other 5G isn't as fast as mmWave... but you also don't need to be standing within sight of a node.

I dunno... I've never had an issue with plain ol' 4G. The only times I have a problem with a connection is when I literally have a problem with a connection. Think a "cabin in the woods" scenario.

But if I don't have 4G in my vacation cabin... I probably won't have 5G either.

So overall... I'm pretty "meh" on 5G... particularly since I'm on Verizon with their boneheaded mmWave implementation.

Chances are I'll be using 4G most of the time anyway... even if I have a 5G phone in a supposed 5G area.

I will be upgrading to a new iPhone this Fall... but 5G is not at the top of my list of needs/wants.

Verizon with have "Sub 6" 5G at later date using DSS ( Dynamic Spectrum Sharing ) . My guess is that it would go along side with iPhone 5G launches.
[automerge]1587531779[/automerge]
I still think it only make sense to not launch iPhone with mmWave support at all. Especially considering the amount of internal space it takes, and splitting the lineup into mmWave and non-mmWave or only 6.7" gets mmWave and 6.1" gets nothing isn't very Apple like line up.

But then Ming seems to be sure of this mmWave happening. So I guess Apple intends to push forward for whatever reason. 802.11ay ( mmWave for WiFi ) is done but it doesn't seems Qualcomm or Broadcom has a readily available solution on offer, so that rule out the possibility.

I thought about launching carrier specific model for mmWave, but that is even more messy and is like back into CDMA era.

I guess we will have to wait and see how this get played.
 
Last edited:

cmaier

Suspended
Jul 25, 2007
25,405
33,467
California
Why would anyone that owns a iPhone 11 even buy an iPhone 12? The gap in performance has to be minuscule.
Bigger screen, smaller bezels, smaller notch, 120Hz refresh, better cameras with bigger sensors/lower noise/lidar autofocus/hardware stabilization/sensor-shift , new design, 20% CPU speed improvement, faster wireless charging, 3D lidar scanner, faster faceid, landscape faceid, pixel shift for super-hi-res, more RAM.
 

ConfluxNZ

macrumors member
Jul 15, 2016
57
65
Forever travelling
I suspect whatever small number of 6.7” iPhones get produced will be allocated to iPhone upgrade program participants in the first instance. Apple is going to need to ramp up that production pipeline quickly if they want to make the most of the holiday season sales.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jbachandouris

MacBH928

macrumors G3
May 17, 2008
8,134
3,626
honestly, they can totally skip on the 5G thing this year and no one will notice. For most of the world there are no 5G coverage, and using 5G does not change any of your phone experience. You will only notice it when downloading GBs of files which I am assuming the Tweeters and Instagramers are not doing.

Sincerely,
5G User
 

CarlJ

macrumors 604
Feb 23, 2004
6,963
12,121
San Diego, CA, USA
Bigger screen, smaller bezels, smaller notch, 120Hz refresh, better cameras with bigger sensors/lower noise/lidar autofocus/hardware stabilization/sensor-shift , new design, 20% CPU speed improvement, faster wireless charging, 3D lidar scanner, faster faceid, landscape faceid, pixel shift for super-hi-res, more RAM.
Yeah, but aside from that is there any real change?

P.S. Haven't seen you around in a while - glad you're back (if that's the case).
 

incoherent_1

macrumors 65816
Oct 19, 2016
1,160
2,221
This was a feature when the LTE iPhones came out.
[automerge]1587521259[/automerge]

Disabling 5G was a feature when LTE came out? ;)

Just kidding. I know the option exists for LTE; I just hope they extend it to 5G :) I think there are a variety of reasons (even more so than LTE) why people would preferring having this option.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CanyonLizard

DCIFRTHS

macrumors 65816
Jan 25, 2008
1,174
586
Verizon with have "Sub 6" 5G at later date using DSS ( Dynamic Spectrum Sharing ) . My guess is that it would go along side with iPhone 5G launches.

Isn’t there supposed to be a public C band auction, in December, that will include a significant amount midband spectrum (300 MHz before a 20 Mhz buffer)? I seriously doubt Verizon would sit that one out like they did with the 600 MHz band...

EDIT: added bandwidth
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.