I'm very surprised Engadget, which is ALWAYS very pro-Apple. only gave this an 81.
this is actually way below XPS 13's review score. and significantly lower than MBA and MBP's score.
Ars Technica offers the most detailed review, thus far.
An interesting definition of positive you have there.
An interesting definition of positive you have there.
An interesting definition of positive you have there.
They mostly seem positive for me too, with many of the reviews saying that they would keep it for ultraportability.
The negative points are ones that we've discussed already at length (lack of ports, weaker than U class processors).
Universally, it seems that they thought it performed better than expected (or at least as expected) for a M class chip.
Most thought it was "warm" under stress but not hot. Reviews were able to run 4K streaming, photoshop.
I would say the biggest disappointment is that, while it seems to work fine with Safari, many tabs open in Chrome slows down the computer. I, however, have noticed that Chrome has really gone downhill lately, especially if you're normally used to having 15+ tabs open at once.
The more negative parts of the reviews were for things I'd never do on this type of ultraportable laptop (video editing, batching files, handbrake).
I thought the reviews would be more negative for the 1.1GHz chip. I'm wondering how much of a real improvement the 1.3GHz chip is and if you could really tell doing everyday tasks. We'll have to wait and see.
Looks positive to me.
Ars Technica and Engadget always impress me with their reviews, yet they are less popular than The Verge and CNET.
About what I expected. I will definitely need to make sure the keyboard works well for long periods of writing--my primary app is Scrivener. My only worry, maybe, is the heat. But, that's what the 14 day return policy is for.
Im sorry but chromebooks dont do nearly as much. I can't use photoshop on a Chrome book or do my coding without hacking the chromebook to use Ubuntu then ... its automatically a no go for me.I thought these reviews seemed pretty negative...one saying heat went threw his pant leg,and another saying it had lag with more then ten tabs open....if this was only a google chrome issue,then why does my ***$200 asus chromebook*** have no issues at all with heat and can easily run more then 10 tabs open!
For a laptop that cost $1200+,beating a chromebook running chrome browser should be a piece of cake!
Yes the macbook is a beautiful looking piece of hardware,and it has some great tech (retina screen,force touchpad ect) but if it can't handle the world's most popular browser without getting hot and lagging,then is it really worth more then a MS win 8.1 netbook or a chromebook? Let's face it,90% of the time this MacBook will be used to browse the internet,and right now the value vs cost just isn't there!
My Rec: Wait till rev B!
User impressions should be flooding tomorrow, until then I'm definitely holding off.
I'm very surprised Engadget, which is ALWAYS very pro-Apple. only gave this an 81.
this is actually way below XPS 13's review score. and significantly lower than MBA and MBP's score.