Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Whatever the look and feel - you'd need to replicate the features of Finder (or Windows 7 or earlier Explorer) to really stand out IMO. What good is a desktop with an incomplete file manager?

I don't even remember the amount of tweaks to Nemo (or is it Nautilus? - not the default filemanager at any rate because the one that shipped with the distro was too basic) I had to apply on Pop_OS to get it somewhat close. Still looking for a Quicklook-alternative on any OS that is as reliable (and open to file-format plugins) as the one that comes with a Mac by default.
 
I had to apply on Pop_OS to get it somewhat close. Still looking for a Quicklook-alternative
I'm running Gnome 50 and I have quicklook. I highlight a file, and in many cases it works. I've not used this exhaustively so I can't say how close it gets but it seems to work ell enough for me. I know it doesn't do xlsx files, that's so far the only thing that doesn't work

I don't even remember the amount of tweaks to Nemo (or is it Nautilus? - not the default filemanager at any rate because the one that shipped with the distro was too basic) I had to apply on Pop_OS
Can you expound on what/why you needed to add so many tweaks? I'm not looking at specifics, but rather what you found lacking in the Pop_OS' file manager.

When did you last look/use it? For PopOS, Cosmic went through a major update last year, instead of being bolted on top of Gnome, they system 76 built it as a complete standalone DE. It had some teething problems in the beginning of the year but it seems overall pretty decent. I'm not on the distro, nor do I feel like installing that DE onto my distro, but I've used it in the past
 
Typically these other Distros are built off of older LTS versions. For instance the current PopOS and Mint distros are based off of Ubuntu 24_04 LTS, where as Ubuntu is now on 26_04 for its LTS variant - so the current PopOS is built built off of a 2 year old distro .

Then there's the DE, Ubuntu is based off of Gnome, where as Mint is cinnamon and PopOS is Cosmic. I prefer Cosmic, and you certainly install a different DE.

is there a good reason for this? why not use the current LTS?

How active is the project? In the past there was a number of similar projects, but none managed to gain any ground

FOSS community love to start a million forks and abandon them
 
I'm running Gnome 50 and I have quicklook. I highlight a file, and in many cases it works. I've not used this exhaustively so I can't say how close it gets but it seems to work ell enough for me. I know it doesn't do xlsx files, that's so far the only thing that doesn't work


Can you expound on what/why you needed to add so many tweaks? I'm not looking at specifics, but rather what you found lacking in the Pop_OS' file manager.

When did you last look/use it? For PopOS, Cosmic went through a major update last year, instead of being bolted on top of Gnome, they system 76 built it as a complete standalone DE. It had some teething problems in the beginning of the year but it seems overall pretty decent. I'm not on the distro, nor do I feel like installing that DE onto my distro, but I've used it in the past

i heard column view is not available o linux nor windows. i can be very wrong. its my favorite way to browse files and folders
 
i heard column view is not available o linux nor windows. i can be very wrong. its my favorite way to browse files and folders
There may be file manager apps available on both Windows and Linux that offer that, but truth be told, I've not some across any. ITs also a feature in Finder that I loathe, so its not something I'm keeping an eye out for.

Having spent my time mostly in windows, its that traditional tree structure that makes the most sense for me - everyone is different, I'm just pointing out I prefer that way of doing things
 
A reminder that cybersecurity is an illusion

A reminder that perfect security is an illusion, and, that better security is a goal, not a static end-state. Your example is a good example of why any system that a user cares about should be using an operating system that is maintained and has a process in place to handle rapid response when necessary.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nugget and S.B.G
The top 20 distros according to DistroWatch

There's some really arcane distros being reported but overall its pretty cool


1777718783773.png
 
There is no reliable source of what really is the most popular distro. But from what I've seen of Linux being used in Public (cafes, public signage, libraries, my big open plan office at work) it's 90% Ubuntu.

As Mac users who want something that a) looks nice b) just works I really think there is no better choice than Ubuntu. Especially as the last Intel Mac is now 5 years old so bleeding edge Linux e.g. Arch is not going to gain you any better hardware support.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FatLouie
I believe Dell still offers Ubuntu installed with support it has been the distro I keep returning to.
 
Last edited:
There is no reliable source of what really is the most popular distro. But from what I've seen of Linux being used in Public (cafes, public signage, libraries, my big open plan office at work) it's 90% Ubuntu.

As Mac users who want something that a) looks nice b) just works I really think there is no better choice than Ubuntu. Especially as the last Intel Mac is now 5 years old so bleeding edge Linux e.g. Arch is not going to gain you any better hardware support.

From researching and testing Mint is even easier (its dead simple). Zorin is a nicer mac looking ubuntu based distro (downside i heard there is only like 3 people working on it) , and functionality wise Pop_OS seems closest to MacOS with cosmic DE.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FatLouie
As always pick a distro and try it they are free if you don't like it delete and try another also the problem with keeping track of the most downloaded distros does not include all the ones out there that simply update their existing distro without downloading an ISO.
 
From researching and testing Mint is even easier (its dead simple). Zorin is a nicer mac looking ubuntu based distro (downside i heard there is only like 3 people working on it) , and functionality wise Pop_OS seems closest to MacOS with cosmic DE.

I use Debian with XFCE. I have used Mint, and it is the only Linux I would recommend to a new user coming from Windows. I did have a purchased copy of a Zorin version, but deleted it. Zorin is nice, but it seems to have these quirks, and I am not so sure I liked the path it was taking.
 
As always pick a distro and try it they are free if you don't like it delete and try another also the problem with keeping track of the most downloaded distros does not include all the ones out there that simply update their existing distro without downloading an ISO.

Ventoy is great for that. Install it on a thumb drive, then add as many different Linux .iso as you have space for, boot, and you can test drive a Linux version.

Ventoy
 
mx linux is a real head scratcher for me. from what i understood its just debian with xfce DE. My only guess is its the biggest distro that does not ship with systemd
Yeah I know, its based off of debian standard, so its using older code then ubuntu which is based off of debian testing branch
 
Another issue to consider is security. In my opinion Mandatory Access Control (MAC) is essential on a modern Linux distro. So either SELinux or AppArmor. These are the distros which have MAC:
  • Fedora
  • Ubuntu
  • OpenSUSE
  • Mint (from Ubuntu)
Also, a question I ask is "Will this distro be around in 10 years time"?

From what I understand Mint is mostly developed by one person, as is only going to be updated once a year from now on.

Fedora gets their money from IBM, Ubuntu from Canonical, and OpenSUSE from SUSE - an enterprise Linux company. None of those are going to disappear.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BSDnostalgia
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.