Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Hey, now... let's give them a bit more credit than that. They could easily be like most people, and largely unfamiliar with the specific differences between models. There are differences... but only true geeks pay much attention to those differences.
True, once they’re in a case it’s especially difficult. For me I’m mostly clocking iPhones which still have the notch instead of the island
 
  • Like
Reactions: eifelbube
Actually, this is an interesting misdiagnoses of the situation; seems to me that Magnet's lawyers may have needed to do more research before firing off that missive. First off (as reported by the author of this article) it's a vulnerability in ROM; Apple cannot develop a software mitigation for the issue. That said: Magnet's assertion that this will materially impair their business and infiltration tools is likely indirectly correct... since the targets of their activities will probably be upgrading their devices, now, if they have not already. (I expect high value targets have already done so... so no matter what, Magnet is surely overstating their losses, here.)

In any case: that may not seem like a meaningful difference to the rest of us, but Magnet's lawyers misstating the facts of the situation is exactly the kind of technicality that could cause the court to rule against them. And that's quite apart from the legitimacy -- or lack thereof -- of claiming such a vulnerability as a "trade secret."
There is an analogue in personal injury law referred to as the eggshell plaintiff, which essentially means that you take the plaintiff as they are regardless of any extenuating or mitigating circumstances. If and when they get to damages, the plaintiff will need to show the actual or likely losses but for the disclosure of the trade secret. I wonder if they would find a sympathetic jury, though. They will have to convince the jury that the discovery of the vulnerability is valuable business information and why it is valuable. Just reading the complaint gives me pause; imagine what the testimony will be like. Obviously, they will shoot for a settlement instead.
 
That said: Magnet's assertion that this will materially impair their business and infiltration tools is likely indirectly correct... since the targets of their activities will probably be upgrading their devices, now, if they have not already. (I expect high value targets have already done so... so no matter what, Magnet is surely overstating their losses, here.)

Their business isn't based on high value targets -- it's based on selling comprehensive tools for law enforcement to tap into phones of regular and low-income people (i.e. being able to list on the spec sheet that they can unlock iPhone models 1 - 12, etc).

True high-value targets probably aren't using iPhones -- or even phones at all. They have people who talk to people who may use some sort of customized/modified phone far away from the high-value person.
 
Apple should replace my iPhone 11 Pro Max with an iPhone Ultra and I’ll be content with that. 😛📱📱
 
My Apple TV 4K (2nd gen; A2169) has an A12 processor. It’s connected to Internet 24x7 with an Ethernet cable - is this bug remotely exploitable?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sergio The One
Because there was no iPhone 9 and next year (2027) will mark the twentieth anniversary of the iPhone, some people believe it will be called the iPhone 20 Pro and 20 Pro Max. Next year’s iPhone is also rumored to feature a curved display.
 
That actually surprises me. Maybe I live in a priviledged part of the world (Canada), but I don't think I see any iPhones that old anymore.

I just think it is a sad world when people feel entitled wnough to actually complain over an issue, that was not an issue when the device was launched over 6 years ago. And if yuo are still using an iPhone 11, perhaps it's time to upgrade...
My neighbor is still using an iPhone 11 and she seems to be satisfied with it. Maybe she’ll upgrade next year to an 18?
 
That actually surprises me. Maybe I live in a priviledged part of the world (Canada), but I don't think I see any iPhones that old anymore.

I just think it is a sad world when people feel entitled wnough to actually complain over an issue, that was not an issue when the device was launched over 6 years ago. And if yuo are still using an iPhone 11, perhaps it's time to upgrade...
How do you know that this defect was not an issue when the device was launched? It's possible that bad actors have been exploiting the defect for all these years without advertising it (and why would they?)
 
The iPhone 11 came out in what, 2019? That's 7 years ago. Who cares?
Wow dude. People keep working phones longer. People buy used phones. People hand down old phones to kids. People use old phones as bases for home automations. People use old phones as backups. Millions of reasons to have functioning old devices.
 
While I think the trade secret angle seems to be appropriate, the world was done a favor by releasing this information.
 
y Apple TV 4K (2nd gen; A2169) has an A12 processor. It’s connected to Internet 24x7 with an Ethernet cable - is this bug remotely exploitable?
Basically all home routers come with firewalls which block unsolicited incoming connections by default, so there is a very low chance unless you install malicious software on the ATV itself first, or if you've enabled complete port forwarding to the ATV (on the router).
 
And if you are still using an iPhone 11, perhaps it's time to upgrade...
Shareholders and the 🤣-posting individual will agree —the majority of current XS and 11 owners most likely won‘t.

Or were you suggesting to have the A12 or A13 chip replaced with an A14 or A15?
 
While I think the trade secret angle seems to be appropriate, the world was done a favor by releasing this information.
I totally agree with that because it reminded me how much I appreciate the fact that we can still have a problematic part in a car replaced without having to replace the whole car.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bzgnyc2 and I7guy
Shareholders and the 🤣-posting individual will agree —the majority of current XS and 11 owners most likely won‘t.

Or were you suggesting to have the A12 or A13 chip replaced with an A14 or A15?
I am saying that there are enough functionality differences between an old iPhone 11 and a new iPhone 17, to warrant an upgrade, not to talk about battery performance after that long.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.