Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Because it is dated and upgraded rarely basically along with the argument of one cable to rule them all (which in my opinion USB-C is far more complex and annoying until manufacturers labeling them is mandatory). Also in the current state the Apple lineup is confusing... you have some devices that use USB-C and some that use Lightning and yes I know they make USB-C to Lightning cables, but the speed and power capabilities are severely cut going to lightning. Look I also do and don't want to make the change...do you know how many USB-A to lightning and C to lightning that I have? I guess these cables will still be good for like my trackpad I have and whatnot, but people are now recording 4k ProRes on iPhones...and while Airdrop is amazing and very fast for what it is, with transferring 4k footage or whatever large files you are needing to move just takes forever especially if you have to do it many times.

Your use case you may be fine as you stated, but others will welcome the change and also think about the opportunity for maybe some more android users to switch, think about how annoying it would be to want to switch to iPhone to know that you need new cables and xyz which just adds to the total cost and even just that one annoyance can be the thing that changes your mind.
 
What’s wrong with the lighting port and why is apple and everyone else so anxious to get rid of it? My iPhone 13, Apple TV remote, AirPods, Magic Mouse, all use lightning and I am not upgrading the moment they all feature USB-C ports.
Nothing wrong with Lightning in particular, and I don't think Apple's too happy about being forced to get rid of it.

Lightning is slower than modern USB-C, and Apple may have been playing it out to keep their proprietary Lightning connectors while also working toward good enough wireless connections & adoption to go portless. Unfortunately, bureaucrats decided to stifle future innovation for wired connectivity by mandating a 2014 connector technology, so if Apple wants to continue selling products where devices without USB-C are banned, they're forced to use USB-C for an interim period. At least until wireless capabilities become more viable for diagnostics and file transfers, and assuming bureaucrats don't attempt to squelch new technologies there as well.
 
What’s wrong with the lighting port and why is apple and everyone else so anxious to get rid of it? My iPhone 13, Apple TV remote, AirPods, Magic Mouse, all use lightning and I am not upgrading the moment they all feature USB-C ports.
Nothing wrong with it. Your issue is with the European Union, who is forcing Apple to switch to USB-C for iPhones/iDevices.
 
Because it is dated and upgraded rarely basically along with the argument of one cable to rule them all (which in my opinion USB-C is far more complex and annoying until manufacturers labeling them is mandatory). Also in the current state the Apple lineup is confusing... you have some devices that use USB-C and some that use Lightning and yes I know they make USB-C to Lightning cables, but the speed and power capabilities are severely cut going to lightning. Look I also do and don't want to make the change...do you know how many USB-A to lightning and C to lightning that I have? I guess these cables will still be good for like my trackpad I have and whatnot, but people are now recording 4k ProRes on iPhones...and while Airdrop is amazing and very fast for what it is, with transferring 4k footage or whatever large files you are needing to move just takes forever especially if you have to do it many times.

Your use case you may be fine as you stated, but others will welcome the change and also think about the opportunity for maybe some more android users to switch, think about how annoying it would be to want to switch to iPhone to know that you need new cables and xyz which just adds to the total cost and even just that one annoyance can be the thing that changes your mind.
Well one advantage. My iPhone and iPad will once again use the s,w charger rather than 2 separate ones.
 
When people say slower, do they mean for charging? Surely the vast, vast majority of people don’t use a cable for transferring data. We have this thing called the cloud, and apples version of it has been around even longer than lightning!
 
Unfortunately, bureaucrats decided to stifle future innovation for wired connectivity by mandating a 2014 connector technology, so if Apple wants to continue selling products where devices without USB-C are banned, they're forced to use USB-C for an interim period.
I don't know the legislation. Does it specifically mandate USB-C or is more like a standardized connector and that just happens to be USB-C at the moment (could conceivably be something else if a standards group agrees)?
 
  • Like
Reactions: War833
Speaking from a personal point of view, other than all my devices (including iPad and MacBook) being on USB-C and only having an iPhone and AirPods being on lightning - not too big of an issue; there is also the tech spec.

Lightning has not been updated in years, whereas USB-C technology keeps improving.
This was a quick lookup, I have not had time to fact-check it, but even if not precise, you can see the tech differences between the two.

Screenshot 2023-08-03 at 12.19.58 PM.png
 
Speaking from a personal point of view, other than all my devices (including iPad and MacBook) being on USB-C and only having an iPhone and AirPods being on lightning - not too big of an issue; there is also the tech spec.

Lightning has not been updated in years, whereas USB-C technology keeps improving.
This was a quick lookup, I have not had time to fact-check it, but even if not precise, you can see the tech differences between the two.

View attachment 2241163
The only minor point I'd add to this is that Lightning on some iPad Pros supports USB 3.0, so they can do up to 5Gbps in some scenarios, with an adapter.


But your overall point about the technical benefits of USB-C over lightning still stand.
 
Not my model. AppleTV 4K 2nd Gen.
But you already stated that you didn't plan on upgrading regardless, plus even if you did upgrade your iPhone you could still use the lightning for the Apple TV remote. Ultimately your question about the uproar (if you will) about the switch to USB-C has certainly been answered and it boils down to capability and availability to majority of people.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lyrics23
I’ll be quite happy to see iPhone move to USB-C. I can then use same leads for iPhone and iPad.
Mind you, I went be able to update airpods and other accessories immediately so will need lightning cable for a bit.
 
What’s wrong with the lighting port and why is apple and everyone else so anxious to get rid of it? My iPhone 13, Apple TV remote, AirPods, Magic Mouse, all use lightning and I am not upgrading the moment they all feature USB-C ports.
It's gonna be a slow changeover for me as well. I have multiple accessories (AirPods Max and Pro, keyboards, trackpad, Apple TV remote...) that all charge via Lightning and I'm certainly not going to throw them out because a different connector came out. I transfer zero data through Lightning so any speed advantage is irrelevant to me.

Hell, I've still got stuff kicking around that uses Micro USB (truly, the cockroach of connectors) -- but again I'm not throwing out a well-functioning qi charger or bluetooth speaker or e-reader just because it uses a lame charge port.

I understand the need to move toward better connector standards, but in the real world we end up living with "all of the above" for quite a while. That's why I laugh when people are like "I'm only upgrading my AirPods if they have USB-C" as if they're overnight going to reach this holy grail of one cord to rule them all.
 
Last edited:
Would be interesting to know the percentage of consumers that do so though. I’m guessing it would be a fraction of a percent
I think that number will slowly rise or something in the near future. The videos and photos are getting larger and Apple is maintaining the 2TB iCloud limit not to mention the cost of that let alone if/when they do give more options. I know most people are not shooting ProRaw and those that are probably offload the footage if it is still needed or delete if not, but all the 4k little videos that people record will eventually hit the limit storage wise and most people don't want the high monthly iCloud or the higher cost iPhone just for basically storage
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrMojo1
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.