Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

TimmyCrook

macrumors member
Original poster
Jan 9, 2019
70
56
Do you think Apple will look to integrate the M1 type chip so it will fit onto the current board and switch from INTEL? Forgive my ignorance if the answer is obvious. I have read a few opinions, but was more confused than anything. Thanks
 
Last edited:
Not in it's current form. The M1 is an incredible chip but it's not worthy of being in a Mac Pro. Now, we will have to wait to see what they do with something like a M1x or M2 chip. I'm sure they will be able to surpass our imaginations with performance.

What I'm more interested in, is PCIe support. A Mac Pro without expandability? That's concerning.
 
The rumor is Apple is developing a smaller Mac Pro with a higher end Apple chip. It's unclear if Apple will continue to sell a larger model like the 7,1. The performance of the M1 is incredible, especially considering it's the lowest end chip. It's faster than all 7,1 Intel chips in single core and almost as fast at the 8 core in multi core. A high end Apple chip for the new Mac Pro should be mind-boggling.
 
Not in it's current form. The M1 is an incredible chip but it's not worthy of being in a Mac Pro. Now, we will have to wait to see what they do with something like a M1x or M2 chip. I'm sure they will be able to surpass our imaginations with performance.

What I'm more interested in, is PCIe support. A Mac Pro without expandability? That's concerning.
I should’ve been more specific, the question I was asking is will there be arm chipsets made by Apple that will fit into the socket where the current Intel chip sits
 
I should’ve been more specific, the question I was asking is will there be arm chipsets made by Apple that will fit into the socket where the current Intel chip sits

That's a great question - I doubt that they will. But no one but Apple knows that yet.
 
It's an interesting clash of designs. The 7,1 is a "big iron" approach that can host a lot of resources. The new ARM based SOC designs are all about doing as much as possible on a tiny die.
What will be the relationship between the ASi GPU cores and discrete GPU cores in PCIe slots? Will there need to be a PCIe4/5 bridge chip(let)? If some compute tasks are round tripped to PCIe cards, will the SOC have to wait?
FWIW, I expect the 8,1 MP to feature a completely redesigned MoBo and be smaller - but that is certainly conjecture, to say the least.
 
Not in it's current form. The M1 is an incredible chip but it's not worthy of being in a Mac Pro. Now, we will have to wait to see what they do with something like a M1x or M2 chip. I'm sure they will be able to surpass our imaginations with performance.

What I'm more interested in, is PCIe support. A Mac Pro without expandability? That's concerning.
They may even go for 2 - 4 Arm chips in a Mac Pro if they are struggling to get core numbers in 12-18 months. The current design of the Arm chip may not allow for say 16 or 24 cores.
 
I think the 7, 1 is a completely walled off garden and its going to stay that way with no cross-pollination with the 8,1 in terms of interchangeability ~
Its even possible the 7,1 MPX modules won't fit in the coming half-size Mac Pro.
 
The MP8,1 is likely to happen before the end of 2022.
It will use the best of what Apple makes in the M-line.

The bigger question is going to be how Apple is going to go from a SOC to an expandable (and hence much more discreet) system.
Right now the M1 is the very low end of what they'll sell, it outperforms just about anything in its class at a much lower thermal allowance.
The thermal budget in the current MP7,1 would allow for insane amounts of performance in its enclosure. And that offers a huge promise and hope.

Yet there are issues Apple's engineering will have to solve before you can go from that SOC based system to a modular MP8,1 most in these forums would like to see happen.

About the expandability:
- PCIe (whatever version) ... big unknown if and how they'll handle it and we're unlikely to learn how they plan on dealing with it till they release the next MP - remember there's even in the current intel based mac lineup not a single other mac but the MP7,1 that has any PCIe slot.
- RAM: the M1 has its RAM in the same package as the CPU, GPU, neural engine, etc. (essentially: *everything* is in the same chip) and is hence completely impossible to upgrade for any user. The very high possible RAM amounts the MP7,1 supports in its highest configurations are rather difficult to attain in a SOC setting (all 12 RAM modules, all their storage into one SOC ... not likely to become a product).
Yet: that single chip and unified RAM are rather at the core of the Apple Silicon design. So changing that and/or allowing for those needing really huge amounts of RAM is hard to predict how they'll chose to solve it.
- GPUs: The M1 machines rely on the GPU and the rest of the CPU/ ML engine etc. to have access to the same RAM. So much so that the external enclosures connected via TB3 with a PCIe based GPU in it are no longer supported in Big Sur on the M1 based machines. Yet separate GPUs with their own RAM in the MPX modules are a base characteristic of the MP7,1. So Apple is at least going to have to look at how modular/expandable they can make the GPU without having that unified RAM setup they have now.

This all might lead to Apple choosing a totally different solution from what the MP1,1->5,1 and the 7,1 have: that backplane that's a bit "PC"-like with a CPU, RAM on the motherboard and PCI slots that hold graphic cards and other stuff.
They might go further on what they did with the MPX modules and make it their own type of bus, they might still go for a parallel number of SOC modules and let those sit on a (number of) daughter cards so you could still upgrade CPU/GPU/RAM etc. but only by getting another board from Apple.

Predicting where their engineering teams are looking at or even have had success in implementing yet, let alone what will make it to a product is very hard this far out. All we have seen so far are the most basic machines, not anything near the most complex machine that would be the next MP.

The good news: Apple has had a serious amount of time to let their engineering teams figure out what paths are an option for both their lowest and their highest end machines. I'm convinced they already have a (number of) solutions up their sleeve before Tim got on stage earlier this year to announce Apple Silicon as a strategic choice for the entire mac product line..
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.