Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
62,068
27,999


The MacBook Pro is available in 14-inch and 16-inch sizes, with three distinct models starting at $1,599, $1,999, and $2,499, so which should you choose?

m2-macbook-pro-pink.jpg

With a range of three similar models in the lineup to choose from, our guide helps to answer the question of how to decide which of these MacBook Pros is best for you. The three models are as follows:

  • 14-Inch MacBook Pro with M3: An entry-level model for users who need a machine that is more powerful and versatile than the MacBook Air.
  • 14-Inch MacBook Pro with M3 Pro or M3 Max: A more powerful, high-end model with a choice of performance-focused chips. It comes with one extra Thunderbolt port, higher memory bandwidth, larger quantities of memory, support for additional external displays, an 8TB storage option, and a Space Black color option, but loses four hours of battery life and the Space Gray color option.
  • 16-Inch MacBook Pro with M3 Pro or M3 Max: A model with identical specifications to the 14-inch model with the M3 Pro or M3 Max chips, but with a significantly larger display and four extra hours of battery life. It also gains High Power Mode to boost performance, but loses the ability to fast charge via USB-C.

Each MacBook Pro is configurable to add more a more powerful processor and larger quantities of memory and storage. Read on for a detailed break down of all of the differences between the three MacBook Pro models.

14-Inch MacBook Pro
(M3)
14-Inch MacBook Pro
(M3 Pro and M3 Max)
16-Inch MacBook Pro
14.2-inch display14.2-inch display16.2-inch display
0.61 inches thick (1.55 cm)0.61 inches thick (1.55 cm)0.66 inches thick (1.68 cm)
Weighs 3.4 pounds (1.55 kg)M3 Pro: Weighs 3.5 pounds (1.61 kg)
M3 Max: Weighs 3.6 pounds (1.62 kg)
M3 Pro: Weighs 4.7 pounds (2.14 kg)
M3 Max: Weighs 4.8 pounds (2.16 kg)
Configurations start with M3 with 8-core CPU and 10-core GPUConfigurations start with M3 Pro with 11-core CPU and 14-core GPUConfigurations start with M3 Pro with 12-core CPU and 18-core GPU
High Power Mode to boost M3 Max performanceHigh Power Mode to boost M3 Max performance
100GB/s memory bandwidthM3 Pro: 150GB/s memory bandwidth
M3 Max: 300GB/s or 400GB/s memory bandwidth
M3 Pro: 150GB/s memory bandwidth
M3 Max: 300GB/s or 400GB/s memory bandwidth
8GB, 16GB, or 24GB unified memoryM3 Pro: 18GB or 36GB unified memory
M3 Max: 36GB, 48GB, 64GB, 96GB, 128GB unified memory
M3 Pro: 18GB or 36GB unified memory
M3 Max: 36GB, 48GB, 64GB, 96GB, 128GB unified memory
Support for one external displayM3 Pro: Support for up to two external displays
M3 Max: Support for up to four external displays
M3 Pro: Support for up to two external displays
M3 Max: Support for up to four external displays
Two Thunderbolt / USB 4 (USB-C) portsThree Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C) portsThree Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C) ports
Fast charging over MagSafe 3 or USB-C portFast charging over MagSafe 3 or USB-C portFast charging over MagSafe 3 or USB-C port (with 240W cable only)
22-hour battery life when playing back video18-hour battery life when playing back video22-hour battery life when playing back video
Integrated 70-watt-hour lithium-polymer batteryIntegrated 72.4-watt-hour lithium-polymer batteryIntegrated 100-watt-hour lithium-polymer battery
70W USB-C Power Adapter70W USB-C Power Adapter (with M3 Pro with 11-core CPU)
96W USB-C Power Adapter (with M3 Pro with 12-core CPU or M3 Max, configurable with M3 Pro with 11-core CPU)
140W USB-C Power Adapter
512GB, 1TB, or 2TB storage512GB, 1TB, 2TB, 4TB, or 8TB storage512GB, 1TB, 2TB, 4TB, or 8TB storage
Available in Space Gray and SilverAvailable in Space Black and SilverAvailable in Space Black and Silver
Starts at $1,599Starts at $1,999Starts at $2,499


Display Size

The MacBook Pro is offered in 14.2-inch and 16.2-inch display sizes. The 16.2-inch display is a better replacement for a desktop machine and provides much more screen space to arrange multiple windows and use professional applications that benefit from the additional display area. The 14.2-inch display is still larger than the 13.3-inch MacBook Air and MacBook Pro models from recent years, and will likely be the best overall balance of needs for most users.

While the "notch" containing the webcam does eat into the display space very slightly, both displays are larger than MacBook Pro models from before 2021, so there is still more display area overall. In addition, the display area below the notch has an aspect ratio of exactly 16:10, just like previous MacBook Pro models, to ensure that the notch does not impede normal display views or watching media. On this basis, if you are concerned about the notch, you should not necessarily feel obliged to get the larger, 16-inch MacBook Pro. That being said, since the notch is the same size on both models, it may be slightly less noticeable on the 16-inch model.

Design

The 16-inch model is, of course, physically larger than the 14-inch model, with a markedly bigger overall footprint. It is also worth noting that the 16-inch model is also 0.13 cm thicker and up to 1.4 pounds (0.64 kg) heavier.

macbook-pro-sizes.jpg

The 14-inch MacBook Pro is decidedly more portable and comfortable than the 16-inch model to carry around on a daily basis. Though the 16-inch MacBook Pro can still fit in larger bags and is an acceptable size for travel, it is a much bigger, heavier machine. If you are considering the 16-inch MacBook Pro, you should make sure you are comfortable with its size and weight – especially if you plan to use it on the go.

Models with the M3 Pro and M3 Max chips are available in a new Space Black finish, so... Click here to read rest of article

Article Link: Late 2023 MacBook Pro Buyer's Guide: 14-Inch vs 16-Inch Models
 
Last edited:

fenderbass146

macrumors 65816
Mar 11, 2009
1,405
2,281
Northwest Indiana
I literally just got a 2019 16" a few days ago (used) and I plan on having it for the next 2-3 years. As of now I still rely on Windows VM's and Bootcamp a lot, but man am I excited about the 14". I've always liked the smaller form factor but always needed the power of the bigger models. I'm so excited the more portable option is a no comprmise performance monster like it's big brother. I love where Apple is going. I really hope official Windows ARM comes along so I can run it in VM's and x64 emulation in said VM's. (Not ever expecting bootcamp/dualboot) If that happens it will be a no brainer for my next laptop to get one of these or the next gen version.
 
Last edited:

mrkkbb

macrumors regular
Jun 14, 2016
132
109
Not impressed with the weight, especially the 14", a step backwards. I just can't understand why the Mac mini was not updated with these new chips as well. That is what I'm waiting for. Still waiting on a non-experimental native silicon gfortran and Matlab -- 1 year later. Hopefully now that the intel is almost out of the Apple line-up, Mathworks will get the fire lit under them to hurry up. I suspect it all has to do with their numerical libraries being Fortran based.
 
Last edited:

StoneJack

macrumors 68020
Dec 19, 2009
2,220
1,352
I literally just got a 2019 16" a few days ago (used) and I plan on having it for the next 2-3 years. As of now I still rely on Windows VM's and Bootcamp a lot, but man am I excited about the 14". I've always liked the smaller form factor but always needed the power of the bigger models. I'm so excited the more portable option is a no comprmise performance monster like it's big brother. I love where Apple is going. I really hope official Windows ARM comes along so I can run it in VM's and x64 emulation in said VM's. If that happens it will be a no brainer for my next laptop to get one of these or the next gen version.
I have also 2019 Macbook Pro 13.3 inches and was thinking about upgrade to 14 inch. It is so powerful that now it seems like an overkill for my modest needs (i want portability and long battery life). But I also would want new MBP's incredible battery life...
 
  • Like
Reactions: luxx80

R3k

macrumors 65832
Sep 7, 2011
1,502
1,475
Sep 7, 2011
Oops, in my rush to buy the 14'' inch asap, I added the 96W USB-C Power Adapter to my base model configuration. :rolleyes:
 

StoneJack

macrumors 68020
Dec 19, 2009
2,220
1,352
Not impressed with the weight, especially the 14", a step backwards. I just can't understand why the Mac mini was not updated with these new chips as well. That is what I'm waiting for. Still waiting on a non-experimental native silicon gfortran and Matlab -- 1 year later. Hopefully now that the intel is almost out, Mathworks will get the fire lit under them to hurry up. I suspect it all has to do with their numerical libraries being Fortran based.
It is almost same weight as 13.3 inch MBP 2019.
 

kingtj1971

macrumors 6502
Feb 11, 2021
474
557
Alton, IL
I literally just got a 2019 16" a few days ago (used) and I plan on having it for the next 2-3 years. As of now I still rely on Windows VM's and Bootcamp a lot, but man am I excited about the 14". I've always liked the smaller form factor but always needed the power of the bigger models. I'm so excited the more portable option is a no comprmise performance monster like it's big brother. I love where Apple is going. I really hope official Windows ARM comes along so I can run it in VM's and x64 emulation in said VM's. If that happens it will be a no brainer for my next laptop to get one of these or the next gen version.

I've owned one of these since they came out in 2019.... 16" Core i9 2.4Ghz model w/32GB RAM and a 2TB SSD. IMO, it's basically the best Mac portable you can buy if you want to dual boot into Windows 10, and probably for Windows VMs too.

After hours of debate though, I pulled the trigger to pre-order one of these new 16" models and accepted Apple's trade-in credit for giving them this 2019 model back.

In my case, it's only because I have a really nice "gaming laptop" now with AMD RTX2080 graphics -- and it'll support Windows 11 with no problems, should I want to upgrade to that. I'm realizing that on the Mac side, my ideal setup would be having the Mac that runs the native OS X stuff as well as possible (and that increased battery life!). The other stuff can just be done on the other machine.

It's nice having "one tool to do it all" ... but not worth the compromises when the new M1 CPUs are this much more efficient on the Mac side.
 

sw1tcher

macrumors 601
Jan 6, 2004
4,953
15,796
Now I'm curious what the rumored redesigned MBA (for 2022) will be like. MagSafe? HDMI? Since it's more a mainstream consumer model, maybe even one USB A port?
 

solarmon

macrumors regular
Mar 12, 2015
248
285
These chips are for Apple's "Pro" machines. Apple is not targeting the Pro user with the Mac mini.

That said, I'd love to see a M1 Pro in the Mac mini as well.
I’m going to replace my ~2015 Mac mini with the 14” Mac Pro…for portability, first and foremost. The added ports were like they were reading my mind.
 

solarmon

macrumors regular
Mar 12, 2015
248
285
Apple is definitely going to get more purchases outta my wife and I, mainly due to Apple Card 12 and 24-month 0% payments. Love that. But go figure: they let me do the Watch for 24 months, but the 14” pro for only 12?!
 

mcilwraith

macrumors member
Oct 1, 2016
73
168
Glasgow
damn. im not sure which way to go. I have used 15" MBPs for about 20 years. was kind of waiting for the 16" but its very expensive. would I be happy with a 14"? its strictly a stay at home machine, so I dont need portability. and my eyes are going (age), I like the big screen, but cant use an external. 14" or 16"?? Hmmmm.
 

PowerGala

macrumors regular
Aug 26, 2016
201
272
Apple would have made it so much easier on me if they would have released a new Mini. Now I'm trying to figure out which one of the new laptops that I want. I kind of think the 16 inch is too big and I'm not sure if I really need 1TB of storage... Right now I'm leaning towards the $2500 14 inch configuration over the base model.
 

solarmon

macrumors regular
Mar 12, 2015
248
285
damn. im not sure which way to go. I have used 15" MBPs for about 20 years. was kind of waiting for the 16" but its very expensive. would I be happy with a 14"? its strictly a stay at home machine, so I dont need portability. and my eyes are going (age), I like the big screen, but cant use an external. 14" or 16"?? Hmmmm.
Yes! You can. HDMI port. Hell, get a 42” screen for it!
 

RightMACatU

macrumors 65816
Jul 12, 2012
1,420
1,112
192.168.1.1
In a pickle - I could upgrade to a base 14" from my 2020 Intel MBA as I find myself needing more video conversion horsepower, BUT, I also need my Windows 10 VM from time to time. Not keen on having two laptops.

Curious to hear about what are people doing in such a case?
Thanks.
 

solarmon

macrumors regular
Mar 12, 2015
248
285
Apple would have made it so much easier on me if they would have released a new Mini. Now I'm trying to figure out which one of the new laptops that I want. I kind of think the 16 inch is too big and I'm not sure if I really need 1TB of storage... Right now I'm leaning towards the $2500 14 inch configuration over the base model.
I always buy more memory than I think I need and never regret. In the process now of scanning allllll of my old phots, class notes, books, etc. Tired of lugging them around.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.