ATD said:A few things are standing out on all of them that I would work on.
Your graphic is overwhelming the type both in size and importance, personally I would have the type read way up front then the graphic.
Economize. You are using a number of different things to support your concept, start subtracting. Hit one point home hard. To many ideas just dilute your message.
They feel a little too light and airy.
I agree. Keep with a regular "L".schaef2493 said:I have no experience from design, but I feel the L building really isn't needed and adds confusion.
This is a lot better than your first ones. It's getting there. I think what eyup posted above is a little more like what you should go for.switters said:so here's another example using your critique:
Unless they specialize in super modern architecture.irmongoose said:Concerning eyup's version, I think it looks too "sci-fi" for an architecture company.