sorry for double post, but you know the p2p uses bluetooth?
wasn't there a bluetooth chip in the ipot 2nd gen? or ami imagining it?
I know what the Pre can do, but I don't see how it bests the iPhone. I certainly have much less respect for it: Palm used Apple's web engine and ripped off the iPhone's UI. They did very little on the all-important software side.
The Pre, however, is better than the other so-called iPhone killers. That's why it's being championed by people who have some pathological hatred of the iPhone. The Pre's getting all this attention because it doesn't suck and it's not an iPhone. It's not doing anything on merit.
I maintain the iPhone is the best all-around device right now. The Pre doesn't come close.
iPhone Dev site with iPhone OS 3 Beta is now back up and running.
Go Go Go.
....but the site is, understandably, running hellishly slowly. Nice and overloaded!
I know what the Pre can do, but I don't see how it bests the iPhone. I certainly have much less respect for it: Palm used Apple's web engine and ripped off the iPhone's UI. They did very little on the all-important software side.
The Pre, however, is better than the other so-called iPhone killers. That's why it's being championed by people who have some pathological hatred of the iPhone. The Pre's getting all this attention because it doesn't suck and it's not an iPhone. It's not doing anything on merit. And I wouldn't take any measurements of how fluid it is seriously right now: wait until it's out, then see how fluid it is.
I maintain the iPhone is the best all-around device right now. The Pre doesn't come close.
I was also happy to see notes sync! I saw that you can do the new home page, but was anything mentioned about adding your own picture and custom icons?
What a bad day for palm. Apple pretty much added everything
Most people wanted. I don't care much for extra features...I want stability.
I am just looking for insurance (or better yet, not AT&T). I would even suck up the cost of the plan.![]()
Good article. A lot of those points are actually being addressed in the 3.0 update. I do think the Pre is looking to be pretty good and they have a very nice UI for once, unlike all the other "iPhone killers", but I also think the argument that the Pre can do multitasking because its apps are more akin to webpages/widgets has some merit. Apple did demonstrate today that just running an IM app in the background dramatically reduced battery life. Though I won't be surprised if Apple introduces the 3rd gen iPhone with background tasks (perhaps because of improved battery life).As for the UI, read what Apple could learn from Palm's webOS. The one thing that it has that differs from many other reviews is that it's not biased toward the iPhone simply because of the Apple logo. It gives good insight into what both phones including the Android OS are missing and have.
And the Pre is going to be limited to Sprint, no? That sounds even worse. I really hate this trend of limiting technology to a specific service. Why they don't also release unlocked phones (for a premium) is beyond me.I think the iPhone is the best Mac based phone on the market, something every Mobile Me user and Mac owner should have, but as long as it's on AT&T's network it's a no go for many.
And the Pre is going to be limited to Sprint, no? That sounds even worse. I really hate this trend of limiting technology to a specific service. Why they don't also release unlocked phones (for a premium) is beyond me.
I think the iPhone is the best Mac based phone on the market
....but the site is, understandably, running hellishly slowly. Nice and overloaded!
Sorry, i didnt see if you answered last time. Is it up to the cell phone maker or the carrier to provide insurance?
Good article. A lot of those points are actually being addressed in the 3.0 update. I do think the Pre is looking to be pretty good and they have a very nice UI for once, unlike all the other "iPhone killers", but I also think the argument that the Pre can do multitasking because its apps are more akin to webpages/widgets has some merit. Apple did demonstrate today that just running an IM app in the background dramatically reduced battery life. Though I won't be surprised if Apple introduces the 3rd gen iPhone with background tasks (perhaps because of improved battery life).
And the Pre is going to be limited to Sprint, no? That sounds even worse. I really hate this trend of limiting technology to a specific service. Why they don't also release unlocked phones (for a premium) is beyond me.
I predict it will be possible, but honestly its not really a big feature so they didnt go over it. I mean, you cant really elaborate on that at all.
True, I was forgetting that when I posted. Would be nice if 4G changes things. Verizon has recently been beating the crap out of AT&T in terms of coverage in my county and I'd consider switching if I could use a 4G iPhone with them.Well, at least with Sprint vs. AT&T it's an issue of CDMA vs GSM. Of course, yes, device makers probably could also make different versions (obviously many do already) with appropriate radios in them. However, a lot of the "device exclusivity" is done by carriers offering lots of money (or in the iPhone's case, being willing to offer money AND take a risk on Apple's demands) to try and attract switchers/new customers.
Some of this might disappear when 4G networks based on LTE start being deployed, as at least Verizon and AT&T have said they'll be using the same technology there.
True, I was forgetting that when I posted. Would be nice if 4G changes things. Verizon has recently been beating the crap out of AT&T in terms of coverage in my county and I'd consider switching if I could use a 4G iPhone with them.![]()