Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I am wondering what the behavior of Live Photos will be like in El Capitan... Maybe it recognize it and keep them together...

Because of the way Live Photos work, combining a MOV file with a JPG file, the full Live Photo experience will only be viewable on iOS devices that run iOS 9, the Apple Watch with watchOS 2, and Macs running OS X El Capitan.
 
One would think they could've easily implemented this on the 6, or even 5x models. You can hold the button for burst mode, why not for live photos as well? No 3D force necessary. I also think there is a growing need for this, especially with everyone now using their phone as a primary camera.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PrimeMatrix
10 year old "new feature"...
I guess the real news is the memory compression here?

now let's hope it'll be more open than the thunderbolt standards Apple designed a few years ago

edit: Nokia introduced it 1y 1/2 ago, I thought someone else did earlier but can't find any info, so I was wrong on 10years
http://lumiaconversations.microsoft...hose-moving-moments-with-nokia-living-images/

I never guessed for "a moment" that this was some new file format or whiz-bang new feature that Apple thought of first. Because that's not the point. Apple brings capabilities and experiences to consumers in an elegant and user-friendly way. That's all this is.

And Apple did not design Thunderbolt... Intel did, with contributions from Apple. The problem is that Intel has two competing technologies... USB and Thunderbolt, and they are both racing to better the other. Apple is embracing both at the same time to see which one better fits their products.
 
I am wondering what the behavior of Live Photos will be like in El Capitan... Maybe it recognize it and keep them together...

I'm thinking El Capitan will have an auto-album for Live Photos, the way the make auto-albums for Panorama's, video, slow mo, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PrimeMatrix
Now I'm sure somebody recently said 'it's not a video' and 'they don't take up much more space than a photo'.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mrgraff
10 year old "new feature"...
I guess the real news is the memory compression here?

now let's hope it'll be more open than the thunderbolt standards Apple designed a few years ago

edit: Nokia introduced it 1y 1/2 ago, I thought someone else did earlier but can't find any info, so I was wrong on 10years
http://lumiaconversations.microsoft...hose-moving-moments-with-nokia-living-images/
Nope, HTC did it over 2 years ago on the one m7, under the name htc zoe.. Worked a treat..
 
  • Like
Reactions: Xultar and apolloa
I assume the movie file is lower resolution than the still, but what if a single frame in the movies has a better pose? Can you chose a better looking frame from the movie, and using morphing techniques, the software could take high resolution textures from the hi-res still photo and make a new composite that looks better?
 
  • Like
Reactions: tongxinshe
It's funny. Before these reviews, Live Photos was overlooked and written off as just a gimmick, but now its being considered the best feature so far. All of the reviews that have gone out so far has praised it.

Yep, it is the Apple effect in full force. It is funny though; similar features have been available on other platforms but never been called more than useless gimmicks in most reviews.

A couple of examples are 'Animated photo' and 'Sound and shot' which both debuted on the Samsung Galaxy S4 and Note 4 in 2013. Not very different from Live Photos, but no one saw the point of moving pictures - or pictures with sound - when you could just as well use the movie feature...
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.