Mine never breaks, coming from an Acer (though some minor stuff got dysfunctional in the end), an MBP 2008, an MBA 2011. I replace my laptops every 2-3 years.
Utter nonsense. It's mildly annoying that RAM isn't upgradeable, but RAM is also joining the point where the benefits are no longer obvious, just like CPU power for the most part. With high speed SSDs, the idea that more RAM is going to be needed for adequate performance within the usable life of any computer manufactured today is pretty silly.Not to mention the new retina design goes against the modularity patterns that apply to any science field such as electronics, computer science, architecture,...etc. They basically introduced the buy and throw in 3 years pattern (expect less if you don't purchase the applecare).
In what way? It's virtually impossible to distinguish the two on those uses and neither machine is pushed anywhere near its performance limits. Plenty of 2008 and 2009 MBPs out there running just fine. With an SSD installed, you'd have to benchmark the computers to tell them apart without more demanding workloads.Given how dramatically the performance of the computers changes within generations, longevity of a laptop is really the last question in my book. Old computers have their niche uses of course, but I wouldn't want to own a 3 years old laptop as my main computer. Even for basic tasks like email checking, web browsing and text processing, the current Air will provide a better user experience then the most expensive 2009 MBP
If they were "fully capable" of running the newest version, they would. There aren't any age-based cutoffs alone. It's just that features built on newer technology are not backported when the older hardware does it differently or not as well.That statement is 100% accurate. Apple does push you to new hardware by way of dropping support in OSX of older machines even if those machines are fully capable of running OSX.![]()
My old company ThinkPads were replaced about every three years. Most were still in great shape and could be used for many more years. Since I'm retired and buying it on my own dime, I expect to hang onto my 2 year old MBP for at least 3 more years. For personal use, a 5 to 6 year life cycle looks good, depending on use.
I'm not sure what your point is. I buy a new MBP every year. They've been great.
You must have had cheap notebooks.
My ThinkPads last just as long as my Macs.
THANK YOU, for being one of the only people to acknowledge this. It seems like all the apple fan boys on this forum are completely oblivious to their own brainwashed minds. I read all the time "Oh your MBP is at 103 degrees Celsius? That's totally fine, it doesn't shut off till 105so obviously it can't hurt your computer
Noobs
Not trying to bash you or anything, but my opinion is to the contrary. I completely treat my electronics like pets. Not in a weird way, but I treat them very well, and am careful (not just about nicks and stuff) with the way I handle them.
I give my computer at least 30-45 seconds to load up processes after a boot up.
Idk if it's just coincidence, but being gentle with devices, I've never once in my entire life had a device malfunction or break on me.
I disagree with this. For those who use their computer to the max every day, where you would notice the maximum threshold of one generation's performance to the next, I can see this being true. But for everyone else, I don't think so. I just cleaned up my laptop with a new utility program, uninstalled a couple games I don't play anymore, and honestly my computer feels 90% as fast as it was when I first bought it many years ago.
In what way? It's virtually impossible to distinguish the two on those uses and neither machine is pushed anywhere near its performance limits. Plenty of 2008 and 2009 MBPs out there running just fine. With an SSD installed, you'd have to benchmark the computers to tell them apart without more demanding workloads.
Apples planned obsolescence will force you to replace it prematurely.
That's because they will stop supporting it when they feel like it. Usually after a few years.
Thats what your warranty is for. And please don't call me 'noob'. I was building computers since I was 10 years old![]()
I am sorry, but this is ridiculous. The computer is there to do stuff for me, not the other way around. Why should I wait for it to boot up? I want my machine to be instantly usable and instantly responsive. And this is what you get with latest technology. It improves your experience. You can do things more conveniently, without the stops and stumbles which you get on slow hardware.
First was a 2006 black macbook
I've owned 3 laptops, all Macs.
First was a 2006 black macbook, 2.0GHz Core Duo, the first model ever introduced. I was aware of the "early adopter" risk but this machine never had any problems
For me personally, with personal laptops, I've yet to have any actually die/break and end up being forced to replace it. That said, the oldest personal laptop in this house is 3 years old and that's a 17" HP. It's still going strong, but is rather slow compared to the newer laptops. Prior to that HP, it was all desktops. Again, never had any fail before being replaced by upgraded models and the old model being handed down to family members.
My MBP is just over a year old and I don't have any plans to replace it anytime soon, as with previous hardware I suspect at some point I'll want something newer/better and will pass it down to a family member. I have AppleCare for warranty and I have accidental damage and theft/disappearance insurance should it be dropped or lost.
Work laptops are a different story, but I will say a lot of people at work, including myself, had a lot of hardware problems with the first gen uni-body MBPs and I started to question their quality/reliability. I went through 3 different MBPs and their failures before I could persuade my IT guy to give me a newer model. The newer models resolved those issues and I haven't had any problems with reliability since.
I also had some Lenovo ThinkPads...I say "some" because they were always broken in some way and IT would have to replace it every few months. No physical damage or abuse, just random hardware faults/failures.
You have two of the exact same 15" MBPs, one retina and one without?
.... I use the cMBP for photo and video editing, music, games, basically just about everything not related to work.![]()
Just curious, why would you not use the retina display for visual editing? It seems more intuitive..?
Because as I mentioned, my cMBP is connected to an ATD (Apple Thunderbolt Display). Why would I use the Retina when I have that?![]()
![]()