Well if they wanted to be "provocative," I guess it worked: this was probably the most anyone's talked about Logitech in years.The mouse mentioned is not an actual or planned product but a peek into provocative internal thinking
Well if they wanted to be "provocative," I guess it worked: this was probably the most anyone's talked about Logitech in years.The mouse mentioned is not an actual or planned product but a peek into provocative internal thinking
"Imagine no possessions - I wonder if you can. No need for greed or hunger. A brotherhood of man..."You’ll own nothing and be happy
During the same interview, the CEO mentioned the circleview doorbell wasn’t sold anymore (it’s still for sale on the Logitech site), so it seems like the CEO really doesn’t have a clue…Well, what they write is a polite form for:
„our CEO has no clue about our products, but likes to use the word „subscription“ a lot“
It did not have any legs to grow until the media twisted Faber's words to make it look like that it was her that had come up with the idea of subscription for the forever mouse. Then of course it got traction because people reading the media articles assumed (wrongly) that the company chief was looking to financially exploit it's users by introducing a mouse subscription. This was never the case.It shouldn’t have taken a full week for them to deny the article. Logitech PR allowed this story to grow legs.
Who cares, the rest of the podcast is sprinkled with her criticisms of Logitech’s previous leadership for not charging ongoing fees in enterprise to use their video conferencing software, and for their shopping carts averaging $26. The “forever mouse” as a luxury timepiece analogy is clear even without the “subscribe to your mouse” ragebait; it’s super clear she envisions a future where Logitech is dropping limited edition gold-plated Louis Vuitton mouse collabs and Porsche Design carbon fiber mechanical keyboards.If you take the time to actually listen to the podcast you will find that it is actually the podcaster Nilay Patel that puts the idea of a subscription mouse into the head of Logitech's chief Hanneke Faber which she then run's with. At no point in that podcast do you hear Faber being the first one to suggest forever mouse subscription. Patel is the one that does it and then you can hear Faber just goes with the flow saying she thinks it's a good idea, an idea put into her head by Patel.
Therefore there needs to be very clear reporting on this because at no point did Faber make the suggestion of a subscription model for a forever mouse, that suggestion originated from podcaster Nilay Patel. Faber just happened to agree with him.
The post from MR just shows how Faber's comments on the forever mouse have been distorted by the media.
This is why Logitech PR has come out and said what they said because people that have listened to the podcast think they know what Faber is saying without actually knowing what she is saying. They then misreport it and those that read the media articles are then given a narrative that is wrong, hence the backlash forcing Logitech to issue a statement.Who cares, the rest of the podcast is sprinkled with her criticisms of Logitech’s previous leadership for not charging ongoing fees in enterprise to use their video conferencing software, and for their shopping carts averaging $26. The “forever mouse” as a luxury timepiece analogy is clear even without the “subscribe to your mouse” ragebait; it’s super clear she envisions a future where Logitech is dropping limited edition gold-plated Louis Vuitton mouse collabs and Porsche Design carbon fiber mechanical keyboards.
In the forever mouse answer she said it would have “great software and services” and “can you come up with a service model” after knocking the old CEO for not charging for software. We know what “services” are.
The point is she’s newly in control of an object her customers use and touch and rely on every day and smells an opportunity to 2x or 5x the value she can extract per head. Maybe she’s not wrong, but you can’t pretend Nilay was putting words in her mouth
Agreed.Damage control for a CEO who sounds like she is out of touch with how tech consumers think and behave. Prior to Logitech, she was in Unilever. It is as if she noticed so many things are going subscription and going green, and it's just a good idea to jam these things together and shove the costs on to the consumers and yank some long-term revenue for the company. Consumers see through this and are not having it. The strange thing is, she must be a consumer herself, and she didn't think there would be push back against something absurd like this?
Exactly!I just can’t comprehend what ongoing software updates would be useful for mice in the first place!