If it is charging while in use, it should not damage the battery, but it will cause it to heat up much faster.
I don’t use nPlayer (anymore) but Infuse works fine for us.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Leaker: Apple to Launch New Low-Cost iPad This Year With A12 Chip
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
I don’t use nPlayer (anymore) but Infuse works fine for us.
I also use nPlayer on my A11 3GB iPhone 8 Plus, no heat issues on it.
I think the battery of my 2018 iPad was damaged, I should have fixed it.
But I used that cheap iPad for 24 months, several hours/day, so it served its purpose!
Last edited:
There are four models of iPad, five if you count the Pros as two separate models. Any human can count the number of models on a single hand, barring a disability.
So NOT 500...
Sales pay the bills of the software dev along with the hardware dev. Product segmentation is a real thing in every industry, because a company’s existence is to SELL a product. Or a service.
You got what Jobs gave you, which wasn’t always “the best”, but it was the only, you just didn’t know any better. Most were just happy to get what they got.
No one wax’s poetic about the first gen MacBook Air. It was slow and expensive and only had one USB port. Tim Cook is simply trying to broaden the iPad appeal the same way we have more than one Mac, because people like a 16” MacBook Pro over a 13” MacBook Air.
This isn’t Soviet Russia where you got one choice of car or you hoofed it. Choice drives competition, sales and innovation.
Maybe the iPad isn’t for you.
I also think it's great to have so many different options of iPhones, iPads, Macs etc to choose from.
Problem is when that variety of options is used for evil purposes, like the MacBook Pro 13.3" with old 8th gen processor and 2133MHz LPDDR3 memory that only still exists to push the price of the 10th gen model to the sky!
The 13” MacBook Pro has been $1799 and $1999 for almost 3-1/2 years now. They upped the price from the 2015, but doubled the base SSD and added the Touch Bar. They conceded to us with the nTB 1499 version
Apple has steadily worked that price back down, just as they did with the 2012-2015 13” Retina MacBook Pro which started at $1699 in Late 2012 (8/128) and settled down all the way at $1299.
They simply did the same thing here. There are no 9th Gen U-Series CPUs and Intel can barely keep up with 10th Gen CPUs using Iris Plus GPUs. What was Apple supposed to do? Reduce the $1799 version to $1299? Well, they basically did that when they introduced the 2019 13” MacBook Pro last year and gave us the Touch Bar, Iris Plus 645 GPUs and 15w 8th Gen CPUs.
All this complaining because they are 8th Gen is hilarious given there is no 9th Gen U-Series CPUs and 10nm has been and still is a dumpster fire. Is it any wonder Apple is moving to Arm-based in-house designs?
I still think the 10.5” Pro is a better deal than the Air 3. The Pro has 4GB of RAM. The A10X is still a beast. Quad speakers makes a big difference with sounds, IMO. It has a good amount of bass when playing music. Plus it offers a pretty high volume.
Just imagine the "paralysis by analysis" some folks deal with when buying a car. Some people were born at a different time. They would've loved Henry Ford's era when they could buy a Model T in any color as long as it was black.
This paradigm shift by Apple has been in the works for at least 7 years. IMO, it is a good thing.
The A11 was done on TSMC 10nm fabrication process. ( around 9/ 2017 )
That really wasn't a major targeted process. Lots of folks skipped it. 14nm (maybe refinement on 12nm) -> 7nm is the path most vendors took. I suspect it was relatively expensive for what it did and most vendors just skipped it. Apple has fat margins on the iPhone so they just took it. It also probably was a useful learning experience ( if have the deep pockets to pay for it). It also probably helped TSMC pay off the costs they sunk into it and that probably helps in getting to be one of the "first in line" on 7nm.
Apple A10X was also done on 10nm. (plain A10 on 16nm). (around 6 / 2017 ) .
Apple A10X - Wikipedia
Apple did sit on the A10X for a long time. ( got merged in with AppleTV 4K. which may have helped for volume at bit. ) That is about as close of an iPad (Pro) tie in as there was. .
As long as the iPhone 8's sold relatively well there was no reason to put it into an iPad to "soak up" excess chip production (that deviated from the estimates.) . And using the A10 long puts more money in the Scrooge McDuck money pit ( I think the competitive pressure was perceived by Apple as low from other tablets. There were getting their 'lunch' eaten by Chromebooks, but that was more a cost competition; not being outperformed by competition in "horsepower" driven sales. ).
welcome to tim cooks apple, 5000 different magical products that are very similar , too many product lines that overlap and confusing naming schemes .
The world changed from when Jobs first introduced the iPad. At the introduction Jobs compared them to "netbooks". The iPad was better than a netbook. Well netbooks got better and the dece8bedents in the guise of Chromebooks started to kick the "one model iPad " out of a substantive number of sales in several markets (including education; especially in the USA. )
Apple tried the iPhone gimmick of sell "last years iPhone cheaper" that didn't work out.
Apple moved to sell a smaller screen as "more affordable" and that largely didn't work either ( Chromebook with 11-15" screen way different than a barely 8" screen. Similarly phone-tablets phablets started to pick up ).
Apple needed an affordable ( not physically changing much ) iPad. That is the current model. It regularly goes on sale for $250 ( and Apple is probably loosing no money at all at that level. It is goosed to $329, but the intention is probably that the average price is sub $300. ( the higher "normal" list price is primarily to promote "you got a deal" notion when the $40-60 discounts kick in. ). Every 2-6 weeks the discount wave hits... not sure who is actually paying $329 who is paying attention at all.
The mini survived because there is subset of business and embedded uses that just keep it around ( cash register in small biz , portable flight maps , retail inventory tool. ). It is not for everybody and definitely not for the most cost constrained. If Apple is about the tweak the screen to smaller bezels, I suspect that model will probably go comatose again in substantive upgrades for a long while like the mini 4 did. It is smaller submarket and probably will get a smaller resource allocation over time.
The current "iPad Air" is basically where the iPad was at all along. In the > $400 range. Not competitive with affordable chrome books and mainstream laptops, bit in the zone where the iPad did fairly well. ( Android still drops the ball here after all these years. ). [ Stuff from the Pro line will probably dribble down here over time as it gets more affordable to include. ] I suspect the larger screen being rumored recently is more likely for the Air ( to stretch the gap over the "affordable" iPad.
iPad Pro is another market that didn't exist when Jobs did his presentation. Serious Windows 2-in-1 and tablets ( Surface Pro and more than a few 2-in-1s for every major PC vendor Dell/HP/Lenovo/etc. Also the $500-1000 Chromebooks (2-in-1 , tablets ) . ). Keyboard with trackpad now and a USB-C socket can plug peripherals into. A high fidelity pencil also ( which Jobs dismissed but always was particularly useful for those who do lots of drawing. (as opposed to select button or follow web link.)
Hooey. The iPad market is large enough that there are different segments of users out there.
This is largely revisionist history. iPad sales hit a wall before the diversity of the market was address. It was relatively large but stopped moving. The 'affordable' iPad has it at least growing again.
The middle iPad didn't go up at all.
"...
Many observers were surprised by Apple's entry-level price point of $499 for the iPad, with general consensus having been that pricing would come in significantly higher. ... "
Apple Open to iPad Price Cuts if Demand Lags?
The Wall Street Journal reports on a research note from Credit Suisse analyst Bill Shope based on meetings with Apple executives revealing that the...
www.macrumors.com
The current list price for an entry iPad Air ... $499 . Increased by hundreds when. Nothing increased. The name of the product in this position morphed a bit from plain "iPad" to "iPad Air" but this is still the same price point that the "holy" Jobs picked. Hasn't been moved at all.
LOL. the "affordable"/'edu' iPad is better than the first 3 generations of iPad in numerous ways and students can actually write on it to take notes. And it costs about $200 less that he price point that Jobs was charging. If want to pay the $499 price even better still.
Jobs was actually wrong here. "Netbooks" came and kicked butt. The iPad wasn't a "netbook killer". It took longer and shifting focus off of Windows ( to something more secure and utilitarian ), but the initiail wave of the iPad petered out after on the "one version for everyone" phase hit the wall.
Yes, sure. They don't want that big gap between the $329 iPad and the $799 iPad Pro. I just don't think they've found a great answer to how to fill it.
And, offering too many choices leads to paralysis and ultimately means the consumer won't buy any product at all.
It's really more the Air that I criticize, not the $329.
(Although I don't really like how the $329 has no suffix.)
The Air is faster, has a slightly larger screen and a laminated screen. I bought it because I figured it would serve me for longer and would be better for reading. It is indeed blazing fast and just great in general, especially for reading. The non-reflective laminated screen makes a big difference, in my opinion.
It fit my needs and expectations as a consumer.
I actually like Apple's iPad lineup, I feel like it's relatively well thought out in terms of product. I suspect one driving force for the 10.2 is they wanted a budget model, but they didn't want to default to small = budget like most other tablet makers. Apple seem to have realized that there is a group of consumers who buy a small tablet not because they want a cheap tablet, but because they want a small one... imagine that. Most small tablets are pieces of junk. The iPad mini is a top notch product with the A12 (it'd be even better with an A13 but I digress). I just ordered one myself, as I think it's the ideal size for gaming, couch browsing, etc. I know there may be a new one soon, but it could be a while, so I went with a refurb.
I do think Apple has a naming issue though, it is a little confusing. Maybe they should call it iPad Classic or something. Just iPad doesn't work, iPad is a range not a product. There's also some confusion, because for a long time, the MacBook Air has been the cheapest Mac laptop, but the iPad Air is not the cheapest iPad. Part of me wonders if they might be better served to get rid of the 10.2 iPad and just sell 2 generations of iPad Air -- the current generation and the last generation. So they'd have iPad Air, iPad Air 2, iPad Pro, and iPad Mini. *shrug*
I do think Apple has a naming issue though, it is a little confusing. Maybe they should call it iPad Classic or something. Just iPad doesn't work, iPad is a range not a product. There's also some confusion, because for a long time, the MacBook Air has been the cheapest Mac laptop, but the iPad Air is not the cheapest iPad. Part of me wonders if they might be better served to get rid of the 10.2 iPad and just sell 2 generations of iPad Air -- the current generation and the last generation. So they'd have iPad Air, iPad Air 2, iPad Pro, and iPad Mini. *shrug*
Why would they replace the current iPad Air with 2 older models, one of which can’t even run the latest os
I think you mean iPad Air (3rd Generation) and iPad Air (4th Generation).
Since I don't have an iPad Pro, I'm unfamiliar with the USB-C restrictions on the iPad. What is Apple limiting?
I had an iPad 2018 and upgraded to the air the next year so I’d have the laminated display w/ True Tone, bigger size, and newer chip. I was much happier because the non laminated display annoyed me too much as well. It just felt really plastic like coming from an air 2 with a laminated display. Air 3 was a much better upgrade.
LMAO. OKAY say that to Android when they released 23452343242 phones every 3 months and they all failed one, by one, by one...while Jobs released 1, i repeat 1 i phone model once a year.
I love how you say the money is needed for "software dev and hardware dev." yet they are BILLIONS in cash. LOL.
Wouldn’t it make more sense to have the A13 instead? By then the the A13 would be a year old. The older the chips the longer Apple has to support outdated technologies in the future instead of keeping the momentum of the consumer and developers chugging along to the most current-ish versions.
iPad 8th Gen goes A12
iPad Air 4th Gen goes A13
iPad mini 6th Gen goes A13
iPad Pro goes A14X in early 2021
EDIT: The A12 is up to date technologically, where as the A11 was kind of an odd duck, notice how it disappeared relatively quickly and how few models actually use it.
Last edited:
I don’t get the complaining about Apple’s product lines. Literally every tech company has multiple lines with multiple options. People have brought up Dell in this thread. Ever try shopping for a Dell computer? Do you want an XPS, G series, Inspiron, Vostro, Latitude, Alienware, or “Precision Mobile Workstation”? And those are just the laptop lines....
Apple is no longer a niche product manufacturer. They are no longer a company that caters to tech enthusiasts. They are no longer a seller of exclusive devices. They are a consumer products company: Apple products are in the hands of literally millions, if not billions, of individual consumers and businesses. Sorry you can’t satisfy the requirements of that many different users with a single device. Never have and never could. Apple is not happy to lose profits by sacrificing sales to people who can’t afford or don’t have a use case for one type of iPad. Apple is in the business of making money, like every publicly traded company, not in the business of satisfying the odd demands of enthusiasts.
Dare I say the criticism of Apple not having one type of iPad boils down to some missing the idea of Apple products being exclusive and aspirational things, not regular tools in the hands of regular people (which they are now)? Also I laugh every time I read on here “Apple should make {insert apple product here} have these specs {insert the users personal specific needs here} at {price user imagined they should pay for it} and nothing else!”, or some variation on that theme. Again, everyone has different needs and they almost certainly aren’t the same as yours. Accept it. If you don’t want a base model iPad don’t buy one.
Apple is no longer a niche product manufacturer. They are no longer a company that caters to tech enthusiasts. They are no longer a seller of exclusive devices. They are a consumer products company: Apple products are in the hands of literally millions, if not billions, of individual consumers and businesses. Sorry you can’t satisfy the requirements of that many different users with a single device. Never have and never could. Apple is not happy to lose profits by sacrificing sales to people who can’t afford or don’t have a use case for one type of iPad. Apple is in the business of making money, like every publicly traded company, not in the business of satisfying the odd demands of enthusiasts.
Dare I say the criticism of Apple not having one type of iPad boils down to some missing the idea of Apple products being exclusive and aspirational things, not regular tools in the hands of regular people (which they are now)? Also I laugh every time I read on here “Apple should make {insert apple product here} have these specs {insert the users personal specific needs here} at {price user imagined they should pay for it} and nothing else!”, or some variation on that theme. Again, everyone has different needs and they almost certainly aren’t the same as yours. Accept it. If you don’t want a base model iPad don’t buy one.