Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

scan

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Oct 24, 2005
344
0
Does anyone have Leopard running on the old PB machines? If so, can you tell me about your experiences on Leopard and how much memory do you have?
 
I run Leopard on a 12" G4 1Ghz Powerbook with 768mb of ram.
Its, err, not fast by any means :D But its perfectly good for web use. Safari, Mail, iChat, that kind of thing.
Still, not too shabby for a Mac thats getting on for 6 years old yet runs Apples latest/current OS.
 
Alright. Thanks. I guess I'll just keep Tiger on it.
 
I've run it on a 1.5Ghz 12" PBG4 with the max 1.25GB of RAM and it was perfectly acceptable. Depending on your tastes, I recommend at least 1GHZ and 1GB of RAM to run Leopard (from it's 866MHZ, 512MB requirements).

If you don't have a need for Leopard, then there is no reason to upgrade as Tiger will run better, and is still a great OS.
 
Not recommended

I've been running Leopard for about a month on my 1.67GHz G4 PB w/ 1.5G ram, and I'm not too happy with how slow it is. I would stick to Tiger if I were you...

I wish I new how to go back to 10.4.11 - that was the smoothest OS on my PB
 
I ran it on a 1.5 Ghz PowerBook G4, 768mb ram, it was pretty good the interface was bit slower than Panther though. Keep in mind that was an early version of Leopard just after release, the later ones may have improved.
 
I had it running on my PBG4 with 1.3GHz processor and 2GB of RAM. I didn't see where it was running any slower than Tiger, be it UI responsiveness or general computing. In fact I would still be using it with no complaints except I needed more horsepower to do photo editing.

I'd say put it on, I really found no difference between the two.

Ruahrc
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.