Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Roderick Usher

macrumors regular
Original poster
Dec 9, 2006
182
1
Why do logo changes suck 90% of the time?


Bad examples:

6.gif


5.gif


7.jpg


8.gif


9.gif


14.gif


15.gif


Good examples:

10.gif


11.gif


13.gif
 
Tropicana and Blimpie ones suck the others are kind of nice.

I guess they suck more to you because your used to them?
 
Part of it is because you are used to existing designs. To me, though, a lot of modern redesigns suck because they are designed from committees and focus groups, rather than the good artistic design. Thus, you often end up with designs that are bland, boring, and that look like competitors. (Gotta keep up with those other guys).
 

I saw that new design recently, and had to do a double take. I didn't recognize it at all. Again, this looks like another design by committee. This is something else I've never figured out about these redesigns. What about the brand recognizition? Everybody knows the Ford blue oval, for example, so why go and change it to something nobody knows?
 
I was going to come in here and just talk about how we simply bond with older designs because its what we know. But I've not seen half of them and the old ones still look better.

Not seen that Barclaycard one yet. Things ugly and reminds me more of BT. I don't even see a B in that logo. That old one wasn't pretty either though.
 
I actually like most of the ones you posted as bad examples! The Blimpie one was better before (not sure who Blimpie are though) but the others look nicer.
 
The new Tropicana design is pretty horrible...not only does it look worse than the last iteration, but it actually makes it harder to tell the different types of juice apart.
 
Didn't we go through all this with Pepsi?? :(

When I first saw the new Pepsi logo I immediately thought it could easily pass as a new Korean Airlines logo.

The new Air France design has a nice font. But the new Tropicana thing looks horrible.
 

Attachments

  • 2969469986_58df961085.jpg
    2969469986_58df961085.jpg
    8.3 KB · Views: 164
  • KOREAN+AIR.jpg
    KOREAN+AIR.jpg
    4.7 KB · Views: 167
All the new ones look better except for Tropicana, Sunkist, and Blimpy. The Red Sox use both. Neither of them are really new. I kinda like the old Sysco better.
 
Looking at the examples you give, I'd suggest that they only suck 70% of the time.

I'm in agreement.

Some of those logos had to change, and when they did, they ended up better.



However, as I'm not American and don't have any sort of childhood attachment to the previous logo, maybe my opinion is a bit too objective. I'm not their target audience, after all. It looks good to me because I don't care. ;)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.