let us know i am curious...
still have over 12 hours their original statement was accurate.
let us know i am curious...
let us know i am curious...
but i did find this link which may be the spoiler: http://forums.macnn.com/66/macbook-and-ibook/352111/macbook-w-4gb-ram-w-leopard/
let us know i am curious...
but i did find this link which may be the spoiler: http://forums.macnn.com/66/macbook-and-ibook/352111/macbook-w-4gb-ram-w-leopard/
i guess (unless my math is bad and may be), if the iMac knows it is there then why does it not use it? if you add up all the columns on the left- top to bottom- it equals 4GB. color me stupid right now. i'm getting married in ONE week and my mind is mush from all the prep. but why is it not addressed?
both examples- consultants above and the link i posted, each have different processes running and if you look at each Macs processes each one is different in the amount that is being used/ not used/ wired/ inactive etc. but, when you add the columns up in each screen shot they both equal almost 4GB of RAM.
I've used a command to max out ram usage. That's why ram free is so little. If you add the left column: wired 0.3 gb + active 1.8 gb + inactive 0.9 gb, it adds up to the "Used: 2.99 GB"
So I guess the answer is pre-Santa Rosa motherboards cannot handle more than 3 GB of RAM, no 64bit OS can solve it.