Leopard on ADC Select on Wednesday

Discussion in 'Mac Programming' started by rpp3po, Oct 23, 2007.

  1. rpp3po macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2003
    Location:
    Germany
  2. jstad macrumors regular

    jstad

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2007
    #2
    is this really a topic? Is this confirmed or just a rumor?! Now you got me all excited.
     
  3. MongoTheGeek macrumors 68040

    MongoTheGeek

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2003
    Location:
    Its not so much where you are as when you are.
    #3
    When on Wednesday?
    Wednesday at where?
     
  4. Alloye macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2007
    Location:
    Rocklin, CA
  5. kainjow Moderator emeritus

    kainjow

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2000
  6. Alloye macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2007
    Location:
    Rocklin, CA
    #6
    Didn't happen.

    What really sucks is that while ADC is being denied legitimate access to the final build, the pirates are already enjoying it. :mad:
     
  7. kainjow Moderator emeritus

    kainjow

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2000
    #7
    You still have over two hours. Apple is PST :)
     
  8. jstad macrumors regular

    jstad

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2007
    #8
    I have a feeling it will not be released on ADC until just before the official launch @ 6pm. Kind of sucks since you guys are still under NDA so there is really no point in delaying the release build to those members. :rolleyes:
     
  9. Markleshark macrumors 603

    Markleshark

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2006
    Location:
    Carlisle, Up Norf!
    #9
    And this sucks more than us who have bought it as well?
     
  10. MacDonaldsd macrumors 65816

    MacDonaldsd

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Location:
    London , UK
    #10
    I don't think it will be available until Friday at 6 on the dot.
     
  11. janey macrumors 603

    janey

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2002
    Location:
    sunny los angeles
    #11
    What I think sucks most is http://daringfireball.net/linked/2007/october#thu-25-pogue

    Forget the pirates. Apple telling devs to wait until the official release while giving it out like candy to certain journalists. Fantastic.
     
  12. Alloye macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2007
    Location:
    Rocklin, CA
    #12
    Yes it does. ADC Select/Premier members pay for early access. One of the reasons for doing so is to enable advance testing of applications on OS updates prior to release. Yet as of this morning, only the pirates, a select group of journalists, and a few customers who received their pre-orders early have Leopard. Developers don't. I think it's a disgrace considering how much we helped Apple refine and debug this cat.
     
  13. twoodcc macrumors P6

    twoodcc

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2005
    Location:
    Right side of wrong
    #13
    so i guess you didn't get it yesterday? or today? hopefully tomorrow i guess
     
  14. Krevnik macrumors 68040

    Krevnik

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2003
    #14
    Depends, Select members are paying 500$/year for access, which includes GM builds. In some ways it is kinda frustrating not to know what bugs may have been fixed going into the GM from 559 until our customers have the GM in their hands and have installed it before us. :/
     
  15. Mebsat macrumors regular

    Joined:
    May 19, 2003
    Location:
    Florida
    #15
    ADC Select question

    I am planning to join ADC Select. The website lists access to the current copy of OSX Server, via download. I presume this will be updated at latest by next week and the Leopard Beta will be replaced by a final build CD.

    Can any current ADC members fill me in on the restrictions placed on Server by the ADC program? Is it limited to 10 users? How is "for testing purposes" defined?

    Thanks
     
  16. milo macrumors 604

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2003
    #16
    The situation is way overblown. ADC folks had the previous build, which was virtually identical, anything tested on that should work fine.

    This time around, it leaked way later than it ever did in the past. So it looks like apple made the right call, if they had released it earlier to ADC, an ADC person would have just got it to the pirates sooner.
     
  17. caveman_uk Guest

    caveman_uk

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2003
    Location:
    Hitchin, Herts, UK
    #17
    And you know that how exactly?
     
  18. Krevnik macrumors 68040

    Krevnik

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2003
    #18
    "For Testing Purposes" means: If we find out you are using your seed keys to host corporate/public servers instead of licensing them correctly... you get to meet Apple's legal team, in person if you are really lucky.
     
  19. Mebsat macrumors regular

    Joined:
    May 19, 2003
    Location:
    Florida
    #19
    Ha!

    Well, that seems fair enough. I was just wondering if there were any limitations compared to the shipping product, for testing purposes, like stress-testing a web app, etc.

    I'm still wading through the ADC site, sometimes things aren't that clear.
     
  20. w0ngbr4d macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2006
    Location:
    Findlay, OH
    #20
    Where I work, while we don't create operating systems, the differences between a release candidate and our "GM" is only bug fixes. I would be amazed if they changed something in the underlying frameworks from a functionality perspective that would break an app that late in the development cycle.

    I remember reading that the last developer seed only had 2 known issues. I don't remember if those were underlying issues or issues with different applications. I just don't see how that would cause any issues to developers who have access to the last seed.
     
  21. rpp3po thread starter macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2003
    Location:
    Germany
    #21
    I apologize.

    A collegue got this info informally from an Apple developer support technican, who speculated that they may give up their strict policy, if the GM would appear on P2P networks. Seems that that was wrong...
     
  22. Catfish_Man macrumors 68030

    Catfish_Man

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2001
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    #22
    Two known issues they bothered to list. Hundreds and hundreds of actual known issues. Heck, the WebKit list alone has over 80 priority 1 bugs left.

    In Adium's case I know of one bug that hit us on 559 that was fixed at some point between then and 581.
     
  23. Alloye macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2007
    Location:
    Rocklin, CA
    #23
    Sorry. I've been in this business far too long to accept that statement as absolute. And besides, how do you know 9A559 and 9A581 are virtually identical? There were a full 22 builds and more than three weeks of time between them.

    C'mon! You can't know that someone from ADC would have leaked the build any sooner than it did. It is just as likely that some disgruntled engineer at 1 Infinite Loop uploaded the thing the day it was announced.

    In any case, it doesn't matter. The fact that Leopard has been available via torrents for the past few days yet still hasn't been posted to the ADC download site is an insult to each and every one of us who paid good money to participate in the Leopard product cycle.
     
  24. Fukui macrumors 68000

    Fukui

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2002
    #24
    I agree. And to the other poster who said the latest dev build is virtually identical...... do you work at apple or something???

    Because, bugs in the frameworks are exactly what prevents us from doing anything new with the os, or even getting older apps running. Since devs can't test, they can't do anything really. Thats one reason why vista's driver support was so bad!!
     
  25. Alloye macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2007
    Location:
    Rocklin, CA
    #25
    Finally!

    The retail build of Leopard is now available on the ADC download site.
     

Share This Page