Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.


These have either inbuilt batteries or use Type-C PD for powerbanks to power, but there are also portable monitors which use Sony NP-F batteries (usually used for cameras, displays, lights, etc).
 
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.


These have either inbuilt batteries or use Type-C PD for powerbanks to power, but there are also portable monitors which use Sony NP-F batteries (usually used for cameras, displays, lights, etc).
My issue is the quality level of the Dell portable monitor - I don't need battery power, the Dell uses USB-C right from the MBP. That part is good, but FHD vs. the Mac Display isn't. My preference is to stay with a portable USB-C monitor - with a higher resolution. I see a few out there - wondered if anyone has used and has feedback.. Thanks!
 
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
My issue is the quality level of the Dell portable monitor - I don't need battery power, the Dell uses USB-C right from the MBP. That part is good, but FHD vs. the Mac Display isn't. My preference is to stay with a portable USB-C monitor - with a higher resolution. I see a few out there - wondered if anyone has used and has feedback.. Thanks!
I see. 2k might be a good resolution for such a small monitor.
 
Once the novelty of all the amazing things you can do with an iPad waned, I just found it wasn't as fast doing things as a laptop.

For lack of a better word, you can 'shrink' the experience on a Mac better. You can get used to keycommands, squish 3 or 4 windows of information on the screen. And the interactive targets can get really tiny using a mouse. Any of the more advanced apps on the iPad you are always juggling side panels and the buttons are either chunky or too small. buttons on a screen that is already pretty small. I know there are power users out there that can handle all the multitasking the iPad can do, but to me it's a lot more fiddly and annoying to use.
 
  • Like
Reactions: teralpar
Likewise. Ever since getting an iMac for WFH, I much prefer working on that than my iPad Pro with all the peripherals. I've been using Macs since 2003 and I just know this OS in and out. I'm thinking of selling the iPad Pro and putting the money into an M1 Air. The only thing I like the Pro for is drawing, but I just don't do enough of it. One of the many, many times I had high expectations and dreams, but in reality, I'm a fossil too stuck in his old computer paradigms of files and multitasking.
 
Last edited:
Sidecar is kinda a gimmick to me, never found it useful, I vote M1 Air. The Intel 2020 Airs were nice but the M1 is serious step up in CPU and SSD speed.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.