LOL. No one is dreaming about your life.I live a life you could only dream of
LOL. No one is dreaming about your life.I live a life you could only dream of
What are you even talking about. I am not sure if you are a fanboy or what not. But thats exactly what they did with this is unlocking feature.Is that so? Couldn't possibly be that there were engineering nuances that they hadn't worked out yet at the time of M3's launch that prevented them from supporting it at the time.
There is literally ZERO reason for them to withhold a feature like this and then add it later. Zero. If they want to withhold it to create artificial segmentation, then you don't add it later. They simply hadn't worked it out yet on the M3 a few months ago, and they made sure it was ready by the time the M3 Air launched.
This is Apple. Created an amazing SoC and they cannot figure out how to enable two external screen features?It is NOT proof. It is possible that it didn't work smooth enough with software upon release to offer that. Proof would evidence of a deliberate internal plan to hose users. Proof is not because the are offering it now when they didn't until now.
Shoot. My old 2010 13inch lived in clamshell more than half the time. Ideally, these laptops could be left open, screen off, if wanted. Windows lets you do this. But you're saying that isn't the case, huh?Close the lid. Apple has an image of it like this in their marketing material for the M3 Air.
And this is EXACTLY it. As they tell us all the time, only Apple as they make the software and hardware.This is Apple. Created an amazing SoC and they cannot figure out how to enable two external screen features?
It still exists on the Intel models. They didn't remove it.
It never existed on M series chips. They didn't remove it.
Life is all about compromises.This is Apple. Created an amazing SoC and they cannot figure out how to enable two external screen features?
It could be that the reason for hardware at all is to deal with nonsense like video copy protection.
Or they worked on their algorithms to deal with the fact the the PCIe lanes simply aren’t there and did some firmware changes to allow an additional external display *when the internal one is disabled*.so they just discovered a "magical" and "courageous" way of enabling this? What a clown show ...
Apple is explicit:Shoot. My old 2010 13inch lived in clamshell more than half the time. Ideally, these laptops could be left open, screen off, if wanted. Windows lets you do this. But you're saying that isn't the case, huh?
Exactly. Not the first time. Stagemanager was another stunt and enabling bluetooth 5.3 on another Mac.so they just discovered a "magical" and "courageous" way of enabling this? What a clown show ...
Interesting, I can't get my M1 Pro MBP to work on two monitors with a single USB-C solution. Connected to a dock that does 96W passthrough. DisplayLink doesn't always work for me either even though the dock says it supports DisplayLink.my M1 Max can handle 2 displays as long as the mac is powered
This is for the base M3. Which never supported this. M3 Pro does because it’s more advanced SoC with more capabilities.I hope you're joking as support for two external displays was already available for the M3 Pro MacBook Pros.
This is probably why they took the time to address it in software. Probably was buggy. If you are in clamshell and have two monitors, what happens when you open the laptop? Was probably quite buggy for a while.This is good news. I wonder how this is done.
My understanding was that the non-Pro M SoCs had two display controllers, and two wires: on the Mac mini, both go straight to ports on the back, whereas on the MacBooks and iMac, one goes to the internal display, and the other to the ports.
Presumably, the M3 still only has two display controllers. But, perhaps they added a third wiring: one port is always connected, and either the internal display or the other port is connected. But for the fall MBP with M3 release, they hadn't finished the firmware in time to actually dynamically switch between the two whenever the lid closes or is opened.
Firmware. They’d be stupid to even try.I wonder how many lawyers are already thinking class action lawsuits for a software limitation.
Called it! https://forums.macrumors.com/thread...-display.2409623/?post=32689909#post-32689909
The same holds true of M1/M2. It's still absolutely an artificial limitation on those platforms.
So ******, there no reason the M1 and M2 series chips shouldn't be able to do this either. In 2024 when laptops with docking stations is becoming the defacto setup for so many professionals (who truly only need an air in 99% of the cases) it was a super ****** thing to do.
So it’s possible in the M2 air??Called it! https://forums.macrumors.com/thread...-display.2409623/?post=32689909#post-32689909
The same holds true of M1/M2. It's still absolutely an artificial limitation on those platforms.
"Engineering nuances" not worked out? You're surely kidding...Apple MADE the M3 and M3 Pro and they're not that different. You think their chip engineers have been sitting around scratching their heads wondering how to do something as simple as this when it works on the almost same M3 Pro chip? If the M3 was designed to support 2 monitors from the beginning, then they know what they're doing.Is that so? Couldn't possibly be that there were engineering nuances that they hadn't worked out yet at the time of M3's launch that prevented them from supporting it at the time.
There is literally ZERO reason for them to withhold a feature like this and then add it later. Zero. If they want to withhold it to create artificial segmentation, then you don't add it later. They simply hadn't worked it out yet on the M3 a few months ago, and they made sure it was ready by the time the M3 Air launched.
Proofs that Apple is restricting features intentionally. Stagemanager 3.0.
What!?
Really?
I kept getting told this "wasn't possible" for x/y/z technical reason
Regardless, great to see!
We won’t know until someone does a hardware comparison between the chips.So it’s possible in the M2 air??
He didn't say it was mis-sold or falsely advertised, just that this feature should've been included from the start.
What was the point of locking out this feature if it was always going to be enabled in an update eventually?
Was there some kind of software hurdle they recently overcame? Or did they decide enabling this would increase sales of the M3 Air, and they would then have to enable it on the Pro as well to justify the difference in price?