Guess am the minority here, but would recommend you to keep the Samsung (right), if you get the right calibration the yellowish will get solved and you can avoid potential future IR issues associated to LG technology on their rMBP screens.
I have had both LG and Samsung.
1. LG represents perfect white and it is about 20% brighter but has IR. Overall it is a better display.
2. Samsung is YELLOWISH by default, but you can fix it setting it to color temperatures over 7500ºk but it makes it dramatically dimmer. I think that all samsung color profiles are wrong. 6500ºk white point is at 7700ºk more or less. It seems to be an OSX bug.
-----------------
I can't live with the image retention because it got worse over the time in my case so LG wasn't an option.
I can't live with a yellowish screen because it is horribly yellow, and distorts real colors in photoshop, etc. If you fix it calibrating it, it gets unacceptably dimmer. So Samsung is not an option.
-----------------
----> I decided to sell it and quickly realized that i was going to lose a lot of money.
----> I bought an external display to work making me feel stupid for having a rMBP.
Conclusion: Don't buy retina macbook pros for the moment.
Guess am the minority here, but would recommend you to keep the Samsung (right), if you get the right calibration the yellowish will get solved and you can avoid potential future IR issues associated to LG technology on their rMBP screens.
Thats funny, there are more reports here of Samsung screens with IR than LG SA2 screens.... I guess old wive's tales die hard.![]()
There seems to be a lot of variation in the Samsung panels. Mine was measured to have a white point of ~6700K with the default profile, and with hardware calibration it achieved pretty much the full sRGB gamut with D65 white point and 120cd/m^2 luminance. It was already amazingly close to that before the calibration, if the luminance was set manually to around 120cd/m^2. X-rite i1 Display Pro was used for measurement and calibration.
It's just impossible to say anything conclusive of the OPs displays, as there is no reference with a known white point in the picture..
can you tell me how you achieved your results
Really? Can you provide links for complaints on Samsung screens?
Thats funny, there are more reports here of Samsung screens with IR than LG SA2 screens.... I guess old wive's tales die hard.If you want to avoid IR, it seems to be best to go with the LG Sa2 model.
But just pick the laptop you feel better about.
There seems to be a lot of variation in the Samsung panels. Mine was measured to have a white point of ~6700K with the default profile, and with hardware calibration it achieved pretty much the full sRGB gamut with D65 white point and 120cd/m^2 luminance. It was already amazingly close to that before the calibration, if the luminance was set manually to around 120cd/m^2. X-rite i1 Display Pro was used for measurement and calibration.
It's just impossible to say anything conclusive of the OPs displays, as there is no reference with a known white point in the picture..
I've had image retention on my desktop LCD monitors and the TV way before I bought the MBPR. That the LG displays have IR is not a negative.
I have used all three: Samsung, LG SJA1 and SJA2. Here are my findings:
The LG screens have a bit deeper black and higher color saturation, but are not as bright overall. They are around 10 cd/m2 dimmer.
The Samsung is noticeably sharper.
Viewing angle differences are negligible. All three panels had very good backlight uniformity and no bleed.
Once calibrated to D65/120 cd/m2 with an actual colorimeter, not the built in "calibration" tool in display preferences, the three displays are all very close in white point and color reproduction.
With all of that taken into account, I would want a Samsung display for its superior sharpness and absence of IR problems. The LG SJA1 is far too prone to IR, and we don't have enough solid data or time since their release to confidently say the SJA2 doesn't have IR.
Excellent data, thanks. Do you mind sharing your Samsung calibrated values? I'm using a custom profile someone posted here a while ago and looks pretty good ( less yellowish than the factory setting ) but would like to compare it to yours.
I'm guessing I'm very much in the minority in this thread but I have a 15" rMBP from 2012. I don't notice any image retention. Thankfully. And I'm not going to look for it.
There's no way I am going to even try to find out who manufactured my panel. It's information that would just make me obsess so I just don't even want to know.
I'm guessing I'm very much in the minority in this thread but I have a 15" rMBP from 2012. I don't notice any image retention. Thankfully. And I'm not going to look for it.
There's no way I am going to even try to find out who manufactured my panel. It's information that would just make me obsess so I just don't even want to know.
I don't blame you, but how much longer do you have a warranty on your rMBP? If you have Apple Care would not worry, but if your 1 year is about to expire would be wise to check since if you have the LG and get the IR eventually out of warranty, that will not be covered by Apple and will be an expensive repair (Just my 2 cents)
I don't blame you, but how much longer do you have a warranty on your rMBP? If you have Apple Care would not worry, but if your 1 year is about to expire would be wise to check since if you have the LG and get the IR eventually out of warranty, that will not be covered by Apple and will be an expensive repair (Just my 2 cents)
Thanks for the advice. Actually I purchased this rMBP in June 2012 and it's the first Mac I've ever bought AppleCare for. I figured since there was almost nothing that I could upgrade, that it was essentially a solid state computer, that AppleCare was necessary. That and it being a first generation computerLuckily I've had no image retention issues - and I've looked. It's the best MacBook I've ever owned.