Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Are there not decent enough audio recording devices that are USB compatible? I know of and have used FW audio recording equipment and it does work well, but I've used USB audio recording equipment as well that has produced some great results.

There is, but the one I'm referring to specifically is the Presonus Studiolive. That still only has the Firewire option. The problem with USB is that it doesn't have quite enough through put for higher track numbers. I believe that the audio manufacturing world is moving to Thunderbolt, but they just haven't gotten there yet. Until then, I'm stuck with Firewire.

Interestingly enough though, the theme of this years NAMM festival was the iPad. Almost all current devices are able to connect to it to be used as a controller. Which is farking awesome!
 
My upgrade wants:
CPU Must be faster. I want something in a 2012 MacBook Air that has as much processing horsepower as what's in the 2011 17" MacBook Pro. If that can't be done in 2012, I'll wait and see what a 2013 MacBook Air offers.

Battery Please hit the 8 hour mark for wireless web, versus the current 7 hour. 10 hour mark preferred.

Screen Retina is an absolute must-have for me. I'd prefer 3456x2160 (retina version of 1728x1080). I'd settle for 2560x1600 (retina version of 1280x800; technically a real estate downgrade from current MacBook Air 13", but same real estate as current MacBook Pro 13").

And I honestly don't care what this laptop model is called. These are my wants for a 13" laptop with the slim design of current Airs. If the new MacBook Pro 13" is slim and has the specs (plus the other specs current Airs have), great!
 
There is, but the one I'm referring to specifically is the Presonus Studiolive. That still only has the Firewire option. The problem with USB is that it doesn't have quite enough through put for higher track numbers. I believe that the audio manufacturing world is moving to Thunderbolt, but they just haven't gotten there yet. Until then, I'm stuck with Firewire.

I've not heard of that product before. Hoping this product will eventually move to a Thunderbolt device.
 
Are there not decent enough audio recording devices that are USB compatible? I know of and have used FW audio recording equipment and it does work well, but I've used USB audio recording equipment as well that has produced some great results.

The problem with USB audio interfaces was the "Rice Crispy Triplets" (snap/crackle/pop) that would sometimes find their way into your recordings, usually at the worst possible time.

Like all audio interfaces, USB interfaces rely on the CPU to do the analog-to-digital (A/D) conversion. But, unlike FireWire interfaces which have their own miniprocessor chips to manage dataflow across the FireWire bus, USB relies on the main CPU to move data across the USB bus. And, of course, other processes also tax the CPU. When the processor gets overloaded, some of the encoding gets backed up and you get the crappy noise over parts -- or all -- of your recording. That's true of any audio interface, but it was the USB interfaces that tended to have those problems IRL.

But then a funny thing happened in the processor world. Instead of just making faster processors, Intel/AMD/etc. began to develop CPUs made up of multiple processor cores. And the older USB interfaces that used to back up when they were running A/D conversion work on the CPU that competed against the USB bus itself (and that SETI background process you were running) could now be spawned onto separate processor cores, and the cheap USB interfaces that were inherently noisy now sounded OK.

Now, are the FireWire audio interfaces still better? In many cases, yes, in part because they aren't being built to be the low cost hardware. The higher-end preamps, in particular, can make a world of difference. Not to mention better software control of the interface internals. And FireWire interfaces still handle the data transfers across the FW bus far more efficiently than even USB3 (which still relies on the CPU for that work) ever will.

So what about USB3 audio interfaces? Well, there aren't any. At least not yet. And, once you have the buffering problems resolved and the A/D converter process has enough room to breathe, many of the old interfaces will work fine. Again, the difference is more in the quality of the preamps, software control of parameters, etc. I do think that, once USB3 is ubiquitous, we'll start to see USB3 audio interfaces, but nobody is going to spend the money on designing these until they will work on basically all hardware. And, of course, the high-end audio interfaces will continue to be FireWire, or possibly even Thunderbird...

Edit: Sorry to completely threadjack the 2012 MBA Wish List thread.
 
Last edited:
Did you see the iPad 3 keynote?
To be considered retina, it doesnt need to be 300+ ppi.

Believe me, there will be no 2x resolutions in any mac/macbooks... maybe a bump (like 1440x900 -> 1680x1050) but i'm sure it wont double the resolution

a) there is actual proof it will be 2x (hiDPI mode in Lion)
b) it still wouldn't be 300dpi (you said it yourself)
c) simply bumping the resolution from 900p to something like 1050p would increase definition but also make things a lot smaller, and would be uncomfortable to most.
d) I agree that iMacs probably will not see a "retina" upgrade any time soon, since they can already be considered "retina" displays.. I can't certainly see pixels on a 27" iMac, but I can see them on my 13" Pro with normal distance, sure as hell.
 
What I wish from next 11" Macbook Air Ultimate ;
-Ivy Bridge CPU with HD 4000 GPU (some nice OpenCL capabilities, finally!)
-1600x900 resolution ( please Apple, I know you can do it )
-4 GB DDR3L 1600Mhz ( 1.35V instead of 1.5V )
-256GB Flash Storage ( SATA3 )
-USB 3.0 (+Thunderbolt)
-SD-XC card slot
-Bluetooth 4.0 & Wi-Fi 802.11n
-Better Stereo Speakers
-7 hours of battery life

And I'm sold :)
 
a) there is actual proof it will be 2x (hiDPI mode in Lion)
b) it still wouldn't be 300dpi (you said it yourself)
c) simply bumping the resolution from 900p to something like 1050p would increase definition but also make things a lot smaller, and would be uncomfortable to most.

During the "new iPad" announcement, Apple used 10" typical viewing distance for iPhone and 15" typical viewing distance for iPad. I suspect Apple will use 20" typical viewing distance for MacBook Air with retina display.

Based on that, Apple won't double current MBA resolutions, which would bump 13" MBA's pixel density from 128 to 255 PPI and 11" MBA from 135 to 269 PPI (even higher than new iPad's 264 PPI).

I expect more modest ~1.5x boost for about 200 PPI:
  • 11" MBA: 1920x1080 for 190 PPI
  • 13" MBA: 2160x1350 for 192 PPI
  • Rumored 15" MBA: 2560x1440 for 191 PPI

200 PPI at HiDPI mode would mean elements and text will look larger than current MBA models, but I think it would be a good compromise of quality vs. usabiltiy.
 
Higher resolution screens (Retina isn't required, but just plain higher resolutions), better battery life, and better GPU performance would be a win for Apple.
 
I doubt it will happen this year, but I would like MBA to have a touchscreen. OS X Lion is obviously set up for it. Apple says it's not all that convenient when working on a desktop, but I work a lot in my lap or low table where it is more convenient to hit the screen than navigate the cursor.

It would be even more convenient if the keyboard was connected through Bluetooth.
How would a touchscreen Mac work with a Mac Mini or Mac Pro?
 
My wishlist...higher resolution! Just the thought of a super good screen on the air makes me really want it!

Im saving my pennies to get the Air around Xmas...! :D
 
MacAir 2012 Wishlist

Touchscreen replacing keyboard.

Traditional MacBook Air laptop clamshell form, but with a virtual interface. Virtual keyboard, trackpad et al.
 
-11" 13" 15" 17"
-thinner,lite,edge to edge gorilla glass (higher resolutions)
-longer battery time (same or less recharge time)
-usb 3/thunderbolt
-ssd card slot
-backlit keyboard (optional color adjust)
-replaceable/upgradeable ram slot/ssd drive (easy bottom panel access)
-usb/thunderbolt osx restore stick or full restore partition
-osx mountain lion
 
-11" 13" 15" 17"
-thinner,lite,edge to edge gorilla glass (higher resolutions)


If their going to do edge to edge they might take a few notes from the new HP laptop and stick a 14" screen in a 13.3" body. Same goes for the rest.
 
Are there any media events scheduled for April where they might announced new Airs? Or do you think they'd just do a website launch?
 
Are there any media events scheduled for April where they might announced new Airs? Or do you think they'd just do a website launch?

Well it depends if its a big update, or just specs.
They will probably have an event at the end of the year around ML and release a bigger upgrade then.

I'm just assuming that this next update will be smaller, but the next will be bigger since ML is coming at the end of the year.
 
I want an air (don't need one badly so I can happily wait). How hot and loud do they run? How much of an improvement would Ivy bridge (for heat) be?

Thanks
 
I want an air (don't need one badly so I can happily wait). How hot and loud do they run? How much of an improvement would Ivy bridge (for heat) be?

Thanks

I only had the 2010 13'' Air, and I haven't heard it once. I think my Pro actually runs a little hotter and louder (not bad but I can hear it sometimes), so heat and noise definitely are no problem on the Air, at least in my experience.
 
In order of priority :

- GPU
- Battery
- CPU
- SSD size
- HD Facetime
- Screen Resolution
- RAM
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.