Switch your camera to aperture priority and dial the aperture in to the largest value - f/36 in your case.
Take a read of the shutter speed - that is the
slowest you can go in that situation to obtain a correct exposure.
Any slower than this speed your images will become overexposed, because you are letting in more light (more time) than required for a correct exposure.
So if I were to get a better lens, it would still be limited by the camera? Is this correct?
I'll give a filter a try. Thanks all.
Buying a "better" lens won't fix your problem - better lenses aren't usually defined by how much you can stop them down, it's quite the opposite.
"Better" is a loose term, but a better lens will
usually have a wider maximum aperture that will let more light in - eg f/2.8
Your camera is fine, it's a trait of all cameras/lenses, it's best not to stop down past f/16.
Diffraction is a natural phenomena where light bends, there is no escaping it
🙂
Hold your finger up to your eye and look at a sharp edge (the edge of your monitor will work as it has good contrast with the screen), you will notice the edge "bend" around your finger (focus on the screen edge, not your finger).
The same thing happens with your camera - when the aperture hole is small, all light entering is close to the edge of the aperture blades and so will bend/interfere resulting in a softer image.
Buying Neutral Density filters is really the only practical way of solving your problem.
I'd recommend a filter holder, so you can stack multiple filters, eg a ND and a ND Grad. I'd also suggest a graduated ND to darken the sky.
Good luck!
🙂