Not a very good one, if he is reliant on customer mistakes. That's normally Microsoft's sales strategy.Maybe Apple is going to make the same mistake, let's see how good of a salesman our mayor is.
Not a very good one, if he is reliant on customer mistakes. That's normally Microsoft's sales strategy.Maybe Apple is going to make the same mistake, let's see how good of a salesman our mayor is.
Some yank bought London Bridge thinking it was tower bridge![]()
Not a very good one, if he is reliant on customer mistakes. That's normally Microsoft's sales strategy.
Boris is a bumbling buffoon. And I say that as a Londoner.
Just remember where the original London Bridge is now and you'll see the real power transfer.Yup Londoners love thier bridges , and people across the world come to London to visit themwe even sell them , but don't buy London Bridge , may not be the one you think it is
![]()
Which part? McCulloch did buy a bridge. Question is, was he conned....
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_Bridge_(Lake_Havasu_City)
Read your own citation as you clearly didn't bother with mine. It has a section called 'In Popular Culture'.
Why is an American entrepreneur buying an obsolete old bridge that was unsuitable for the increased volume of modern traffic and would otherwise have been demolished evidence of "the real power transfer"?Just remember where the original London Bridge is now and you'll see the real power transfer.
Awesome , you found one citation on the "web" which clearly invalidates all the other "theories" around this "wife's tail"...
I'll be honest, I don't exactly use webcitation.org as fact....
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_Bridge_(Lake_Havasu_City)#cite_note-9It is a popular rumor that the bridge was bought in the belief that it was London's more recognizable Tower Bridge,[6][7][8] but this was ardently denied by McCulloch himself and by Ivan Luckin, who sold the bridge.[9]
MH01, do the world a favour and actually read what is quoted both me and linked by yourself before making any more awesome comments. You have clearly done neither, otherwise you would have realised that webcitation is nothing but an internet archiver and is hosting a local newspaper article from many years ago, which had an interview with all parties concerned.
Even the Wikipedia article you linked to (of course Wikipedia is FACT) pours cold water over your theory:
Thanks for somehow making 'wife's tail' out of wives tale. I did like that.
Boris likes to play the bumbling buffoon in public and this seems to be fooling a lot of people. Ask anyone who has had to deal with him. A lot more ruthless and calculating behind the scenes.