Devil May Cry 5 runs at 4K 60fps on the One X by the way.
And I think you're mistaken about a lot of other things. I'd suggest that you start watching more Digital Foundry analysis of the last generation of game consoles to get a better idea.
www.eurogamer.net
TL;DR: the One S has "4K upscaling" but it's not what you think. Basically, this is the same kind of "upscaling" you'll find in any 4K TV anyways, and the TV typically will do a better job. This "upscaling" simply ensures that if your game is 1080p, then each pixel will appear exactly like a pixel... crisp and clear, even on a 4K screen. It doesn't mean your game is running at a higher resolution, nor does it mean the GPU is more powerful than what it is. Think zooming into pixel art, and instead of blurring out, that pixel art remains crisp and clear.
Also, the One S is NOT more powerful than a PS4. A base PS4 still has a much better GPU. Many PS4 games are at least 1080p. Many Xbox One games on the One S barely keeps up at 900p. Microsoft made the wrong decision earlier on and they paid for it throughout the entire generation.
So aside from the (slightly) beefier CPU, the One S is still the slowest console of the generation in terms of graphics performance. It's hardly indicative of what you can achieve with the Pro-level consoles or the PS4 and Switch.
And having Apple Silicon beat Intel's integrated graphics is honestly... not all that impressive. Intel's integrated graphics are at the bottom of the industry. It's not so hard to be "better" than the bottom. Even with XE, Tiger Lake is just slightly above the bottom line, but still far from something that will be able to replace a dedicated GPU like in the 16" MacBook.
The key point I'd like to point out is: Apple seems to be considering Navi 3, and whether that means there'll be Intel Macs still, or if Apple Silicon will go together with AMD graphics, it shows that... Apple isn't so confident they can rely solely on their own silicon for everything.
And that, to me, is more tell-tale than some internet stranger telling me Apple Silicon will be awesome. I'll believe it when I see it.
And I think you're mistaken about a lot of other things. I'd suggest that you start watching more Digital Foundry analysis of the last generation of game consoles to get a better idea.
Microsoft Xbox One S review
In many ways, the new Xbox One S is the physical embodiment of Microsoft's efforts in reconnecting with the core gamer.…
www.eurogamer.net
TL;DR: the One S has "4K upscaling" but it's not what you think. Basically, this is the same kind of "upscaling" you'll find in any 4K TV anyways, and the TV typically will do a better job. This "upscaling" simply ensures that if your game is 1080p, then each pixel will appear exactly like a pixel... crisp and clear, even on a 4K screen. It doesn't mean your game is running at a higher resolution, nor does it mean the GPU is more powerful than what it is. Think zooming into pixel art, and instead of blurring out, that pixel art remains crisp and clear.
Also, the One S is NOT more powerful than a PS4. A base PS4 still has a much better GPU. Many PS4 games are at least 1080p. Many Xbox One games on the One S barely keeps up at 900p. Microsoft made the wrong decision earlier on and they paid for it throughout the entire generation.
So aside from the (slightly) beefier CPU, the One S is still the slowest console of the generation in terms of graphics performance. It's hardly indicative of what you can achieve with the Pro-level consoles or the PS4 and Switch.
And having Apple Silicon beat Intel's integrated graphics is honestly... not all that impressive. Intel's integrated graphics are at the bottom of the industry. It's not so hard to be "better" than the bottom. Even with XE, Tiger Lake is just slightly above the bottom line, but still far from something that will be able to replace a dedicated GPU like in the 16" MacBook.
The key point I'd like to point out is: Apple seems to be considering Navi 3, and whether that means there'll be Intel Macs still, or if Apple Silicon will go together with AMD graphics, it shows that... Apple isn't so confident they can rely solely on their own silicon for everything.
And that, to me, is more tell-tale than some internet stranger telling me Apple Silicon will be awesome. I'll believe it when I see it.