Rip off. Just sell me the enclosure for $150.
This. Particularly when they're selling regular (slow) hard drives that won't really take advantage of the speed of the bus, when for many users SSD makes much more sense.
Rip off. Just sell me the enclosure for $150.
Even when you're transferring from one external to another external the speed will only match the speed of the Hard drive.
This is why I don't get Thunderbolt. There has to be a new design for hard drives. Even faster read/writes that SSD's.
$400 for two 500GB drives and a thunderbolt connection? Ouch
Edit: FYI two drives are available for $60 each on newegg. $340 for TB?
Also can't use a nonthunderbolt display...If you want to use a macbook pro with a regular non thunderbolt monitor you have to decide whether to use the thunderbolt drive or a regular display. You can't have both unless you have a thunderbolt monitor as well. That stinks.
![]()
The Thunderbolt port is backwards compatible with the mini-displayport.
As far as I've read not on other drives. Only if the monitor is the first in the chain, but if you have a monitor plugged in, you no longer have a thunderbolt drive to use if you have a regular mini-display port adapter plugged in. You can't plug your minidisplay port into the thunderbolt drive.
As far as I've read not on other drives. Only if the monitor is the first in the chain, but if you have a monitor plugged in, you no longer have a thunderbolt drive to use if you have a regular mini-display port adapter plugged in. You can't plug your minidisplay port into the thunderbolt drive.
As far as I've read not on other drives. Only if the monitor is the first in the chain, but if you have a monitor plugged in, you no longer have a thunderbolt drive to use if you have a regular mini-display port adapter plugged in. You can't plug your minidisplay port into the thunderbolt drive.
Data Transfer Rate : HDD:
7200rpm: 180MB/s / 180MB/s
5400rpm: 190MB/s / 190MB/s
SSD:
480MB/s / 245MB/s
2) Why the heck is 5400rpm faster than 7200rpm?
Yes.
A standard mechanical hard drive these days can push data at well over 100MB/s. This LaCie design places two in parallel, doubling the throughput.
In the real world, FW800 maxes out at 65MB/s.
So expect these to be 3 or more times faster than FW800.
Sneakz said:Yes.
A standard mechanical hard drive these days can push data at well over 100MB/s. This LaCie design places two in parallel, doubling the throughput.
In the real world, FW800 maxes out at 65MB/s.
So expect these to be 3 or more times faster than FW800.
FW800 maxes out at 100MB/s for real world transfer rates of just short of 90MB/s. 65 is not even close.
That's an excellent way of putting it.The bleeding edge has always been expensive.
Sounds bad, but there's also the RAID controller,
Thunderbolt showed its promise today for me. We had to go to the Apple Store for my wife's MBA and I forgot to do a full backup before we left. Connected it to my iMac via TB and copied 205GB in under an hour. In fact, it was waiting on my iMac's HD more than anything as I watched the disk access.
I don't get it.
Apple is catering less to the pro's, yet insist on a technology that is utter expensive for cost of entry.
Just regular 3.5inch mechanical SATA drives (2 in a RAID 0 stripe).
Edit: Actually I think it uses 2.5inch drives.