✅
If they do release that low-cost MacBook with an A18, could it be that did so because it is Apple Intelligence compatible whereas the M1 is not? I don’t know if the M4 or M5 chip is more expensive than the A18.
The reason is simple. The A18 Pro is cheaper because it's 20% smaller than M1 and 50% smaller than M4. It outperforms M1.
Rule number one of Tim Cook Apple.
It’s always about increasing margins.
Always.
Literally 95% of Tim Cook's compensation is dependent on variable pay (stock awards and performance bonuses). If 95% depends on how shareholders react and company reaching specific financial targets, you know what choices they'll make.
A-B-I-M. A... Always, B... Be, I... Increasing, M… Margins. Always be increasing margins. ALWAYS BE INCREASING MARGINS!Rule number one of Tim Cook Apple.
It’s always about increasing margins.
Always.
There are zero issues running macOS on an A-series chip. None.Not sure how you could get macOS to run on an A19 chip, but if you could it would seem that an iPhone could double as "macbook" by plugging in the necessary peripherals via a special port 🙂
Wow, this is big news if true. First I'd heard of this because Apple Intelligence originally launched as supporting all M chips. However, I kind of doubt that, because it also says M2 or higher for the MacBook Pro line, and same for the Mac Pro line, and my M1 Pro MBP definitely still supports Apple Silicon, and we've not heard or seen AS being dropped after M1 folks update to Tahoe, so I think that's probably a typo of some kind.If they do release that low-cost MacBook with an A18, could it be that did so because it is Apple Intelligence compatible whereas the M1 is not? I don’t know if the M4 or M5 chip is more expensive than the A18.
YOU couldn't get macOS running on an A__ chip, but APPLE could, since (you know) they make the darn things.Not sure how you could get macOS to run on an A19 chip, but if you could it would seem that an iPhone could double as "macbook" by plugging in the necessary peripherals via a special port 🙂
If Google is correct (your previous post) saying an M4 is cheaper than an A18, then why would Apple trying to make a cheap MacBook not go with the cheaper processor? iPads with M chips and a MacBook (rumored) with an A … seems odd. Unless the new laptop just looks like one but in reality is an “iPad AirBook”, i.e. an iOS laptop … maybe replacing the iPad Air.YOU couldn't get macOS running on an A__ chip, but APPLE could, since (you know) they make the darn things.
A__ chips and M__ chips are very, very similar. M-chips are designed for computers while A-chips are designed for iPhones and iPads, but they are all Arm chips and very similar architecturally.
I supposed that based on Gemini's "Answers" which gives a different response based on the exact question - so, completely unreliable.If Google is correct (your previous post) saying an M4 is cheaper than an A18, then why would Apple trying to make a cheap MacBook not go with the cheaper processor? iPads with M chips and a MacBook (rumored) with an A … seems odd. Unless the new laptop just looks like one but in reality is an “iPad AirBook”, i.e. an iOS laptop … maybe replacing the iPad Air.