Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

derek1984

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Nov 5, 2008
728
108
I'm trying to decide if spending about an extra $250 is worth getting a 2.8 MBP model. I'm going to be using my MBP for pretty basic things like surfing the net, putting pictures I take with my digital camera on there, itunes, and ichat. Logic Studio will probably be the only really large program I plan on using. I also plan on buying Snow Leopard when it comes out. I hope to get a good 4 years out of this computer so I don't mind spending the extra cash if it will make a difference in the long run. Should I go with the 2.8 or the 2.53? Thanks
 
You'll upgrade the CPU now, feel good for a while, but when new models come, you're not going to care anymore, and you'll be out $250.

Will you notice a performance difference? Not in daily use. Maybe if you were encoding video, you'd save some time, but that's only if you have something to compare it too, and it's not a substantial amount. I know from experience.

Save the money and upgrade the RAM or HDD to SSD.
 
I'm trying to decide if spending about an extra $250 is worth getting a 2.8 MBP model. I'm going to be using my MBP for pretty basic things like surfing the net, putting pictures I take with my digital camera on there, itunes, and ichat. Logic Studio will probably be the only really large program I plan on using. I also plan on buying Snow Leopard when it comes out. I hope to get a good 4 years out of this computer so I don't mind spending the extra cash if it will make a difference in the long run. Should I go with the 2.8 or the 2.53? Thanks

get the 2.8 i had it used it with logic and never ran into a system overload problem. i loved it. i actually sold it only to buy the new 17 inch.. i kinda regret it tho..
 
You'll upgrade the CPU now, feel good for a while, but when new models come, you're not going to care anymore, and you'll be out $250.

Will you notice a performance difference? Not in daily use. Maybe if you were encoding video, you'd save some time, but that's only if you have something to compare it too, and it's not a substantial amount. I know from experience.

Save the money and upgrade the RAM or HDD to SSD.

The new models are always coming... and $250 will be easily made back in 5 years.

Just get the 2.8, unless your really stuck for money.
 
get the 2.8 i had it used it with logic and never ran into a system overload problem. i loved it. i actually sold it only to buy the new 17 inch.. i kinda regret it tho..

i can say the same for the 2.53.
i never ran into a system overload.
i think for logic is more relevant to get a 7200rpm disk, because cpu never really bumped into a problem, but disk.. hah. thats another story. :)
+disk can be very quickly full if you do audio :D so.. firewire hdd is mandatory
by the way, i said 7200rpm intentionally, because SSD has crummy write speeds, so if you plan to do any serious recording... but if you dont than SSD is fine anyway.
 
I'm with repo on this. You won't notice the difference between a 2.53 and a 2,8 GHz computer. Get the full complement of memory though (you'll need it). My laptop is a 15" 2.53 GHz with 4 GB RAM; jnever had a problem (and I am running many many synthesizers at once in Logic and MainStage).
 
that AND
you can always Freeze a track you are currently not editing. :)
i never had to before though. :)
 
Wit Logic, you want to make sure you have more RAM over anything else - I have an AU that needs an entire GB RAM just to sit active!!
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.