For half the price, LG makes a similar 4k monitor (without Thunderbolt and with slightly less brightness):
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1224162-REG/lg_27ud68_p_27_widescreen_led.html
That one is 27 inch versus 31.5 on this one.
For half the price, LG makes a similar 4k monitor (without Thunderbolt and with slightly less brightness):
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1224162-REG/lg_27ud68_p_27_widescreen_led.html
This does look leaps and bounds better than that other abomination. I'd buy one if my MacBook Pro supported 60Hz 4K.
No it isn't. Please stop confusing people. And the idiocy that can't figure out that "3840" rounds-up to the round number 4000, while "4096" just happens to have a 4 in the front.Also, as mentioned 4K is 4096, UHD is 3840.
Now THAT is a good looking display. Makes you wonder why the Apple / LG 5K display didn't use a similar design. LG has been shipping displays with this design for a while now.
No it isn't. Please stop confusing people. And the idiocy that can't figure out that "3840" rounds-up to the round number 4000, while "4096" just happens to have a 4 in the front.
The official naming scheme selected by the Consumer Electronics Association is as follows:
"4K UHD" = 3840×2160 = 1.78:1 (16:9)
"8K UHD" = 7680×4320 = 1.78:1 (16:9)
"DCI 4K" or "Widescreen 4K" = 4096×2160 = 1.90:1 (17:9)
"DCI 8K" or "Widescreen 8K" =8192×4320 = 1.90:1 (17:9)
Thanks.
I think there is some confusion here. The new 2017 Mac Pro, which is basically the 2013 Mac Pro, does NOT have Thunderbolt 3. It has 6 Thunderbolt 2 ports. I am unsure if this display will work on the current Mac Pro, probably not.
Anyone, please correct me if I am wrong about this.
If carlsson was referring to the rumored Mac Pro that might be out in two years, then yes, I would hope it would have Thunderbolt 3.
It is ridiculous that the 2017 "New" Mac Pro doesn't have TB3.