Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
How much is MS paying you? This has to be a joke.

Name a single decent synthesizer (music keyboard) app for Windows Phone. Name a single decent multi-track audio editing software. What's a good code editor with dropbox support? What's a good FTP client that can unzip files? What's a good Reddit client? How about an aurora tracker? Starmap? Financial tracker with realtime updates for each bank account, stock account, credit scores? I could keep going but why?

if you would read my post I said that every app 'I' needed was there. I also suggested that the OP check out the MS store to see if there was anything he needed that wasn't there.

Apple Maps works great actually. I also have Google Maps for iOS and the Tom Tom GPS app.

Apple maps and Google are both good. But Nokia Drive simply works better in my opinion. Especially if the OP is spending much time in Europe -you know, where Nokia is LOCATED.

Actually there is comparison. Nokia thinks megapixels are everything. I would not argue that 1020 has a decent camera on it. However I would question whether it "wins" because what you are using, and what kind of light you are in, will determine whether it wins. Also, if you are shooting video or stills, will also determine this. Are you taking a snapshot to post on Facebook or text to someone? All the extra pixels won't matter. iPhone 5S can shoot super fast sequences of full-rez photos and you just pick the best one. The 120FPS video at 720P is very cool also.

megapixels aren't everything, you are correct there. But check out the hardware. And go read some reviews. The iPhone camera is good, but the Nokia cameras are simply better, most especially in low light.

I think 8MP is more than enough for a camera phone for posting online, texting, printing enlargements up to 16x20", etc. I think the 5S will produce better lowlight color. YMMV, but 41MP files of the 1020 will eat up all your memory and ultimately you will rarely utilize this, and only in perfect lighting. In which case, the only benefit is you can blow up more into the pixels.

at least you admit here that this is simply your opinion. And it's hard to even think you know what your talking about when you state that it will 'eat up your memory'. Sheesh, it's not memory, it's storage. There is a difference.

Ah, another feature copied from Apple.. no offense.

Oh just stop with the 'copied from BS. There were app stores for smart phones long before Apple ever got into the game. I bought my first smart phone in 2003 and was buying apps way back then. There's so much 'copying' back and forth it's a really stupid claim. Apple didn't invent the smart phone, nor did they invent the 'app' store.


Yeah, that would be a nice feature for Apple to copy back. Of course, given how cheap apps are, I don't feel bad on the rare occasions I waste $1.99 due to a particular App really sucking. Most of them have a free version to try, but Apple prefers to leave it up to the dealer.

Glad you don't mind. But no, there aren't always free versions, and when there are they aren't always a full version. Trials have been around for years. Stop apologizing for Apple. They don't give trials because they don't care. They get their 30% whether the app works for you or not. Personally I think it's a rather sad state but it's their store so they can do as they want.

And no, I don't work for MS. That seems to be the standard statement around here when someone says anything positive about any product that's not Apple's. But there is some really nice tech out there made by other companies. Some of us buy and use what works best for us, regardless of the maker. Claiming that someone must 'work' for another company just because they have something positive to say about said company is a rather childish thing to say. I swear, sometimes it seems like some folks here seem to have their personal self-esteem tied to a multi-national corporation.

Anyway the OP asked some questions. You gave your opinion about the iPhone. That's good. But I gave mine about the 1020 and Nokia phones in general. The OP needs a balanced set of facts in order to make an informed decision. I don't care which way he goes. I only hope he's happy with his decision.
 
Well, you are on macrumors :rolleyes:

Yes, I happen to own several iPads. Plus I'm interested in the new iPhones because my daughter-in-law is up for a new phone. So I'm researching for her. I'm thinking of recommending the 5C (she prefers smaller phones).

I wasn't aware that there was a rule that I wasn't allowed to be on macrumors unless every piece of tech I own was Apple. Plus I suppose you think that I should also think that Apple can do no wrong to 'qualify'?

:rolleyes too:
 
Darkgoob clearly has no clue what the camera on the 1020 is about or what it can do. Ignore him on those counts, nothing he said is correct.

As to choosing between the two, the iPhone is clearly the better all-rounder. It might not be the best at anything it does, but it does everything pretty damn well. On the other hand, the Lumia really excels at photography and the Nokia add-ons are really good, especially Here navigation in offline is a killer when traveling. It has other upsides over the iPhone as well, like the screen and display techs.

All in all it's a matter of preference, I'd say. If your use of the phone is mostly around the things the Lumia is good at, it is probably the better choice. If camera, nav and MS services do not interest you, get the iPhone.
 
BTW the extra pixels being used to produce better lowlight images, and not being saved that way: I think that is a special mode the thing has. You get 5MP total in that mode right? Isn't there a mode to save all 41MP?

And no, I don't work for MS. That seems to be the standard statement around here when someone says anything positive about any product that's not Apple's.

I was just giving you a hard time...! But I do find it incredulous that someone would only want the apps M$ has available, unless they were being paid to look no further than that. But I guess non-creative types who don't code and have no interest in science or music do typically go Microsoft. That sounds haughty and arrogant, but it's not meant that way; I think it's been the case that Apple folk have typically been the academic/creative/artist/programmer types, and less so the business/gamer types. Shrugs.

But there is some really nice tech out there made by other companies. Some of us buy and use what works best for us, regardless of the maker. Claiming that someone must 'work' for another company just because they have something positive to say about said company is a rather childish thing to say. I swear, sometimes it seems like some folks here seem to have their personal self-esteem tied to a multi-national corporation.

Nah, I am just calling it like it is. And, companies DO pay people to come to forums and write messages exactly like yours: it's a great form of advertising. To act like questioning your motives is childish, is childish. I have every right to wonder if M$ is paying you to come to the iPhone forums on launch day and pump their latest phone in this thread. And I have valid reasons to suspect the would do this.

After all M$ has also been seeding lots of YouTube reviews of 1020 and tagging them with "iPhone 5S." Why wouldn't they also come to the iPhone forums somewhere and spam about their new phone, posing as an innocent user? In fact companies do this sort of thing all the time, and if you aren't getting paid then maybe you should be. Of course you could say the same thing of my statements, but then, I've been just as critical of the iOS on this board if you read my other threads. Usually, I'm here calling out Apple for some form of BS, like the fact iOS 7 looked too white and is an eyesore in that regard — just like Office 2013.

Anyway the OP asked some questions. You gave your opinion about the iPhone. That's good. But I gave mine about the 1020 and Nokia phones in general. The OP needs a balanced set of facts in order to make an informed decision. I don't care which way he goes. I only hope he's happy with his decision.

Fair enough. As we both know, these are first-world problems: to have the luxury to debate which expensive phone to buy! They are all far more than anything I had as a kid, growing up. Nokia makes solid products, and their camera is certainly innovative. But saying the flash of Nokia is "best" or there is "no comparison" of the cameras is very much not "a balanced set of facts". DPreview has an excellent review of these phones' cameras, though they did not include the 5S yet (though perhaps they have by now). The pixel-level clarity of Lumia 1020's 5MP files was certainly nice, and you can see the benefit of the pixel down-sampling they are doing. But the other devices in the test (Galaxy S4, iPhone 5) all look great; and DPReview's methodology of taking pictures of a static "test scene" does not result in knowing much about how a camera will perform in the real world. It just tells you how it will perform in a well-lit environment when taking pictures of a static scene.

There are many other factors that matter like AF speed, face detection accuracy, optical zoom, image stabilization, light metering, white balance, video quality, manual controls, shutter lag, frames per second, camera ready time, etc. Ultimately on all counts, regarding the Op's question of if his existing Canon point-and-shoot beats a smartphone, we must conclude that it does, because of all these other factors where camera phones still fall short. The cameras on phones like 1020 and 5S are good, but are severely limited in many ways, and therefore it should not be your only camera. You'll be glad in 5 or 10 years if you have a lot of great pix taken from a real camera to look back on — and not just a bunch of phone pictures all shot from the same focal length.
 
Darkgoob clearly has no clue what the camera on the 1020 is about or what it can do. Ignore him on those counts, nothing he said is correct.

Actually, I do know. I've read several detailed reviews of it. Everything I have said is correct.

It records around an 11 MB file when in 41MP mode. iPhone 5S's images are under 3MB.

Source:
http://m.dpreview.com/articles/2170241431/iphone-5s-studio-comparison

And there you can even download a 41MP file of a 1020. It's got an impressive amount of detail, in that scenario. Ultimately it's very limited as a camera, over-all, compared to almost any point-and-shoot camera. I'd challenge you to read DPReviews full articles on these and take them as your source for specs and facts; I am here to give my opinion which is that considering all the facts, all these phone cameras are fairly limited and you don't need to be a pro photographer to want a P&S camera, small ILC, or DSLR. Camera phones are useful, no doubt, but it's ludicrous to suggest any current one is so far superior to the others, when if you print an 8x10" print from any of these test samples, you won't be able to see a difference except in the white balance. Go ahead try it for yourself; I am a photographer, I already did, just out of curiosity.

Obviously pro photographers who might blow up an image to a 40x60" print could get better detail out of a 41MP file, but then, I already said that, and the op isn't doing prints like that, and made it clear he's not a pro.

As to choosing between the two, the iPhone is clearly the better all-rounder. It might not be the best at anything it does, but it does everything pretty damn well. On the other hand, the Lumia really excels at photography and the Nokia add-ons are really good, especially Here navigation in offline is a killer when traveling. It has other upsides over the iPhone as well, like the screen and display techs.

All in all it's a matter of preference, I'd say. If your use of the phone is mostly around the things the Lumia is good at, it is probably the better choice. If camera, nav and MS services do not interest you, get the iPhone.

The iPhone 5S camera is really excellent so far in my tests. The burst mode is awesome. The 120FPS video is great. The 2-tone flash I have not tested yet, but then, I don't prefer flash photography.

Navigation on the 5S works perfectly with the compass not requiring calibration as much with the new M7 chip. The claim that Nokia has better European maps is irrelevant since you can download the Nokia maps app for iOS already. I'm sure they have good maps but that is not a feature of the phone. It's a feature of the Nokia maps which are available for both phones.

What exactly are "MS services"?

I think it's cool Apple gives away Pages, Numbers, and Keynote now with new iPhone purchases. It's like getting Office for free, though personally, I'd prefer it if MS made Office apps for iOS just like they do for Mac. Hopefully they are working on this. It would be a shame to see them deliberately not introduce software products for iOS just because they want to get people onto their mobile platform.

I am not trying to denigrate MS, BTW, I am glad they are not resting on laurels and are out there competing and fighting for this market. It certainly keeps things interesting. I love iOS, it being the original. I have owned Apple handhelds since I got my original Newton in 1993. In fact my Newton MessagePad 120 still works perfectly! But I'd take a Microsoft phone over an Android device any day.
 
Yes, I happen to own several iPads. Plus I'm interested in the new iPhones because my daughter-in-law is up for a new phone. So I'm researching for her. I'm thinking of recommending the 5C (she prefers smaller phones).

I wasn't aware that there was a rule that I wasn't allowed to be on macrumors unless every piece of tech I own was Apple. Plus I suppose you think that I should also think that Apple can do no wrong to 'qualify'?

:rolleyes too:

You are allowed to post here, it's fine LOL. I own many Macs and Newtons going back to my 512ke. I have owned Nokia phones, Samsung phones, even Sharp! I have a Sony Android tablet, PS3, and PS VITA, and I've been on XBOX LIVE for 10 years! I mainly shoot Olympus Micro Four Thirds, and Sony Cybershot cameras.


You know speaking of this, if Sony had a VITA-based phone that would really be interesting. I actually found I really love the PS VITA OS. If you have never played with one, I highly suggest you do... used ones are only around $150 now.
 
i don't understand why your one criteria in getting a phone is it's camera, really?

I don't either, a camera on my phone is not that important. Yet Apple is really promoting the camera this year since nothing else is exciting. In doing so, they reach the women who's priorities always favour camera's.
 
The camera on a phone for me its just a plus when im caught without any camera and i need some photos to do.

But the real differences here and anywhere when you pick a smartphone now is:

Your security is a must for what do you have in your personal phone? If yes-iPhones5s
You like app-apple ecosystem so -iphone 5s
you use a phone just for some basic tasks (i mean your life is not your smartphone)- again choose iphone5s
You like premium more stylish and compact devices- iphone 5s

For the rest pick Lumia
 
I am not trying to denigrate MS, BTW, I am glad they are not resting on laurels and are out there competing and fighting for this market. It certainly keeps things interesting. I love iOS, it being the original. I have owned Apple handhelds since I got my original Newton in 1993. In fact my Newton MessagePad 120 still works perfectly! But I'd take a Microsoft phone over an Android device any day.

Your first post in this thread was exactly that though and just slammed Microsoft and Windows Phone.

If you have to ask if you should get an iOS or Windows Phone device, it tells me that you can't tell the difference anyway, which means you are not worthy of owning an iOS device. That sounds really arrogant, but seriously, Windows Phone is a piece of s*** compared to iOS. It's not even close.

You really did NOT need to be that rude towards the OP.

Get the original. Get the best.

Wasn't there the Palm OS and Windows Mobile before iOS?

OP, go for the 5s. It's the better phone of the two and will best fit your needs .
 
If I were in your situation I would go with the 5s, however you seem to really enjoy the Windows Phones so go with that. Only you can determine what makes you happy. I dont like that bulge but it still seems to be a good phone regardless.
 
I have a Windows 7.5 phone (the Lumia 710), and love it. I am upgrading, and the choice is between the iPhone 5S 32 GB ($299) vs. the Lumia 1020 ($199), both AT&T.

Things I like about the Lumia 1020:

-The Industrial Design of it.
-The screen size of it.
-The camera of it.
-The UI of it.

Things I like about the iPhone:

-The app ecosystem of it.
-The fact it doesn't have a bulge on the back.
-The performance of it.

Questions I have concerning both:

-Do you think the iPhone's camera is comparable to the Lumia 1020's?
-Do you think the battery life of the iPhone is better than the Lumia's?
-Can the Lumia 1020 completely replace my point and shoot?
-Will the Nokia's 2 year old dual-core processor be enough in 2 years for web browsing, taking photos, listening to music, etc.? 4 years seems ancient for cell phone processors.

----------

Another thing that concerns me is that I am going to Rome and then Sweden for industrial design classes, both months at a time. Will I be able to use these phones while over there? Will they have plenty of apps to help navigate streets, find restaurants, etc. while over there? That is also a reason why I am leaning towards the 1020, as I don't want to carry a point and shoot camera around. Is the 1020 truly as good quality as a point and shoot?

Definitely get the Lumia!!! Save the iPhones for people who really want them.
 
In an Apple forum you're likely going to get biased results. I myself am an Apple fanboy and love the iPhone but I also know that I can't fairly give perspective on the Lumia. What I do know is that I am consumed in Apple's ecosystem so I will always have an iPhone, at least in the foreseeable future. The ease and seamless integration of all Apple's services work great for me.
 
Microsoft may not be leading the pack these days, and I really disliked Windows 8 after a bit, but after installing Windows 8.1 I love it. Easy to use and I love the metro look.

I'd have nothing against a Windows phone, I just prefer Apple and iOS/iTunes feel.
 
I have a 1020, 5S and Sony Xperia Z1 all in use now.

1020 takes the best photos on a phone. No point even trying to argue that point. Nokia provide a lot of add on in terms of apps and services. But windows phone does have the weakest app store selection. However, I was surprised that I only was missing one app that I needed. There are workarounds and solutions.

5S vs Z1 http://gavinsgadgets.wordpress.com/...xperia-z1-share-you-view-on-the-better-phone/ have a look at my camera shootout and you decide. From my eyes, the 5S took more natural shots in terms of colours. But otherwise it is your call as to which you prefer.
 
I have a 1020, 5S and Sony Xperia Z1 all in use now.

1020 takes the best photos on a phone. No point even trying to argue that point. Nokia provide a lot of add on in terms of apps and services. But windows phone does have the weakest app store selection. However, I was surprised that I only was missing one app that I needed. There are workarounds and solutions.

5S vs Z1 http://gavinsgadgets.wordpress.com/...xperia-z1-share-you-view-on-the-better-phone/ have a look at my camera shootout and you decide. From my eyes, the 5S took more natural shots in terms of colours. But otherwise it is your call as to which you prefer.

Yes but you can still say that iphone 5s has the best 8MP camera
 
While the Lumia has a better camera, the one on the iPhone 5S is pretty good as well. Personally, I don't like the Metro UI and the ecosystem for Windows Phone is not the greatest. I'd go with the iPhone 5S.
 
As a photographer, I would say that the Nokia Pureview camera and the iPhone 5S camera are very comparable. They both use a f/2.2 lens although Apple's has 5 elements as opposed to the Zeiss Aspherical 6 element. In terms of low light performance, the only reason why the Pureview camera has low noise is due to down sampling which means an 8 MP photo in the Pureview camera has less noise than the iPhone due to the 41 megapixels getting condensed to 5 or 8 megapixels. The 5S camera still has good low light performance due to the larger pixels in their sensor. It's pretty much a wash when down sampled. The xenon flash on the Nokia is pretty good. Compared to the dual LED in the 5S, I think you get more range on the xenon. Overall, I still prefer the 5S camera just due to a more purist view of photography. It doesn't employ tricks to get good image quality.
 
BTW the extra pixels being used to produce better lowlight images, and not being saved that way: I think that is a special mode the thing has. You get 5MP total in that mode right? Isn't there a mode to save all 41MP?



I was just giving you a hard time...! But I do find it incredulous that someone would only want the apps M$ has available, unless they were being paid to look no further than that. But I guess non-creative types who don't code and have no interest in science or music do typically go Microsoft. That sounds haughty and arrogant, but it's not meant that way; I think it's been the case that Apple folk have typically been the academic/creative/artist/programmer types, and less so the business/gamer types. Shrugs.



Nah, I am just calling it like it is. And, companies DO pay people to come to forums and write messages exactly like yours: it's a great form of advertising. To act like questioning your motives is childish, is childish. I have every right to wonder if M$ is paying you to come to the iPhone forums on launch day and pump their latest phone in this thread. And I have valid reasons to suspect the would do this.

After all M$ has also been seeding lots of YouTube reviews of 1020 and tagging them with "iPhone 5S." Why wouldn't they also come to the iPhone forums somewhere and spam about their new phone, posing as an innocent user? In fact companies do this sort of thing all the time, and if you aren't getting paid then maybe you should be. Of course you could say the same thing of my statements, but then, I've been just as critical of the iOS on this board if you read my other threads. Usually, I'm here calling out Apple for some form of BS, like the fact iOS 7 looked too white and is an eyesore in that regard — just like Office 2013.



Fair enough. As we both know, these are first-world problems: to have the luxury to debate which expensive phone to buy! They are all far more than anything I had as a kid, growing up. Nokia makes solid products, and their camera is certainly innovative. But saying the flash of Nokia is "best" or there is "no comparison" of the cameras is very much not "a balanced set of facts". DPreview has an excellent review of these phones' cameras, though they did not include the 5S yet (though perhaps they have by now). The pixel-level clarity of Lumia 1020's 5MP files was certainly nice, and you can see the benefit of the pixel down-sampling they are doing. But the other devices in the test (Galaxy S4, iPhone 5) all look great; and DPReview's methodology of taking pictures of a static "test scene" does not result in knowing much about how a camera will perform in the real world. It just tells you how it will perform in a well-lit environment when taking pictures of a static scene.

There are many other factors that matter like AF speed, face detection accuracy, optical zoom, image stabilization, light metering, white balance, video quality, manual controls, shutter lag, frames per second, camera ready time, etc. Ultimately on all counts, regarding the Op's question of if his existing Canon point-and-shoot beats a smartphone, we must conclude that it does, because of all these other factors where camera phones still fall short. The cameras on phones like 1020 and 5S are good, but are severely limited in many ways, and therefore it should not be your only camera. You'll be glad in 5 or 10 years if you have a lot of great pix taken from a real camera to look back on — and not just a bunch of phone pictures all shot from the same focal length.

So so-called 'Apple folks' are "the academic/creative/artist/programmer types" and 'non-Apple' folks aren't. Lol, I worked in IT for 30 years, all the way from programmer to project manager. But you're right, I'm not the creative type. I started out in college in chemical engineering but got hooked on IT pretty early on. (Ah, the old punch card days, sure glad things have progressed!). So stereotyping people isn't such a good idea. Most especially people you've never met.

I'm pretty OS agnostic. But I don't like iOS on phones, never have. I bought the 920 because I liked the feel of the phone and everyone in my family were using WP phones. The Family group makes it worth it if for no other reason. And much to my surprise I found I really love WP8. Its too closed for my tastes too but I've found that since my retirement my needs in a phone OS have changed.

And for apps, I might have agreed with you a couple of years ago. But there has been a lot added recently. I have found an app for anything I need, including my banking app (which is very important to me). The apps Nokia has put out for free for pics (lots of filters) and their Maps are great. The days of 'WP phones have no apps' are gone. Take a look at the App Store, raw numbers mean nothing. As Apple folks love to say, 'quality above quantity'. That old meme is still being thrown around too much, rather like 'all Android phones are buggy, lag, etc'. That's not the case today. Way too many Apple folks sometimes simply keep repeating that stuff without even having used any other OS.

As for the camera, well I don't take cameras too seriously. If I get good pics as a point and shoot I'm pretty happy. I can now leave my camera at home. again, less stuff to lug around. But I've found the 920 pics to be better all around than my sister's iPhone pics. We have had about a year to compare while traveling. There really is no comparison. She's pretty envious so these days I just share mine with her. She loves her iPhone for a lot of other reasons. She is soooo non-techy it hurts. I'm very glad Apple came out with the iPhone, I don't have to be her tech support for it, (she didn't even know she could connect it to her home wifi!). And never discount 'ease of use'. My pics are fine for what I want, to capture moments in my life, period. I suppose you'll say that makes me 'not creative', I leave the serious photography to my husband since he loves it.

I have iPads because I love the form factor because I travel a lot and when you're flying 8000+ miles even a small netbook gets pretty heavy lugging around airports. I buy another every year. Although I don't like iOS 7 and I'm thinking that I will hold off this year and see if a jailbreak comes out before I but the next one. I updated when it came out and luckily found I could downgrade back to iOS 6. Way too much white for my old eyes. But that's another story.

As for being a paid troll, please note my join date. As I said before, don't assume just because someone isn't a pure Apple-lover that they are a paid troll. I've found that simply using what works best for the task at hand works for me (and plenty of others). And I have years and years of experience to come to that point.

But you're right, its a luxury to be able to spend time even discussing the pros and cons of a phone rather than just trying to survive. I still love talking tech even if I am retired. As my husband says, if it is electronic and has 'buttons' I just have to have it. Of course that was back when all electronics had buttons rather than touch screens! But the fetish continues...

Sorry if this reply seems a bit random. I'm getting ready to leave. I'm taking my grandkids to San Francisco today. Their first plane trip. And yes, I'll be taking a lot of pics with my 920 and I'm sure they will turn out just fine.

I hope everything turns out well for the OP whatever choice he/she makes. In all truth either phone will probably do just fine.

Have a great day!
 
Actually, I do know. I've read several detailed reviews of it. Everything I have said is correct.

Nice. I've spent ten years in the same office with the guys who made it. What you said was totally off the mark on pretty much all accounts.

The claim that Nokia has better European maps is irrelevant since you can download the Nokia maps app for iOS already.

No, you can't. You can download a HTML5 "app" that is essentially the same as the here.com web service. It is nothing that would be even closely compareable to the WP software suite (Maps, Drive, Transit, City Lens).

What exactly are "MS services"?

Bing, SkyDrive, Sharepoint, Office 365, Outlook.com, Exchange...

I'd prefer it if MS made Office apps for iOS just like they do for Mac.

They do. Unfortunately it's for iPhone only and requires a subscription to Office 365.
 
Your first post in this thread was exactly that though and just slammed Microsoft and Windows Phone.

I slammed their mobile OS and called some things they do "copies" — and I stand by that. Have you been to a Microsoft retail store? I am not slamming their whole company at all. I criticize a lot of things Apple does as well.


You really did NOT need to be that rude towards the OP.

Sorry if it seemed rude, but I tend to feel some products are wasted on certain people. For example I was looking at guitars and I picked up a $3000 Paul Reed Smith. I knew that I was not worthy of that guitar. I'm not sure I could even recognize what features make it superior. If someone can't recognize why an iPhone 5S is superior, isn't it the same principle? Of course I think most people can tell the difference after using it for awhile and owning one. It's not meant to be rude. Some people's usage of the device won't take advantage of what makes iOS better, like if they were purely just using it as a phone, for example.

Wasn't there the Palm OS and Windows Mobile before iOS?

And before that, there was the Apple Newton.

OP, go for the 5s. It's the better phone of the two and will best fit your needs .

nods
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.