hopefulmacuser
macrumors member
title says most of it =]
so before wwdc i was set on mbp lower end
simply because i can afford it, im sick of my old detoriorating pc(i wanna watch videos on youtube normal speed now yay, aesthetics, cause i love photoshop web design graphic design photo manip all that jazz with adobe creative suite, looking to film edit with imovie and finalcut mildy extensive specifically long documentaries for social justice, and perhaps learn aperture. i also want to be able to multi task alot, and maybe occasionally play light vid games.
so i liked that lower end mbp because of that reason!
now so much has changed to the mbp line its like woahh
the rebranding makes the 13 inch likeable. i do have to admit the 13 is so much lighter, currently i use a 15 inch bulky dell and the apple was better lighter significantly but like still the 13 was like halleleiua man i fail at spelll.
but on the other hand i hear the screen real estate for designing and shizz is so important and editing especially woohoo 2 more inches i dont know ive been on a 15 all through hs so like i dont know the difference yet.
also i heard something about graphics card
so what sucks is i need to get the 2.6 i think to get the graphcs card configurated as what i was originally planning to purchase the two graphcis card shennagans because its apparently good or whatever.
but like now the 15 inch low end mbp is like they dont have that anymore... but it is significantly cheaper...
IDK is it really all that important
currently im leaning towards the 2.6 middle 15 inch mbp because of that graphics card shennagans and the l,arger standard hd space but like i also noticed it says like 256 mb but the higher is 512 what does that do?
so now im just a really confused turtle with money.
high end 13inch low end 15 inch middle end 15 inch or high end 15 inch
i sound like an idiot after this post, little punctuation if in existence, and no caps locks and my terminology. just really lazy. but yeah macs are fun to play with. and can be powerfullllll
so before wwdc i was set on mbp lower end
simply because i can afford it, im sick of my old detoriorating pc(i wanna watch videos on youtube normal speed now yay, aesthetics, cause i love photoshop web design graphic design photo manip all that jazz with adobe creative suite, looking to film edit with imovie and finalcut mildy extensive specifically long documentaries for social justice, and perhaps learn aperture. i also want to be able to multi task alot, and maybe occasionally play light vid games.
so i liked that lower end mbp because of that reason!
now so much has changed to the mbp line its like woahh
the rebranding makes the 13 inch likeable. i do have to admit the 13 is so much lighter, currently i use a 15 inch bulky dell and the apple was better lighter significantly but like still the 13 was like halleleiua man i fail at spelll.
but on the other hand i hear the screen real estate for designing and shizz is so important and editing especially woohoo 2 more inches i dont know ive been on a 15 all through hs so like i dont know the difference yet.
also i heard something about graphics card
so what sucks is i need to get the 2.6 i think to get the graphcs card configurated as what i was originally planning to purchase the two graphcis card shennagans because its apparently good or whatever.
but like now the 15 inch low end mbp is like they dont have that anymore... but it is significantly cheaper...
IDK is it really all that important
currently im leaning towards the 2.6 middle 15 inch mbp because of that graphics card shennagans and the l,arger standard hd space but like i also noticed it says like 256 mb but the higher is 512 what does that do?
so now im just a really confused turtle with money.
high end 13inch low end 15 inch middle end 15 inch or high end 15 inch
i sound like an idiot after this post, little punctuation if in existence, and no caps locks and my terminology. just really lazy. but yeah macs are fun to play with. and can be powerfullllll